Categorical Propositions Exam 3 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

Relate Subject terms to predicate terms
(Connecting who or what the sentence is about to what they are doing)

A

Categorical Proposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

represents a person, thing, or concept (What or who the sentence is about)

A

Subject Term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is said about the subject of the sentence

A

Predicate term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

All S are P
No S are P
Some S are P
Some S are not P

A

Four types of categorical propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Word like “All” or “Some” are…

A

quantifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Links the subject and predicate terms

A

copula

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Always has a subject term that is a noun or noun phrase, a predicate term that is a noun or phrase, with a quantifier (All, no, or some), and a copula linking the subject and predicate terms (Are or are not)

A

standard form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Affirmative quality (“All” or “Some”) or Negative quality (“No” or “Some”) affirms or denies class membership of a categorical proposition

A

quality (categorical propositions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Universal quality (“All” or “No”) or Particular quality (“Some”) of a categorical proposition

A

quantity (categorical proposition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The statement applies to every member of the group it talks about (Applies to terms, not to propositions)

A

Distribution (categorical proposition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A : Universal affirmative (S distributed)
E : Universal negative (S and P distributed)
I : Particular affirmative (S and P undistributed)
O: Particular negative(P distributed)

A

Letter names of the four categorical propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statements or claims that can be either true or false

A

Propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two perspectives : Aristotelean and Boolean.

A

Existential import

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Using universal statements “All” or “No” implies that the subject of the statement exists

A

Aristotelian standpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

developed by John Venn to represent the information expressed by categorical propositions

A

Venn Diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Something is true because there is nothing there that makes it is false.

A

Vacuously True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Something is wrong because there is nothing to make it true

A

Vacuously False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

drawing a conclusion from one proposition without a lot of steps or complex reasoning. (“All cats have tails” conclusion “Some cats have tails”)

A

Immediate Inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Saying something about an entire group as if it is real but no one knows if it is real or not.

A

Existential fallcy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places

A

Conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When the quality (Affirmative or negative) is changed and the predicate term is replace with its complement it is…

A

Observsion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places and replace each with its term compliment. (All horses are animals; all non-animals are non-horses)

A

Contraposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places (No cats are dogs; No dogs are cats)

A

Converse statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

when the converse of an A,E,I, or O statement is mistakenly assumed to be true when it has invalid logic.

A

Fallacy of illicit conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
everything that doesn't belong to a specific set within a larger set of things. It includes all the elements that are not in that set.
Class complement
26
the exact opposite of the term (All cats are mammals; All cats are non-mammals)
Term complement
27
If a then b -> If not b then not A
The contrapositive of a given statement
28
When someone incorrectly switches the subject and the predicate of a statement in a contraposition leading to an invalid argument.
Fallacy of Illicit contraposition
29
Illustrates the relationship of mutually contradictory pairs of categorical propositions. If one is true the other is automatically false. (If all Cats are Black, Then none of the Cats are not Black)
Modern square of opposition
30
opposite truth value (A-0 and E-I)
contradictory relation
31
At least one of the propositions is false (A-E) one of them is false
contrary relation
32
At least one of the propositions is true (I-O) one of them must be true
subcontrary relation
33
The truth trickles down from A-I and E-O The falsity trickles up from I-A and O-E
subalternation relation
34
illicit contrary
35
illicit subcontrary
36
illicit subalternation
37
conditionally valid
38
Statements that incorporate forms of the verb "to be" other than "are" and "are not: or omit it entirely need to have the implicit "are" or "are not" made explicit. Ex: Some dogs would rather bark than bite Some dogs ARE ANIMALS THAT would rather bark than bite
Nonstandard verbs
39
Propositions that make assertions about singular nouns can be transformed into universals by means of a "parameter"
singular propositions
40
A phrase that affects the number of the subject term without changing its meaning. Ex: Socrates is mortal ALL PEOPLE IDENTICAL TO Socrates are PEOPLE WHO ARE mortal
parameter
41
Implicit quantifies must be made explicit. to determine the quantity you must be sensitive to the most probable meaning of the statement.
unexpressed quantifiers
42
nonstandard quantifiers
43
conditional statements
44
Propositions using the words "Only" "None but" "None except etc.
exclusive propositions
45
exceptive propositions
46
What does A distribute?
The Subject
47
What does E distribute?
The Subject and the Predicate
48
What does I distribute?
Neither the subject nor the predicate
49
What does O distribute?
The Predicate
50
What does Universal quantity distribute?
Subjects
51
What do Negative quantity distribute?
Predicates
52
Arguments that are from the boolean standpoint are valid regardless of whether they refer to existing things.
Unconditionally Valid
53
When you change the quality (affirmative or negative) and replace the predicate with its term compliment (All horses are animals; no horses are non-animals)
Obversion
54
A false A proposition is equal to an...
O proposition
55
A false O proposition is equal to an...
A proposition
56
A false E proposition is equal to an...
I proposition
57
A false I proposition is equal to an...
E proposition
58
adverbs "Where" "Anywhere" "nowhere") may be translated using the word "places" Ex" Wherever you hide, they will find you and they will tax you"
Spatial adverbs
59
adverbs "When" "Whenever" "Always" may be translated using "times" Ex: He is never clean shaven
Temporal adverbs
60
Pronouns ("Who" "Whoever" "Anyone") may be translated using "people"
Personal Pronouns
61
Pronouns ("What" "Whatever" "Anything") may be translated using "Things"
Impersonal Pronouns