CDI-3 Crime Investigation Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

-is an inquiry, judicial or otherwise, for the discovery and collection of facts
concerning the matter or matters involved.
- It is the process of inquiring, eliciting, soliciting and getting vital information/facts/
circumstances in order to establish the truth (PNP, 2011).

A

Investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • is an ensemble of methods by which crimes are studied and criminals apprehended. The
    criminal investigator seeks to ascertain the methods, motives, and identities of criminals and
    the identity of victims and may also search for and interrogate witnesses.
A

Crime investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

It is the lawful, objective, logical search for people for people and things useful in reconstructing the circumstances surrounding the commission of a crime.

A

Crime investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • a special study of modern techniques in the investigation of serious and specific crimes including murder, homicide, rape, abortion, robbery, arson, kidnapping. Blackmail carnapping and criminal negligence.
A

Special crime investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General Principles of Investigation

A

Criminal Investigation is the collection of facts to accomplish a three-fold aim (PNP, 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Three-fold aim

A
  1. To identify the suspect
  2. To locate the suspect
  3. To provide evidence of his guilt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to the PNP Revised Criminal Investigation Manual (2011), the investigator must seek to
establish the six (6) cardinal points of investigation, namely

A
  1. What specific offense has been committed
  2. How the offense was committed
  3. Who committed it
  4. Where the offense was committed; and
  5. Why it was committed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

is the simple questioning of a person who cooperates with the investigator. In the account of the interview, the witnesses voluntarily give their account about the commission of a crime.

A

Interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is a form or technique in the conduct of interview upon willing and cooperative witnesses, where they are given the full opportunity to narrate their accounts without interventions,
interruption and interference from the interviewer. After the subject has finished his narration, the investigator now subjects him to the style of direct examination and cross-examination, to clarify the unexplained portions to arrive at a vivid and complete picture of the testimony.

A

Cognitive interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

are also practiced by some investigators whereby after
each question by the investigator, the interviewee is required to answer on what he knows about what
is being asked.

A

Questions and Answer style of interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Never conduct or let anyone conduct an interview if the interviewer has not gone to the crime scene.”

A

THE GOLDEN RULE IN INTERVIEW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

is the relation between the interviewer and the interviewee, which is conducive to a fruitful result

A

Rapport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The appearance of the interviewer and other qualities such as skills of communication techniques or the force of his language are the mainstays of the strength
of his character

A

Forceful personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

His tone of voice must be conversational, not confrontational as in interrogation

A

Conversational tone of voice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

He must possess the qualities of an actor, salesman and psychologist and
know how to use the power of persuasion

A

Acting qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

He must be courteous, sympathetic and humble, ready to ask apologies for the inconvenience of the interview

A

Humility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Witnesses who lack the courage to face the suspect, his associates or
relatives always entertain the fear of reprisal

A

Fear of reprisal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

On the part of those of hand-to-mouth existence there is this real
inconvenience, which will deprive them the time to earn for their living especially during the
ordeal of testifying during the trial

A

Great inconvenience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

This hatred maybe due to previous bad experience with
rogue members of the police organization

A

Hatred against the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The witness maybe an acquaintance, friend, helper, or benefactor of
the suspect

A

Bias of the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

There are witnesses who are shy and they shun publicity that will being discomfort top their ordinary or obscure way of living

A

Avoidance of publicity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Some famous and respected families preserve their reputations by instilling to their members the need of the approval of their elders on matters affecting their families

A

Family restrictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q
  1. The interviewer should identify himself and the and the agency to which he belongs
    2.He should try to size up the interviewee and reach to tentative conclusion about his type, then
    use the best interview approach
  2. He should keep in mind the provisions of law regarding the rights of people under custodial
    investigation
A

Opening the Interview 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The investigator should review the facts at the crime scene and information from other sources in order that he would be ready for the questioning. A background data of
the subject should be available so that he could adapt himself to the kind of approach to be
employed.

