Ch. 4 - Perceiving Persons Flashcards
(54 cards)
Social perception
The process by which people come to understand each other
based on:
- Evidence
- Attributions
- Integration
- how our impressions dictate our reality (confirmation biases)
Behavioural Scripts
Specific contexts where things are expected or not
Behavioural Evidence
- People are good at identifying actions based on Movement
- Mind Perception
- Nonverbal Behaviour
Mind Perception
The attribution of Human-Like mental states and capacities to animate and inanimate things, including humans
Based on two Dimensions
- Agency (ability to plan and execute behaviour)
- Experience (Ability to feel and sense)
* Participants rated various human and non-human objects’ on the extent of their mental abilities and how much they liked/valued/wanted to protect it
Agency
Perceived ability to plan and execute behaviour
Experience
Perceived ability to feel and sense (physical and mental)
Nonverbal Behaviour
Facial, vocal, and bodily behaviour that shows feelings
- mostly universal, but can be culturally variable (e.g. hungarian head-shakes)
- accurately judged by most people for things like IQ, personality, and disorders
Eye Contact
most important of nonverbal behaviours
- humans are incredibly sensitive to eye contact
- can show positive and negative things, depending on context
Best ways to find truth and deception
Make sure they’re cognitively taxed while questioning them
- Still difficult to accurately see most of the time
Attribution theory
We come up with attributions to explain behaviours
focus on intent (unintentional or intentional) and whether or not it reflects beliefs, personality or mental state
Attributions
explanations for peoples’ actions
The two types of Causal attributions
Personal Attributions
Situational attributions
Personal Attributions
Attributions based on an individual’s internal qualities like mood, personality, ability
Situational Attributions
Attributions based on external events, like a task, other people, or luck
Correspondence theory
How we try to see someone’s actions in relation to their traits
Factors:
- Degree of Choice
- Degree of Expectedness
- Intended Effects
how does the Degree of Choice show someone’s traits
Freely chosen behaviour is more informative than coerced
how does the Degree of Expectedness show someone’s traits
How much of a departure from the social norm is this?
How do Intended Effects show someone’s traits
What does one expect to achieve through their behaviours?
- acts that produce many desirable outcomes are less telling than those that produce few
Covariation Principle
In order for something to be the cause of a behaviour, it must be present when the behaviour occurs and absent when it doesn’t
Covariation theory
Covariation Theory
+ 3 types of covariation:
- Consensus
- Distinctiveness
- Consistency
Consensus Covariation
How much someone is affected by other peoples’ opinions
- high consensus = more effected by others’ opinions
Distinctiveness covariation
How someone’s overall opinions about other things effect their views
- high distinctiveness is when one is critical of other things and appreciates uniqueness
Consistency covariation
How someone’s opinion is affected by context and holds up over time
- high in consistency is when someone likes something all of the time
System 1 thought
Quick, easy, and automatic thought
- like intuition