Ch. 3 Research Methods Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

variable

A

a characteristic that varies from person to person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dependent variable

A

expected to change based on independent; an outcome affected by independent variable(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

independent variable

A

manipulated in study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

experimental design

A

control vs. treatment groups
ex. presence vs. absence of natural light in classrooms
- relatively confident in the inference made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

quasi-experimental design

A

researchers compare groups on predetermined characteristics
- cannot use random assignment
ex. age, gender, sex, social class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

single factor design

A

studies that catalog information about how people perform based on their age but do not attempt to rule out social or historical factor
- only one variable studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

age

A

number of years a person is on the Earth; chronologic measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cohort

A

year of birth
ex. technology- Cohort effect
- normative graded influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

time of measurement

A

year of testing
ex. Spring 2023
- presently affecting people
ex. the economy affecting financial security, Spring 2020
- historically graded affects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

longitudinal design

A

follows one group of people over time; cohort followed over time
- including at least two time points
- does not tell age differences
- age within group variability
-everyone is averaged into one score
- does not address time of measurement and cohort effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

attrition

A

→ mortality; reason for participant dropping out
- were they different in a fundamental way?
- a design limitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

longitudinal limitation

A

does not take into account for social or historical factors; inability to differentiate changes due to age and the effect of social or historical events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

selective attrition

A

people are dropping out of different groups at different times
- averages who have died are no longer there making averages increases
- average becomes the score of the survivors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

practice effects

A

scores become better due to practicing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cross-sectional design

A

conducted at a single point in time
- a score for 1960, 1950, 1940 cohorts
- outcome declines with each decade
- don’t know if it is a function of age, time of measure, cohort effect
- most frequent design used → relatively cheap and simple
- take into account environmental factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

sequential design

A

look systematically at age, time of measurement, cohort
- a sequence of studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

cohort sequential design

A

cohorts are compared at different ages
- age and cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

time sequential design

A

the data are organized by age and time of measurement
- age effects at different times of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

cross sequential design

A

cohorts are examined at different times of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

correlational design

A

relationships are observed among variables as they exist in the world
- cannot determined cause and effect

21
Q

correlation coefficient

A

indicates direction and strength of relationship
- closer value is to 0 is weaker; closer value is to 1 is stronger
- valence- positive or negative

22
Q

correlation does not

A

equal causation

23
Q

multivariate

A

more than IV, one DV
- allow us to identify a set of predictors that have a statistically significance to the outcome
- how variables work together

24
Q

multiple regression

A

appropriate when there are many factors for one outcome

25
logistic regression
allows us to access the likelihood of an individual receiving a yes or no response - correlational to categorical variables
26
mediation
refers to a third variable explaining the relationship between the independent and dependent variables - cognitive process - why is something happening?
27
moderation
when the effect of the variable depends on the effect of another variable - under what circumstances does another variable affect another - the affective age may depend on sex
28
path analysis
- arrows are us telling the program we expect what relationships - a specific path wanted to be tested - data either fits the model or does not - similar to multiple regression by accessing multiple variables at one time - difference is it can address relationships between independent variables
29
structural equation modeling
- latent variables- is not independent but comes from responses of other variables - can be used with path analysis interchangeably most of the time - only has to be done once
30
hierarchical linear modeling
- allows for modeling individual change over time - allows us to look at many factors at once - larger variables that impact us in the moment
31
qualitative studies
- providing a written response; responding to open-ended questions - thinking, saying, and how they are interacting - thoughts, feeling, emotions in the language they produce
32
archival research
- gathering data from medical records; it already exists - cannot control quality of data -records could be partially complete, damaged, not culturally appropriate questions
33
surveys
- allow us to access a lot of people relatively cheaply - quantitative and qualitative factors - can vary, flexible - reach a large amount of people - people might not be paying attention, could be confused, answer randomly, lying
34
epidemiological studies
- prevalence of diseases in populations or location - public health statistics - give connection to origin; rate of transmission - prevalence and incidence
35
prevalence
estimate of percentage of who ever had symptoms in a given period
36
incidence
estimate of percentage who first develop symptoms in a given period -first time a symptom had arisen - long covid
37
case reports
- extremely detailed, look at rare cases - oliver sacks: beautiful detail of individual cases - not really valuable for greater population; will not apply to general population - give new information about specific cases
38
focus groups
- qualitative methods, answer questions from facilitator - get people to start talking about particular phenomenon - useful when we do not have a good understanding of what we are dealing with
39
daily diaries
- used to use beepers - when notification was received, had to write down a response - allows us to model what individuals do in a specific day - access multiple people at multiple times of measurement - randomly assign data collection times - capture intraindividual difference
40
observational
- what they look like in the real world - structured, naturalistic, laboratory - possibly to randomly select observations - see patterns that would not be seen by another method
41
meta-analysis
- units are not from individual people but from individual studies - sample = how many separate studies are reviewed - get beyond about what one study suggested but looking at numerous - confidence intervals give margin of error for observed effect - studies assess the relationship between independent and dependent variables - overlap of whiskers share converging findings in other studies
42
reliability
yields consistent results every time it is used - expect similar outcomes
43
test-retest reliability
determined by giving the test on two occasions to assess whether respondents receive similar scores across both administrations
44
internal consistency
indicates whether respondents answer similarly on comparable items.
45
validity
the test measures what it is supposed to measure.
46
content validity
an indication of whether a test designed to assess factual material accurately measures that material ex. breakfast & IQ
47
criterion validity
indicates whether a test score accurately predicts performance on an indicator measure, as would be used in a test of vocational ability that claims to predict success on the job
48
construct validity
used to assess the extent to which a measure intended to assess a psychological construct is able to do so.
49
ethics in research
- informed consent - right to withdraw - confidentiality - debriefing any form of deception - suggest resources