Causation Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

Common Law Causation Test

A

Was the D’s conduct a but-for cause of the result

Was there an intervening cause after the D’s act?
If no, there is direct causation

If yes, was the intervening cause foreseeable and reasonably related to the defendant’s conduct

If yes, then intervening cause is dependent and there is causation

If no, then intervening cause is independent and there is no causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common Law Causation and Medical Care

A

medical care is a normal and foreseeable response to a wound/injury and was only a superseding cause it was OUTRAGEOUSLY IMPROPER OR INAPPROPRIATE AS TO BE REGARDED AS ABNORMAL

Merely negligent medical care does not reach that standard

Grossly negligent or intentionally harmful medical care does break the causal chain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Common Law Year and a Day

A

Defendant can’t be charged with homicide unless the victim dies within a year and a day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MPC Causation Test for Purposefully and Knowingly

A

Ask if defendant was an antecedent but-for which the result would not have occurred

When purposely or knowingly causing a particular result is an element, the element is not established if the actual result is NOT WITHIN the PURPOSE OR CONTEMPLATION of the actor UNLESS:
a. a different person or property was harmed OR the defendant caused a lesser harm than contemplated OR
b. The result involves the same kind of injury or harm as designed or contemplated and is NOT too remote or accidental in its occurrence to have a just bearing on the actor’s liability OR on the gravity of the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MPC Causation Test for Recklessly and Negligently

A

Ask if defendant was an antecedent but-for which the result would not have occurred

When recklessly or negligently causing a particular result is an element of an offense, the element is not established if the result is NOT WITHIN the RISK OF WHICH THE ACTOR IS AWARE OR in the case of NEGLIGENCE, of which he SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE UNLESS:
a. a different person or property was harmed OR the defendant caused a lesser harm than contemplated OR
b. The result involves the same kind of injury or harm as designed or contemplated and is NOT too remote or accidental in its occurrence to have a just bearing on the actor’s liability OR on the gravity of the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MPC Causation and Medical Care

A

Ask if negligent medical care is too remote or accidental to break the causal chain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Concurrent Causation

A

When two independent acts at the same time that would each independently cause the result, both actors will be held fully criminally liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly