CHAPTER 1 - research methods Flashcards

1
Q

IV

A

independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DV

A

dependant variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

IV - definition

A

variable that is manipulated to measure the effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DV - definition

A

the observed variable impacted by the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

extraneous variable

A

random variable with impact on the DV?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

population

A

entire group research interest, from which a sample is drawn, sample results are generalised to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sample

A

part of the population selected for research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

random sampling

A

members of population are chosen at random

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

convenience sampling

A

basically they’re just convenient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stratified sampling

A

selecting participants from subgroups of population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

controlled experiment

A

investigation of cause-effect relation ship of IV and DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

controlled group

A

not exposed to IV in controlled conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

experimental group

A

exposed to IV under experimental conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

controlled experiment designs types:

A

between subjects, within subjects, mixed design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

between subjects design

A

each participant is in either one or the other group (controlled or experiment) NOT BOTH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

between subjects positives:

A

experiment can be completed on one occasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

between subjects negatives:

A

needs a larger sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

within subjects design

A

each participant experiences both controlled and experiment groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

within subjects positive:

A

smaller number of participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

within subjects negative:

A

purpose of the experiment may be obvious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

mixed design:

A

combines features of both a between subjects design and a within subjects design, so the researcher can assess potential differences between separate groups of participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

mixed design positives:

A

fewer participants are needed for the experiment, and results are more precise & detailed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

mixed design negatives:

A

requires more expertise to manage the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

research methods: correlational studies

A

investigation of relationship between variables without control over the setting where the relationship occurs (no manipulation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
correlational study positive:
results are more realistic (outside a lab setting)
26
correlational suited negative:
firm conclusions on cause-effect relationship can't be drawn (only possible causes)
27
research methods: descriptive methods types:
observational study, case, case study, self report
28
self report:
participant's answers to questions presented by the researcher
29
types of self reports:
interview, questionnaires, focus groups
30
self reports positives:
efficient collection of data from all people
31
self report negatives:
relies on people being completely self aware and honest
32
observational study:
collection of data by carefully watching and recording behaviour without intervention
33
natural and contrived settings:
natural: records behaviour in real world contrived: records behaviour in artificial environment
34
observational studies positives:
researchers can record everyday behaviour without a need for intervention
35
observational studies negatives:
observer bias may be present (distorts what they see)
36
case studies:
intrusive, in-depth investigations of behaviours, problems in the interest of an individual, organisation or group
37
case studies positives:
can be conducted over a long period of time
38
case studies negatives:
can't test the cause-effect relationship like in controlled experiment
39
ERRORS
40
systematic errors:
producers by a factor that consistently favours one condition rather than another
41
systematic errors impact:
accuracy
42
random errors:
due to a chance factor
43
random errors impact:
effecting precision of measurements
44
ETHICAL CONCEPTS:
beneficence, integrity, justice, non-maleficence, respect
45
beneficence:
commitment to maximising benefits and minimising risk factors
46
integrity:
commitment to honest reporting for public knowledge
47
justice:
moral obligation to ensure fair consideration of competing claims
48
non-maleficence:
avoiding cases of harm
49
respect:
considerations to which living things have intrinsic values
50
ETHICAL GUIDELINES:
confidentiality, debriefing, informed consent, use of deception, voluntary participation, withdrawal rights
51
confidentiality:
being confidential
51
debriefing:
participants understand aim of experiment and results
52
informed consent:
understands nature and purpose of experiment and potential risks
53
use of deception:
don't deceive unless true purpose of experiments is known
54
voluntary participation:
doing it voluntarily
55
withdrawal rights:
know they can withdraw at any time
56
EVALUATING DATA AND RESEARCH:
involves reproducibility, and repeatability
57
repeatability:
degree to which an experiment will give similar results if performed again
58
reproducibility:
will similar results occur under different conditions
59
VALIDITY:
extent to which a measure accurately measures what is supposed to be measured
60
types of validity:
internal and external
61
internal validity:
extent to which investigation actually investigates what it claims to
62
external validity:
extent to which results obtained can be applied beyond the sample which generated them