Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Social Psychology > Chap 4-5 > Flashcards

Chap 4-5 Flashcards

1
Q

Overconfidence bias

A

Tendency to have greater confidence in our judgments & decisions than actual accuracy warrants (experts too)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dunning-Kruger effect (double-curse of incompetence)

A

Ppl unskilled in domain lack metacognitive ability to realize they r incompetent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Selective attention

A

Act of focusing awareness onto particular aspects of experience, to exclusion of everything else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Snap judgements

A

Rate face on trustworthiness, competence, aggressiveness, likability, & attractiveness

Judgements same whether between 100 & 1000ms , or unlimited time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimensions to evaluate faces

A

1) trustworthiness (approach or avoid)

2) dominance (physical strength)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Baby faces

A

Infantile features -> nurturing response

In adults : assumed to be warmer, more honest, naïve, weaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thin slices of behaviour

A

Quick judgements similar to judgments made after long time (good prediction of future sometimes)
Eg: personality from look of bedroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caveats of snap judgments

A

1) Mixed findings
2) Some traits more accessible than others
3) First impression studies -> aggregates, not individuals
4) Self-fulfilling prophecies (our own behaviour towards someone may in turn influence the way they act towards us, as we expect them to act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Behavioural Confirmation

A

Own behaviour unknowingly causes the effect we expected to observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Misleading firsthand info

A

1) self fulfilling prophecies (behavioural confirmation)

Act in ways that don’t reflect true attitudes & beliefs (misleading)
2) impression management
3) attempts to build rapport

4) pluralistic ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pluralistic Ignorance

A

Ppl act in way that conflicts with private beliefs, cuz falsely think that their own beliefs conflict with beliefs of group (but maybe everyone think the same)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Judgments

A

1) Limited, Incomplete
2) Misleading (first-hand info & second-hand info)
3) Affected by way info is Framed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Framing effects (definition)

A

Way info is presented (strongly influence judgements)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misleading secondhand info

A

Ppl transmit info in way that furthers personal or ideological agenda (eg: news coverage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

News coverage (misleading secondhand info)

A

1) Emphasis on negative & sensational (if it bleeds it leads)
2) Selective reporting
3) Leading questions (confirmation bias: want to confirm what they want to be true)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Primacy effect (order effect)

A

Initial info presented in body of evidence colours interpretation of subsequent info

-> disproportionate influence on judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Recency effect (order effect)

A

Last info presented = better remembered, thus disproportionate influence on judgement

-> more likely when large gap between 2 pieces of info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Gestalt school

A

“The whole is greater than the sum of its parts”

When trying to make sense of world around us, mind perceive objects as elements of more complex systems, not simply focus on on every small component (eg: white triangle seen in white space between black jagged edges)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Framing effects (types)

A

1) Order effects (primacy & recency effects)

2) Gestalt school (whole>sum of parts)

3) Spin Framing (positive & negative framing)

4) Temporal Framing (Construal-Level Theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Construal-Level Theory

A

1) Higher-Level construal:
Abstract terms (psychologically distant actions & events)

2) Lower-Level construal:
Concrete terms (psychologically close at hand actions & events)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Belief perseverance

A

Ppl interpret evidence as to maintain their initial beliefs
1) Scrutinize disconfirming evidence & accepting confirming evidence
2) Confirming evidence: relevant & reliable
Disconfirming evidence: irrelevant & unreliable
3) Remembering strengths of confirming evidence & weaknesses of disconfirming evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Bottom-up processing

A

Stimulus -> Perception
Data-driven approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Top-Down processing

A

Pre-existing knowledge -> Perception
Theory-driven approach
Meaning of stimuli actively construed (not passively recorded)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Person Schemas

A

Contain info about specific individuals (appearance, personality, likes, dislikes, behaviours)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Event Schemas & Scripts

A

Let us how what we can expect in given situation & how we should behave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Schemas (examples)

A

1) Person-schema
2) Self-schema
3) Event schema & scripts

27
Q

Priming (definition)

A

Exposure to stimuli that activate or bring to mind particular schema
(May be done Subliminally: below threshold of awareness)

28
Q

Primes (examples)

A

1) Words
2) Features of environment
3) Cultural symbols
4) Bodily sensations

29
Q

Critical lures

A

Representative items of thematic, stereotypical scenes

30
Q

Behavioural priming

A

Idea that subtle priming of concepts or schemas can influence behaviour

BUT replication failures

Redemption:
1) Work is ongoing (modest effects, self-relevance of schema, primes with direct vs metaphorical meaning)
2) Artificial lab settings vs real-life

31
Q

Frequent activation & chronic accessibility

A

Frequent activation of schema -> chronic accessibility
More likely to shape perceptions of & interactions with the world

1) Heightened attention to schema-related cues (eg: rejection)
2) Interpretation of ambiguous info as rejection (construal)
3) Behaviours that bring about actual rejection (self-fulfilling prophecy)

32
Q

Intuitive System of thinking (system 1)

A

1) Quick & automatic
2) Little or no effort
3) No sense of automatic control
4) Carries out operations in parallel (background)

33
Q

Rational System of thinking (System 2)

A

1) Slower & controlled
2) Based on rules & deduction
3) Subjective experience of agency & concentration
4) Performs operations serially

Can step in for intuitive system if not work adequately

34
Q

Automatic Processes (intuitive processing)

A

1) Deal with adaptive problems
2) Automatize certain behaviours
3) Critical for effective interpersonal judgements (accuracy of thin slice judgement impeded by deliberation)

