Ch. 4 Stop & Frisk (Q1/Midterm) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between a 4th Amendment stop and a 4th Amendment frisk?

A

Stop - brief detention (minimal seizure)

Frisk - “once-over-lightly” pat down of outer clothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the purpose of a frisk?

A

To protect officers by taking away suspects’ weapons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stops are the { } intrusive 4th Amendment seizure of persons.

A

Least

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the relationship between invasion and objective basis?

A

Greater invasion = greater objective basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A reasonable explanation for why an officer initiated a stop based on some minimum objective justification/basis.

A

What is reasonable suspicion?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 2 clauses of the 4th Amendment?

A

1) Reasonableness clause
2) Warrant clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 2 prongs of the reasonableness test for warrantless searches and seizures?

A

1) Balancing element
2) Objective basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Another name for the totality-of-circumstances test.

A

What is the “whole picture test?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Suspicion that points to an individual.

A

What is individualized suspicion?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The case that started the notion of stop and frisk.

A

What is Terry v. Ohio?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Because stops and frisks are “minor” searches and seizures, they require { } facts to back up than for arrests and full-fledged searches.

A

Fewer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are Terry Stops based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause?

A

Reasonable suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the central consideration of the 4th Amendment according to Terry v. Ohio?

A

Reasonableness of all circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 2 elements of a reasonable stop?

A

1) Short/reasonable duration
2) “On-the-spot” investigation (investigation occurs where stop was made)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Adams v. Williams (1972) add to the stop-and-frisk rule introduced in Terry v. Ohio?

A

Adams v. Williams added that stop & frisk may be based on confidential informant info (hearsay) AND the officer’s direct observation established in Terry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasonable suspicion is the { }{ } for a stop.

A

1) Objective
2) Basis

17
Q

Reasonableness of a stop is assessed through this test.

A

What is the totality-of-circumstances (whole picture) test

18
Q

Reasonable suspicion = { } suspicion + { } suspicion

A

1) Individualized
2) Categorical

19
Q

Why is categorical suspicion NEVER enough to establish reasonable suspicion?

A

Categorical suspicion is based on profiling

20
Q

Is the location of a stop significant to whether it is valid or not? Why?

A

Yes; it is easier to make a stop in a high-crime area

21
Q

What are the 3 objective quantifiable approaches to whether a stop is valid based on location?

A

1) Criminal activity
2) Geography & timing
3) Criminal activity/officer observation link

22
Q

Lists of characteristics that drug traffickers supposedly possess.

A

What are drug courier profiles?

23
Q

According to Reid v. Georgia (1980), why is a drug courier profile by itself not enough to amount to reasonable suspicion?

A

Drug courier profiles are only categorical suspicions

24
Q

What are the 3 elements of a lawful frisk?

A

1) Lawful stop
2) Reasonable suspicion of armed/dangerous suspect
3) Search limited to light, over-the-clothes patdown

25
What does the balancing ideal for frisks state regarding a frisk’s reasonableness?
Reasonableness of frisk depends on balancing the government's interest in protecting officers against the individual's right to not be touched by an officer
26
Are frisks done to find evidence?
NO
27
What was the consensus of Maryland v. Wilson (1997) regarding traffic stops?
Officers can absolutely order passengers to step out of a vehicle since traffic stops can be rather dangerous for the officers
28
What is the 3-pronged balancing test to determine whether roadblocks and checkpoints are reasonable, and what case established this test?
1) Gravity of public interest served by seizure 2) Effectiveness of seizure in advancing public interest 3) Degree of interference w/ stopped individual's liberty Michigan v. Sitz (1990)
29
Between these 3 checkpoints, which one is NOT reasonable? (1) DWI checkpoints, (2) drug interdiction checkpoints, and (3) information-seeking checkpoints.
(2) Drug interdiction checkpoints
30
According to Michigan v. Sitz, why are sobriety checkpoints reasonable?
They require no individualized suspicion because limiting drunk/intoxicated driving is a matter of public interest
31
Why did City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000) conclude that drug interdiction checkpoints were bad?
Because they just lack suspicion overall
32
According to Illinois v. Lidster (2004), why are hit-and-run checkpoints constitutional unlike drug interdiction checkpoints seen in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond?
Because hit-and-run checkpoints are NOT for crime control but for asking the public info about a crime committed by others
33
Due to strong government interest in controlling who and what comes into the U.S.'s borders, what 2 things do routine border detentions not require reasonable suspicion for?
1) Searches of purses, wallets, and pockets 2) Up-close dog sniffs