Causation Flashcards
(7 cards)
Factual causation
On the balance of probabilities, but for the D’s negligence would the C have suffered the harm?
Legal causation
Is the harm suffered too remote?
Multiple causes of harm and the outcome on factual causation
- competing causes of harm - the breach that substantially causes the harm will be sufficient to prove causation.
- materially contributed to harm - the breach that materially contributed to the harm will be sufficient to prove causation;
- materially increased the risk of harm
What happens if the negligent act increases the risk of something happening (lost chance claims)
If the “lost chance” is below 50% then on the balance of probabilities the court is unlikely to find for the C.
What is the test for remoteness?
Was the type/kind of damage reasonably foreseeable at the time the breach of duty occurred? It is the type or kind of damage that needs to be foreseeable, not the extent.
Eggshell skull theory
Take your victim as you find them.
Intervening acts
- the C’s act;
- a third party act;
- separate/natural act
The act must be unreasonable.