Causing loss by Deception and Propensity Flashcards
(19 cards)
Section 240(1)(d) Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception
Everyone is guilty of obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception who, by any deception and without claim of right
d) causes loss to any other person
Define ‘loss’
In most cases will involve financial detriment to the victim
What must the loss caused by the defendant be?
Must be ing the nature of a direct loss. Indirect losses, such as expectation loss (loss of a bargain) and loss of anticipated future profits are not included.
What was concluded in R v Morley?
“The loss alleged by the victim must have been induced by, or caused in reliance, upon the deception.
But the deception need not be the only operative factor, so long as it played a material part in occasioning the loss”.
Interpretation of ‘any other person’
Person, owner and other words of the like kind. Include the Crown and any public body or local authority, any board, society or company, and inhabitants.
What must the Prosecution prove for Causing loss by Deception?
- The loss was caused by a deception
- It was reasonably foreseeable some more than trivial loss would occur but
- Need to prove the loss was intentionally caused
(no requirement to prove anyone benefitted)
Penalties for obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception
a) if loss caused or value of what is obtained or sought to be obtained exceeds $1000. 7 years
b) exceeds $500 but does not exceed $1000. 1 year imprisonment
c) does not exceed $500. 3 months
What is propensity evidence?
Evidence that tends to show a persons propensity to act in a particular way or have a particular state of mind, being evidence of acts, omissions, events, or circumstances with which a person is alleged to have been involved
What does propensity evidence not include?
Does not include evidence of an act or omission that is -
i) 1 of the elements of the offence for which the person is being tried or
ii) the cause of action in the proceeding in question
When may propensity evidence be offered?
In a civil or criminal proceeding about any person
What specific sections can propensity evidence be offered in criminal and sexual cases?
Criminal - Sections 41, 42 or 43
Sexual - Section 44
Explain when the prosecution can offer propensity evidence about a defendant in a criminal proceeding?
When the evidence has a probative value in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding which outweighs the risk that the evidence may have an unfairly prejudicial effect on the defendant
What does the judge take into account when considering the probative value of propensity evidence? a & b
a) the frequency with which the acts, omissions, events, or circumstances which are the subject of the evidence have occurred.
b) the connection in time between the acts, omissions, events, or circumstances which are the subject of the evidence and the acts which constitute the offence
What does the judge take into account when considering the probative value of propensity evidence? c & d
c) the extent of the similarity between the acts, omissions, events or circumstances
d) the number of persons making allegations that are the same as the subject of the offence
What may the Judge consider when assessing the PREJUDICIAL effect of propensity evidence?
- whether the evidence is likely to unfairly predispose the fact-finder against the defendant
- whether the fact finder will tend to give disproportionate weight in reaching a verdict to evidence
In simple when is propensity evidence admissible in cases of deception?
When there is a sufficiently strong connection between the offences
What does ‘Adams on Criminal Law’ suggest regarding propensity evidence?
That the Court will decide on whether the evidence is propensity evidence. Persistent dishonesty across the board, embracing a number of offences, would not in itself bring the propensity rule into play. More likely to be used in cases involving specific offences with pattern
When is evidence relevant under Section 7(3)?
When it has a tendency to prove or disprove anything that is of consequence to the determination of the proceeding
What was concluded in R v Sharma?
“The ultimate issue is the degree to which the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect”.