A

Preparation/planning 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
In planning the interview, the interviewer should consider
a. The facts of the case which have been established so far b. The information needed to complete the picture c. The sources of information that may be consulted such as files and record d. The possibility of confronting the suspect with physical evidence e. The time available for the interview f. The time allowed by law
26
the investigator must carefully select his kind of approach, which maybe a singlekind, combination of two or the application of all techniques
Approach
27
This is done by preliminary or exploratory questions to clear the atmosphere, promote a conducive ground for cordiality, respect and trust for each other.
Warming up
28
The subject now is asked to narrate his account without interruption, intervention or interference. It is only after the completion of the uninterrupted narration that the investigator begins his direct and cross examinations
Cognitive interview
29
Multiple, complex and legalistic questions should be avoided. One question at a time is desired
One question at a time
30
A short simple question at a time is required. If the answer needs qualification, then, it should be allowed. Avoid legalistic questions such as; who is murderer; or who are in conspiracy with the subject
Simplicity of the question
31
Embarrassing questions on the subject on matters of exaggeration or honest errors about time, distance and description can be avoided if the investigator will cooperate with the subject with the subject “to save his face”. the investigator should not fault or ridicule the subject on these matters
Saving faces
32
Do not ask questions which could be answered by yes or no only. will curtail the complete flow of information and will lead to inaccuracy
Yes, and no answer
33
The interviewer should always leave the door open for a re-interview. Don’t forget to say “THANK YOU” after the interview (true or false)
True
34
these are the reluctant type of witness
Know, nothing type
35
This is the uncooperative and indifferent subject
Disinterested type
36
The style of questioning by the investigator should be adapted to the psychology of the subject. When the drunken subject has sobered, another interview will be conducted, confronting him about his disclosures while in the state of drunkenness. The written statement must be taken during his sobriety.
The drunken type
37
These are witnesses who are prone to exaggerate, adding irrelevant or new matters to their narration.
Talkative type
38
These are the truthful and cooperative witnesses where the investigator could rely upon, with little or no problem in handling them
Honest witnesses
39
These are the liar type of witnesses
Deceitful witnesses 
40
They are the shy witnesses. The approach must be friendly and reassuring confidentiality of their information. They should be hidden from the devouring press by interviews or photo sessions
Timid witnesses
41
These are the most difficult subjects to deal with. Find out the reasons of their personality. The cause maybe trauma, shock, fear, hatred and others. Remove these fetters of silence and they will start talking.
Refusal to talk witness
42
the vigorous and confrontational questioning of a reluctant suspect about his participation in a crime; is the process of obtaining an admission or confession from those suspects which means that the suspect is confronted about his participation in the commission in an offense. is the act or process of questioning somebody closely, often in an aggressive manner, especially as part of an official investigation or trial.
Interrogation
43
To find out the truth about the crime ▪ To obtain an admission or confession of guilt from the suspect ▪ To gain all facts in order to determine the method of operation or modus operandi and the circumstances of the crime in question ▪ To collect information that guides investigators to arrive at a logical conclusions
Goals of interrogation
44
this refers to the interrogator keep himself aware on the situation and he must observe and analyze the Interrogee without his knowledge
Planning and preparation
45
in this step, the interrogator should keep in mind to gain rapport with the subject.
Approach
46
This is considered the heart of interrogation. Were all techniques could apply to obtain information from the subject
Questioning
47
this refers to the ending of the interrogation process, and it should end in a friendly manner.
Termination
48
This refers to place in document the result of the interrogation, in this process it is advisable to tape record all conversation
Recording
49
This is the end product of the interrogation
Reporting
50
This is a technique where the investigator, combining his skills of an actor and a psychologist, addresses the suspect with an emotional appeal to confess. Devotees of a religion may belong to this type
Emotional appeal
51
The investigator, in his preliminary or probing questions must dig deep into the past troubles, plight and unfortunate events in the life of the suspect. An offer of help, kindness, friendliness, may win his cooperation
Sympathetic approach
52
A friendly approach coupled with a posture of sincerity may induce the suspect to confess
Friendliness
53
1) The Pretense of Solid Evidence against the accused (2) The weakest link (3) Drama (4) Feigning Contact with family Members (5) The line Up Method (Accused is lined-up among suspects) (6) Reverse Line-up Are example of what approach?
Tricks and bluff techniques
54
Accused is alone and coached witnesses and victims are piled to make accusations against the accused)
Reverse lineup
55
The investigator displays a stern (demands immediate response ) personality towards the suspect
Stern approach
56
In the questioning process, the investigator selects the right moment to shout a pertinent question in an apparent righteous outrage. The suspect’s nerves will break to a confession
Jolting
57
The suspect is given all the opportunities to lie. The suspect is questioned about his personal life, family, friends and his knowledge about the complainant and witnesses. Then the suspect is questioned about his activity prior, during and after the commission of the crime
Opportunity to lie
58
The first set of investigators must appear to be rough, mean and dangerous. When they had finished the interrogation, the second investigator intervenes by stopping the first set of investigators. By being sympathetic and understanding, he begins his interrogation. If the suspect still refuses to cooperate, then the process is repeated until there is a confession
The mutt and Jeff or the sweet and sour method
59
It is the use of reasons, which is acceptable to the subject that led to the commission of the crime. Thus, it may be said that sometimes, killing is a necessity rather than by purpose or design. Robbery may be a necessity to feed a starving family.
Rationalization
60
It is the process of putting the blame to other persons, not alone to the suspect. The murderer may blame the mastermind for corrupting him with big sums of money, or the mastermind blaming the greediness of the victim or the husband blaming the wife for her infidelity.
Projection
61
is the act of minimizing the culpability of the suspect. The investigator convinces the suspect that a confession will reduce the offense and the penalty. Thus, the investigator could study it if there is a way to downgrade murder to homicide or the introduction of mitigating circumstances with the result of the penalty being within the range of probation
Minimization
62
COMMON PHYSICAL SIGNS OF DECEPTION
1. Sweating 2. Color change 3. Dry mouth 4. Breathing 5. Pulse 6. Avoidance of direct contact
63
the nod of the head or any other body language as a response to the questions should be avoided. The answers must be oral, clear, explicit and responsive to the questions
Avoid implied answer