changing Family Patterns (11-15) Flashcards
(20 cards)
Divorce
- since 1960s, increases in divorce
- one reason for fall in divorces since the 1990s is that fewer people are marrying, choosing to cohabit instead.
- about 65% of petitions for divorce come from women.
- couples whose marriages are at risk are, those who married young, have a child before marriage/cohabit, and those who have been married before.
Divorce, Explanations for the increase
- changes in the law
- declining stigma and attitudes
- secularisation (decline in religion/influence in society)
- rising expectation of marriage, Fletcher argues higher expectations people place on marriage today are a major cause of rising divorce rates.
- women’s increased financial dependence
- feminist explanations
- modernity and individualisation
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, the new right
- see a high divorce rate as undesirable because it undermines marriage and the nuclear family, which they regard as vital to social stability.
- in their view, high divorce rate creates growing underclass of welfare-dependant female lone parents who are burden to state and leaves boys without adult male role model they need.
- believe also results in poorer health and educational outcomes for children.
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, feminists
- see as desirable because shows women breaking free from the oppression of the patriarchal nuclear family.
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, postmodernists/individualisation thesis
- see high rate as showing that individuals now have the freedom to choose to end a relationship when it no longer meets their needs.
- see as major cause of greater family diversity.
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, functionalists
- argue high rate not necessarily threat to marriage as a social institution. Simply the result of peoples higher expectations of marriage today.
- high rate of re-marriages shows people continuing to commitment to the idea of marriage.
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, interactionists
- aims to understand what divorce means to individual.
- Morgan argues we cannot generalise about meaning of divorce,because every individuals interpretation of it is different.
Divorce - the meaning of a high divorce rate, the personal life perspective
- accepts divorce can cause problems, such as financial difficulties (especially for women) and lack of daily contact between children/non-resident parents.
- however, Smart argues divorce has become normalised and that family life can adapt to it without disintegrating.
Partnerships - reasons for changing patterns of marriage, changing attitudes to marriage
- less pressure to marry, more freedom for individuals to choose the type of relationship they want.
- now a wide spread belief that the quality of a couples relationship is more important than its legal status.
Partnerships - reasons for changing patterns of marriage, secularisation
- churches in favour of marriage, but as influence gradually declines people feel freer to choose not to marry.
Partnerships - reasons for changing patterns of marriage, declining stigma attached to alternatives to marriage
- cohabitation, remaining single, and having children before marriage are all now widely acceptable, so that pregnancy no longer leads to a shotgun wedding.
Partnerships - reasons for changing patterns of marriage, changes in the position of women
- many better educational and career prospects, many women less economically dependant on men.
- gives greater freedom not to marry.
- feminist view is an oppressive patriarchal institution may also dissuade some from marrying.
Partnerships - reasons for changing patterns of marriage, fear of divorce
- with rising divorce rate, some may be put off marrying because see increased likelihood of marriage ending in divorce.
Partnerships - cohabitation
- cohabiting couples with children are fast growing family type.
- about 1/8 adu;to now cohabiting , double 1996 number
- about 1/5 cohabitants are ‘serial cohabitants’ who have had another cohabitation prior.
Partnerships - reason for increased cohabitation
- young more likely to accept cohabitation
- secualrisation
- result in declined stigma to not get married
Partnerships - chosen families
⭐️weeks
- argues increased social acceptance may explain a trend toward same-sex cohabits/stable relationships that resemble those found among heterosexuals.
- weeks sees gays as crating families based on the idea of friendship as kinship, where friendship becomes a type of kinship network.
- describes as chosen families, argues they offer same security/stability as heterosexual families.
Partnerships - how have same-sex realtionships changed since the 1970s?
⭐️Weston
- describes same sex cohabitation as ‘quasi-marriage’ and notes many gay couples now deciding to cohabit as stable partners.
- contrasts gay lifestyle of 1970s, largely rejecting monogamy and family life in favour of casual relationships.
Partnerships - impact of legal acceptance of same-sex couples
⭐️Allan/crow
- argue because of absent framework until recently, same sex had to negotiate commitment/responsibilities more than married couples. May have made same sex more flexible/less stable than heterosexual relationships.
Partnerships - why might some gay people see legal recognition of same sex relationships as limiting?
⭐️Einasdottir
- notes gays/lesbians welcome opportunities to have their partnership legally recognised, others fears may limit flexibility/negotiability of relationships.
- rather than adopt what they see as heterosexual relationship norms, wish relationships to be different.