Causation Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

Factual causation

A

On the balance of probabilities, but for the D’s negligence would the C have suffered the harm?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legal causation

A

Is the harm suffered too remote?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Multiple causes of harm and the outcome on factual causation

A
  • competing causes of harm - the breach that substantially causes the harm will be sufficient to prove causation.
  • materially contributed to harm - the breach that materially contributed to the harm will be sufficient to prove causation;
  • materially increased the risk of harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens if the negligent act increases the risk of something happening (lost chance claims)

A

If the “lost chance” is below 50% then on the balance of probabilities the court is unlikely to find for the C.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the test for remoteness?

A

Was the type/kind of damage reasonably foreseeable at the time the breach of duty occurred? It is the type or kind of damage that needs to be foreseeable, not the extent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Eggshell skull theory

A

Take your victim as you find them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intervening acts

A
  • the C’s act;
  • a third party act;
  • separate/natural act

The act must be unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly