CH 13 (WM) Flashcards
-Apply the techniques used in pricing health and care insurance products in terms of data availability (41 cards)
State the general data considerations. [1.75]
Data should be:
- credible ✓
- relevant ✓
- readily available ✓
- reliable for the purpose intended.✓
The cost of obtaining/analysing the data and the format of the data should also be considered.✓✓✓
(CRrR)
What does “relevance” mean in the context of data considerations? [0.75]
Relevance implies a similar class of lives✓ and policy conditions✓ to those expected for the product in question.✓
Additional marks: Own data is the most relevant source of data.
What does “credibility” mean in the context of data considerations? [0.75]
Credibility implies a sufficiently large volume of data✓ to enable precise estimates to be calculated✓ (i.e. with relatively little sampling error).✓
Describe why a health insurer would carry out data adjustments for credibility and relevance purposes? [1]
- The insurer will adjust data to meet the requirement of exercise being performed.✓✓
- More accurate allowances can be made where insurer’s own experience is greater.✓✓
Describe how to make adjustments for projection to midpoint of insurance usage. [4.5]
- The initial estimates for assumptions are derived from past/historical data.✓✓
- The actuary will need to gather all information available from the local market on trends and developments ✓✓…
- in order to project this experience forward for the product’s lifetime✓.
- The actuary must incorporate not just the policy term, but also the length of time for which the current terms are to be offered.✓✓
- The assumptions will stay valid for an average of:
[Expected shelf-life of proposed prem rates] +
[Expected duration of policy to termination or to next review date].✓✓✓✓ - The adjustment method will be different for different assumptions.✓✓ Here we consider claim incidence rates, claim termination rates and average claim size.✓✓
- For example claim incidence rates vary by age and by calendar year✓✓, and
- claim termination rates vary by duration from commencement of claim.✓✓
List the key assumptions to be analysed and how it will be projected for each of the main products. [2.75]
- LTCI✓ - claim inception rates✓
- CI✓- claim incidence rates by each claim cause then combined.✓✓
- PMI✓ - claim incidence rates and average claim costs for each benefit or treatment category separately.✓✓✓
Rates should then be projected to midpoint of insurance usage.✓✓
(The question mentions “assumptions being projected” hence say something about projection of assumptions.)
Claim incidence rates will vary by which factors? [0.5]
Incidence rates will vary by age and by calendar year. ✓✓
Describe the adjustments required when projecting claim termination rates. [1.5]
Claim termination rates will vary by duration from commencement of claim.✓✓
Experience improvement or deterioration over time✓✓ may be assumed in producing expected claim rates, and claim termination rates.✓✓
Describe the adjustments required when projecting the average claim size. [3]
For PMI the average claim size will be a function of:✓
* inflation✓
* current protocols✓
* hospital charging structure✓,
* as well as the availability of treatments and care under any state healthcare system;✓✓ but we need only look at a year at a time, because premium rates are typically reviewed annually, and policies are renewed once a year.✓✓
It is important that where there is considerable uncertainty as to future experience, the contract allows for some form of future review.✓✓
Otherwise the cost of the reserves could make the premium to be charged too high to sell, in terms of perceived value for money.✓✓
Tip: The “avg pol size” assumption is specific to PMI policies.
State the “relevance factors” that should be considered when using external data for assumption setting? [3]
- Approach to UW and acceptance.✓✓
- Policy conditions✓, eg different diseases allowed as a CI claim by different companies.✓✓
- Claims management✓, eg different degree of effort made to rehabilitate LTCI claimants to get them back to care for themselves.✓✓
-Distribution method and channels✓✓ leading to different types of lives insured.✓ - Target market✓
“example, different…” (x2),
eg different diseases allowed as a CI claim…&
eg different degree of effort…
Describe the data “credibility issues” faced by an insurer and suggest how these shortcomings might be overcome. [2]
- For most HC business, the volume of business for many insurers over the recent past is not sufficient to be deemed credible.✓✓
- This is esp. true when the projection requires detail down to the level of particular risk cells.✓✓
- The actuary must then look elsewhere✓
- and must make appropriate adjustments✓✓
to allow for the characteristics of external statistics, which may not be fully relevant as estimators of future claims outgo.✓✓
Describe the suitability of “own data” for setting assumptions. [3]
- Most relevant source of data ✓✓
- but may not be credible, especially if data is broken into many risk cells. ✓✓
- may therefore need to be supplemented with external data. ✓✓
- Actuary may need to make adjustments to external data to make it appropriate. ✓✓
- Cost, reliability and format should not cause problems. ✓✓
- For new insurer the actuary will rely on other sources of data and not on internal as the latter will not exist. ✓✓
Explain what is meant by population data. [1.75]
- Some national governments produce a periodic analysis of the healthcare experience for the population.✓✓
- The degree of sophistication can vary enormously.✓
- It is a very important source of information to the actuary in healthcare premium assessments✓✓; for some lines and some risk cells, it is the only base from which a first estimate of future costs can be established.✓✓
Describe the suitability of “population data” for setting assumptions. [3]
- This will not be fully relevant to the insured lives or insurance products, eg claim definition.✓✓✓
- It should be very credible.✓✓
Disadvantages of population data:
- Questionable accuracy and reliability✓✓, esp. in HC where definitions may be subjective and the scope for double counting is significant.✓✓
- Data may not always be available electronically or in the appropriate format.✓✓
- May be out-of-date.✓
Provide an example of double-counting in population data. [1]
- CI policies cover HA and CABG as separate causes of claim.✓✓
- PHs who suffer a heart attack as well as undergoing bypass surgery would only incur one insurance claim, but would be represented twice in the population records.✓✓
Describe the two conflicting aspects when considering the relevance of national experience to that of insured lives. [3.5]
- Insured lives should be healthier and less prone to claim, ✓✓ because they have been underwritten and the less healthy declined or loaded. ✓✓
- However, moral hazard may be higher for PHs,✓✓ e.g. increased utilisation, i.t.o. both frequency and cost of treatment, ✓✓ of medical services when people are insured.
