Chapter 10: Aversive control Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

Positive punishment

A

behaviour decreases due to the presentation of consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

negative punishment

A

behaviour decreases due to removal of consequences

  • time out
  • response cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

negative reinforcement

A
  • behaviour increases due to the removal of consequences (escape or avoid punisher)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

punishment is not equal to _______

A

retribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

behavioural punishment should not be _____

A

vindictive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

time out

A

removal of reinforcers or availability of reinforcers

  • short usually better
  • negative punishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

point loss experiment

A

lever press responding of college students reinforced on a variable interval schedule w/ points that could be exchanged for money

during baseline phase, only S^D was presented (discriminative stimulus)

During next phase, S^D present in alternation with a punishment stimulus (S^Dp), during which the VI schedule remained in effect but each response was also punished by point loss

decrease in responding during SDp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

key features of aversive stimuli

A

most research done with shock

  • easy to control amount
  • simple setup
  • consistently aversive w/o damage
  • uncomfortable (usually not very painful)
  • only used when necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

punisher intensity

A

stronger punisher will produce greater decreases in behaviour

  • ceiling effect
  • importance of appropriate level
  • punisher should STOP behaviour when it occurs
  • do not start low and “ramp up”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contingent vs. independent aversive stimulation

A

Aversive stimulation contingent on an instrumental response is more effective in suppressing that response than delivering aversive stimulation independent of behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

delayed punishment

A

small delays lead to huge decreases in punishment value

  • contingency
  • contiguity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

reinforcement considerations

A

most behaviours occur bc they are reinforced or reinforcing

  • generally need to remove reinforcer
  • avoid aversives that are actually reinforcing
  • allow for alternative behaviour to produce reinforcement
  • reduce motivation for bad reinforcement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

punishment is most effective when an _______ response is available

A

alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sensitivity to the reinforcer: cocaine addicted rats

A
  • cocaine addicted rats sought cocaine despite punishment

- not true for sucrose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

thorndike and the negative law of effect

A

just as reinforcement strengthens behaviour, punishment weakens behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conditioned emotional responses: theory of punishment (Estes)

A
  • punishment suppresses behaviour
  • stimuli/behaviours just before punishment = CSs
  • these stimuli elicit freezing
  • explains many (not all) punishment effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Avoidance of punishment (Dinsmoor)

A
  • punishment as a form of avoidance behaviour
  • stimuli that accompany the punished response bc aversive
  • animals avoid these stimuli by doing something besides the punished behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Premark principle of punishment

A
  • with total freedom, diff behaviours have diff probabilities of occurring
  • premack principle:
    H = high prob. response, L = low prob. response
  • if L allows H, reinforces L
    If H forces L, punishes H
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Punishment in real life

A
Ethical issues
parenting
often used incorrectly
later problems
used to prevent serious harm
20
Q

avoidance vs. classical conditioning

study

A

a CR that allows an animal to escape from a punisher will be stronger than a common CR

avoidance group could avoid US by running but the Classical group could not!

21
Q

escape

A

terminate aversive by performing response; learned 1st

22
Q

avoidance

A

prevent aversive by performing response; learned second

23
Q

Apparatus and procedure

A

A shuttle box, box has metal grab floor and is separated into 2 compartmets by an archway. Instrumental response consists of crossing back and forth from one side tot he other

Avoidance trial: if the subject makes the response required for avoidance during the CS but before the US is scheduled, the CS is turned off, and the US is committed during that trial

Escape trial: if the subject fails to make the required reposed during the CS-US interval, the scheduled shock is presented and remains on until the response occurs, whereupon both the CS and US are terminated

24
Q

2 process theory of avoidance

A

2 mechanisms:

  1. classical
  2. instrumental
25
agoraphobia
``` overgeneralized CS (open spaces, crowds) Avoidance [NR] (stay inside) ```
26
OCD
Obsession [CS] (doors unlocked) | Compulsion [NR] (repeated locking)
27
two process they and OCD
obsessions not usually directly conditioned - stress -> sensitization to threat - common intrusive thoughts obsessed over
28
difficulties with two process theory
Fear-avoidance can be difficult to extinguish - avoidance happens very quickly, little opportunity to extinguish CR may no longer be present (no fear)
29
Extinction of avoidance behaviour
- very important in behaviour therapy | - flooding
30
flooding
extinction and résponse prevention - preventing the avoidance response is key to successful extinction - duration of exposure to CS (w/o the US) determines the # of trials to extinction
31
Free operant avoidance
unsignalled shocks are avoided by making responses w/n a set period from the previous response/shock aka non discriminated avoidance
32
Theoretical accounts of avoidance behaviour
1. positive reinforcement through conditioned safety signals 2. reinforcement through reduction of shock frequency (one-process) 3. species-specific defines reactions 4. predatory imminence: defensive and recuperative behaviour
33
predatory imminence:
the perceived likelihood of being attacked by a predator | diff species-typical defence responses occur w/n diff degrees of predatory imminence
34
predatory imminence continuum
Status of predator - statues of prey 1. predator cannot appear - non aversively motivated behaviour and recuperative behaviour due to previous attack 2. predator could appear - reencounter defensive behaviour (e.g. modification of foraging patterns) 3. predator detected - post encounter defensive behaviour (e.g. freezing) 4. predator makes contact - strike -defensive behaviour (lean-jump, adenosine aggression)
35
Non-contingent punishment
very bad - leaned helplessness - inescapable punishment - experiemental neurosis - unpredicatable punishment
36
learned helplessness | Seligman and Maier (1967)
Dogs exposed to predictable but inescapable shock do not try to escape when later allowed to model for depression math anxiety
37
theories of helplessness: learned helplessness hypothesis
lack of perceived control leads to lack of motivation and contingency of future reinforcement
38
theories of helplessness: activity deficit
freezing leads to lack of response
39
theories of helplessness: attention deficit
reduces animal's attention to own behaviour
40
theories of helplessness: stimulus relations
escapable shock is okay bc of safety signals
41
alleviating helplessness
"force" subject to escape or introduce post-shock signal
42
experimental neurosis
animals exposed to unpredictable (unsignalled) punishers develop neurotic-like symptoms unpredictable punishers are stressful (hyper vigilance) model for PTSD
43
Exposure therapy for PTSD
graded exposure to trauma stimuli in controlled environment (systematic desensitization)
44
Alternatives to punishment
``` response prevention extinction DRO DRI (incompatible) DLR ```
45
Problems with punishment
- does not identify alternative behevaiour - discriminative stimuli for punishement bc stimuli for avoidance - punishsment elicits emotional response - modeling and imitation - reinforcing value of the punishment - internalizing - psychological harm from non contingence - habituation
46
benefits of punishment
"appeasement" behaviours - increase in sociality modifies attention distraction form motivator, improves mood usually very rapid
47
effective punishment
- not delayed - consistent contingency and intensitty - negative punishment is preferable - intense enough to stop behaviour - explain punishment - provide DRO reinforcement - never punish out of frustration or anger - provide safety signals/warnings - use when necessary, avoid reliance