Chapter 13 Flashcards
The Connected Mind: Social Psychology
compliance vs. obedience
- compliance: listening to someone with no authority (more likely in people we have relationships with)
- obedience: listening to someone of authority
biological and environmental factors for aggression
biological factors
- genetics
- sex
- testosterone levels
environmental factors
- culture
- societal expectations
self-serving bias
attributing success to dispositional factors, but attributing failures to situational factors
the Capilano Bridge experiment and its significance
The Capilano Bridge is a scary bridge that is high up and sways. A single confederate woman asked single men as they passed by if they would participate in her research, and gave out her number to said men. Men who were on the bridge were more likely to contact her than men who weren’t.
This experiment provides evidence that the psychological arousal of being fearful of the bridge made men feel more attracted/connected to her.
in-groups
collections of people who often cooperate together, due to having something in common (e.g. families, teams, religions, ethnicities)
cooperation and competition both serve this same purpose
survival
actor-observer bias
using dispositional attributions to explain others’ behaviours, but situational attributions to explain your own (e.g. “She failed because she’s dumb, but I failed because I’m sick.”)
Lepper’s marker experiment and its significance
Children were divided into two groups: one group in which children were given a prize for drawing, and one group where children could draw but were given no prize. The next day, children who weren’t given a prize continued to draw, but children who were given a prize were less likely to draw.
This is significant because it demonstrates that the hedonic principle with rewards can backfire. When a behaviour is already intrinsically motivated, the addition of a prize can make it extrinsically motivate (i.e. the children now expect a prize for doing something they already like doing).
the impact of experience with diversity on group biases
increased experience with diversity decreases group biases (e.g. white students with Black teachers are less likely to show discrimination to Black people)
the just-world belief
the assumption that good things happen to good people, and bad things happen to bad people
the prisoner’s dilemma
You and your friend are arrested, but the police have limited evidence against you. Without being able to communicate with your partner, you are given the choice to confess or to remain silent. If you both remain silent, you will each be sentenced to one year. If you both confess, you will each receive ten years. However, if one confesses and the other remains silent, the prisoner who confesses will be set free, and the silent prisoner will receive a 20-year sentence.
This is a classic model of competition and cooperation. Cooperation is moderately rewarded (a one-year sentence), while competition is punished (ten years). If only one of you confesses, however, the confessor is highly rewarded (freedom), while the other person is severely punished (20 years).
why humans can be truly altruistic
we have a really advanced prefrontal cortex
the Implicit Association Test
- measures biases that we are unable (not unwilling) to report ourselves
- you categorize words into groups as quickly as possible
- you’ll categorize words slower and less accurately if it doesn’t match implicit biases
the onset of human biases
- prejudice and discrimination is deeply engrained in human evolution
- present in non-human primates
- arises early in childhood
social psychology
the study of the causes and consequences of being social
social influence
the attempt to influence others
five types of aggression
- instrumental aggression: physical harm to obtain a goal (e.g. attacking someone to steal a wallet)
- relational aggression: harming one’s social standing (e.g. gossiping)
- defensive aggression: harming out of self-defence
- passive aggression: expressing hostility indirectly
- maternal aggression: unwanted offspring are killed
why some cultures are more aggressive than others
the frustration-aggression hypothesis: socioeconomic inequality (scarcity of resources)
the frustration-aggression hypothesis
- animals are aggressive when their desires are frustrated (i.e. scarcity of resources)
- e.g. Animal A frustrates Animal B’s desire for food, so Animal B attacks Animal A.
correspondence bias
assuming someone’s behaviour is due to their personal qualities, even when we know the situation has a powerful effect (e.g. saying someone isn’t smart because they failed the test, while knowing it’s a hard class)
confederate
someone who acts as a participant of an experiment, but is actually a researcher
four things that could affect Asch’s conformity study
- group biases (i.e. if the confederates are similar/different to the participant)
- personality: participants with low levels of agreeableness are more authoratative
- body language (i.e. confident/anxious confederates)
- the number of confederates that choose incorrectly (the more confederates that choose incorrectly, the more likely the participant will choose incorrectly as well)
the approval motivation and examples of it and social influence
- we want other people to like us
- we conform to norms (normative influence) because it makes us more likeable (e.g. not yelling in a restaurant)
attitude formation
- we often adopt attitudes of others to feel socially included
- attitudes have some genetic predisposition