- Anti-selection can also be an issue. ✓✓
If the policy is deemed non-essential, then people choosing to purchase insurance are arguably doing so because they expect to gain from the contract. ✓✓
Actuaries may choose to offer a small discount on population statistics but the validity of this will depend on the insurer’s approach to sales, marketing, UW and claims. [1]
Insured lives may be subjected to max age; also mostly employed lives.
acronym for last sentence - MUSC
Describe the suitability of “reinsurance data” for setting assumptions. [2.5]
- The reinsurer should make the data as relevant as possible, ✓✓ although further adjustments may be needed for company’s specific underwriting & claims management. ✓✓
- Reinsurance premiums will be based on premiums calculated by insurer hence determine treaty profits. ✓✓
- Credibility will vary, but more credible than own data. ✓✓
- Reinsurer will likely provide data in return for a share of business. ✓✓
Describe the suitability of “insured lives data” for setting assumptions. [2.5]
- It is generally of sufficient volume to be statistically credible.✓✓
- This should be more relevant than population data as it is based on local experience of insured lives.✓✓
- It has been compiled by experts so accuracy should not be an issue.✓✓
- Drawback is that it is a market average; doesn’t relate to any one insurer.✓✓
- May not be relevant to individual insurers and by time it is published, may be out of date.✓✓
For insured lives data explain an approach actuary can follow to make adjustments for the market average and company’s own experience. [1.5]
- The strictness of UW and claims management might be reflected in similar ratios used for life insurance standard tables. ✓✓
- But caution should be taken if this is a new launch into a new HC product; ✓✓
- strict UW for mortality may not translate directly into similar margins when UW for morbidity for CI business. ✓✓
Describe the suitability of data obtained from returns to the insurance supervisor for setting assumptions. [3.75]
- These are likely to be highly accurate. ✓
- The degree of detail that the actuary can extract for the estimation of future risk in individual cells is questionable though. ✓✓
- The returns are produced to assess solvency and certainly not to assist competitors with pricing. ✓✓
- Can provide a high-level check on premiums produced from other sources. ✓✓
- The data has national relevance to company concerned. ✓✓
- However care should be exercised since policy conditions might differ. ✓✓
- Approaches to UW & acceptance and claims management procedures are likely to be materially different from the market average. ✓✓
- This data should be more credible than insurer’s own data but less credible than population data. ✓✓
List all the sources of data [2.25]
- Own data
- Population Data
- Reinsurers data
- Insured lives data
- Returns to the insurance supervisor
- Overseas data
- Actuarial consultants
- Rate table software
- Trade magazines
An insurer has some overseas insured lives data for a particular product, but no home industry data.
Provide a formula that shows how rates for the home insured lives can be derived. [1]
{home insured industry morbidity rates}/{o/s insured industry morbidity rates} =
{home population morbidity rates}/{o/s population morbidity rates}
List the adjustments for relevance purposes that are required when using overseas data. [1]
Adjustments required for differences in:
- State HC provision
- Market practices
- Legislation
- Policy conditions
(Acronym: SMaL P)
Describe the suitability of “data from actuarial consultants” for setting assumptions. [2.5]
- The consultant/actuary should make the data as relevant as possible, ✓✓ although further adjustments may be needed for company’s specific underwriting & claims management. ✓✓
- Credibility will vary (perhaps check this with consultant?), but more credible than own data. ✓✓
- Consultants would normally charge a fee for their service. ✓✓
- However likely to have less of an interest in risk. ✓✓