35
Q

Heuristics

A

Mental shortcuts, rules of thumb, to make rapid, good enough judgments & decisions

36
Q

Availability Heuristic

A

More easily recalled, more likely it seems (if examples recalled quickly & easily, must be many of them)

Overconfidence bias: think of why smtg true, then seem more true (so do opposite)

37
Q

Biased assessments of risk

A

Availability heuristic + over-representation negative & sensationalism = skewed assessments of risk

38
Q

Representativeness Heuristic

A

Tendency to judge likelihood of target being part of larger category based on how typical (representative) it is of category

Member of category should resemble category prototype

Useful if: prototype valid, members of category cluster around prototype (but might neglect other useful sources of info)

39
Q

Prototype

A

Typical example of smtg

40
Q

Base-rate information (neglect of)

A

Info about relative frequency of events or members of diff categories in population

Savvy judgments: representativeness + base-rate info

41
Q

Illusory Correlation

A

Belief that 2 variables are correlated when they are not

Result of Availability Heuristic (instances readily available) + Representativeness Heuristic (perception of cause & effect)

42
Q

Causal attribution

A

Linking event to cause
(Inferring that personality trait responsible for behaviour)

-predication & control (understanding cause -> prediction of future behaviour, events)

43
Q

Explanatory style

A

Person’s habitual way of explaining events

3 dimensions:
1) Internal/external (attribution, depends on covariation principle)
2) Stable/unstable
3) Global/specific

Pessimistic: negative events as internal, stable, global (undesirable life outcomes)

Optimism: better health & life satisfaction outcomes

44
Q

Internal/external explanatory styles

A

Internal attribution: Cause smtg to do with me

External attribution: cause is other ppl, circumstances, smtg in environment

45
Q

Stable/Unstable explanatory styles

A

Stable: cause long-lasting, permanent, recurring

Unstable: cause product of specific & temporary circumstances

46
Q

Global/Specific explanatory styles

A

Global: Cause generalized to other events, domains of life

Specific: Cause specific to this one event

47
Q

Controllability

A

To what extent have control over the cause of event

Predictor of depression
Adaptive attributional tendencies -> positive effects

48
Q

Learned Helplessness

A

State of passive resignation to aversive situation that one come to believe is out of one’s control

49
Q

Gender differences in attributions about controllability

A

Boys: failure due to lack of effort
Girls: failure due to lack of ability

Cuz of difference in feedback from teachers

50
Q

Field of Forces (human behaviour)

A

B=f(P,E)
Behaviour (B) is a function of the person (P) & the person’s environment (E)

51
Q

Covariation principle

A

Behaviour attributed to potential causes that occur at same time (multiple opportunities for observation)

Attributions - 3 criteria:
1) Consensus: many others engage in behaviour (No-low consensus-suggests smtg about person)
2) Distinctiveness: behaviours unique to this particular situation
(No-low distinctiveness-suggests smtg about person)
3) Consistency: engage in behaviour regularly across time (Yes-high consistency-suggests smtg about person)

52
Q

Dispositional Attributions

A

Cause Internal to actor:
1) low consensus
2) low distinctiveness
3) high consistency

53
Q

Situational Attributions

A

Cause external to actor:
1) high consensus
2) high distinctiveness
3) high consistency

54
Q

Discounting Principle

A

Tendency to assign less weight to cause of behaviour if other potential causes

55
Q

Augmentation principle

A

Tendency to assign greater weight to cause of behaviour if other potential causes that would normally produce diff outcome

56
Q

Self-serving attributional bias

A

Inclination to make situational attributions for failures but dispositional attributions for successes (maintain positive self-image, but problems in relationships & work)

57
Q

Self-Presentation advantage

A

Those with social power initiate, steer conversations, & select situations

Others overestimate their knowledge, intelligence, skill

58
Q

Errors & Biases in attribution

A

1) Self-serving attributional bias
2) Fundamental attribution error (neglect environments role in cause of behaviour of person -only disposition)
3) Self-presentation avantage

59
Q

Causes of FAE

A

1) Motivational influences (Just-world hypothesis)

2) Perceptual Salience: causes more salient more likely to be seen as potential causes of observed effects (ppl more salient than features of environment)

3) Automatic vs Effortful Cognition:
Dual-process model (thinking fast vs slow) - rapidly, automatically characterize ppls based on behaviour, only after consciously ponder situation, adjust initial inference (if sufficient mental resources)

60
Q

Just-world hypothesis

A

Belief that ppl get wat they deserve in life & deserve what they get

61
Q

Salience

A

More likely to capture our attention

62
Q

Culture & Causal Attribution

A

Independent cultures (western Europe, present & former nations of British commonwealth):
1) Personal agency
2) See others & selves in terms of personal goals, attributes, preferences

Interdependent cultures (east & South Asia, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Latin America):
1) connection to others
2) see others & selves in terms of social roles, obligations to other ppl & institutions

63
Q

Actor-Observer Difference

A

Degree to which oriented towards person vs situation depends on actor (engaged in action yourself) or observer (just observing someone else)

Actor: more interested in situation (situational attributions)

Observer: more interested in person ur dealing with (dispositional attributions)

64
Q

Actor-Observer diff (causes)

A

1) Interpret question differently (considering who u r, why chose psych?)
2) Perceptual Salience (person draws more attention than environment)
3) Different access to info
-Intentions (self: known, others: not)
-Typicality (better position to know if behaviour distinctive)

Social Psychology (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions