Chapter 10 - Attraction Flashcards
pp.277 -- 298 (34 cards)
What is the propinquity effect?
What does it increase?
a.k.a proximity
People who we see and interact with the most are likely to become our friends and lovers.
It increases familiarity (mere exposure effect)
What is functional distance in relation to the propinquity effect?
how architectural design impacts which people cross paths often
what is the mere exposure effect?
the more exposure we have to a stimulus, the more we like it.
Also works in opposite direction - additional encounter can reveal negative traits
What “fuels” a friendship/ relationship?
how does folk wisdom encapsulate this idea? and which idea dominates current literature?
a. concept of similarity
b. concept of complementarity
similarity - interests, values, attitudes, background or personality.
folk wisdom:
a. “Birds of a feather flock together”
b. “Opposites attract”
Current research shows that similarity draws people together more.
Research shows that perceived similarity is predictive of liking and attraction.
What factor influences whether or not a person picks a similar or different partner?
When might a lack of similarity be favourable?
level of commitment.
- more likely to chose similar partner for long term relationships
- “hook-ups”/ flings = favour different people (perceived as an adventure}
Reciprocal liking
- attraction
- what does it compensate for?
- what does it neutralise our bias for?
- knowing someone likes us fuels our attraction
- liking can compensate for lack of similarity
- knowing we are liked neutralises our biases towards attractive faces
Is physical attractiveness more important to men or women?
men are more likely to SAY physical attraction is important but when it comes to ACTUAL behaviour, there is no significant difference between the sexes.
Which facial characteristics are commonly found to be attractive?
- symmetry. this is because they may be an indication of good health and reproductive fitness
The power of familiarity
- like faces which resemble our own
- preference for safe over the unknown
- propinquity + similarity & reciprocal liking
Examples of “pretty privilege” in research
- more attractive infants receiving more nurture thus having better health outcomes
- attractive ppl earn 10-15% more than below average appearance
- winning elections
What is the halo effect?
cognitive bias where we assume that an individual with one positive characteristic also possess other (often unrelated) positive characteristics.
Applies online too. Assume that “What is beautiful is good”.
evolutionary psychology
explaining social behaviour in terms of genetic factors which have evolved over time according to the principles of natural selection
sex differences
- males and females have different agendas when selecting mates due to their roles in reproducing and raising offspring
- reproduction is costly and time consuming for women but low cost, short term investment for men
- male’s reproductive success based on quantity of offspring
- females success based on raising young into maturity
David Buss et al. (1988) “states that finding & keeping a mate requires one to display resources”. What do men vs women look for ?
what are the three traits which are similar across genders?
Due to high reproductive costs, women are likely to choose men with economic & career achievements. These are resources which aid the raising of a child.
Men favour women who look like they can reproduce successfully ( age & health denote reproductive fitness)
honesty, trustworthiness and a pleasant personality.
alternative perspectives on sex differences
- women too
- conditioning
- status
- evolutionary advantages of multiple partners should apply to women too
- social conditioning teaches men to value physical attractiveness more not evolution
- women may depend on men for financial support and power in less wealth economies
Finkel and Eastwick (2009) found that when college female participants did the approaching in a speed dating scenario, they were excited about their prospective mates and less selective than when males approached.
What does this say about the evolutionary explanation?
sex differences in mates does not reflect evolution/ biology. It is influenced by societies’ tendency to have men approach women first.
approaching gives one control and being approached fuels the feeling of being “in demand” and having options.
What effect does having an electronic device present have on social interaction?
- Less connection, trust & empathy for the other person.
- decreased levels of trust,
How is propinquity affected by the online era?
- physical distance is less of an obstacle
- the internet means we are more indirectly connected to friends of friends through “degrees of separation” - there are less DOS in the modern age (impacting propinquity)
How is similarity affected by the online era?
In the study by Taylor et al. (2011) popular participants were more likely to message…
…other popular participants. Reiterating the finding that we tend to approach those who look similar to us and have a similar level of attractiveness (same league).
How is familiarity affected by the online era?
Norton et al. (2007)
–> familiarity promotes attraction via there mere exposure effect + increased encounters can reveal negative traits thus reducing attraction
- “less is more”: the more familiar participants became post-date, the more they realised that the things in their date’s online profile was inaccurate.
- noticing more incompatibilities and dissimilarities lead to a decrease in average liking rates
What are the three factors which are contributing to the acceptability and increased popularity of online dating in modern times?
online dating websites provide 3 services:
1) aggregating large number of profiled for browsing
2) opportunity for communication with potential mates
3) matching users based on analyses of compatibility.
81% of participants in a study indicated that their online dating profiles were inaccurate.
which factors (in order) do ppl lie about?
- weight
- age
- height
no gender differences. Falsification of profiles was intentional.
Women are more likely to unconsciously falsify their photos. True or false?
how were the photos falsified?
True. Self-report of accuracy of pictures wasn’t an accurate predictor of actual profile accuracy.
32% photos were misleading according to current physical appearance.
- looking thinner
- more hair in profile
- retouched/ airbrushed photos
What are the indictors that a profile is more likely to be falsified? ( Toma & Hancock., 2012)
- fewer first-person pronouns e.g. I and me
- -> they want to psychologically distance themselves from their half truths. - use of negation or negative turns of phrase; e.g. “not judgemental” instead of “open-minded”.
- Fewer total words than accurate profiles