Chapter 14 - Leadership: Styles and Behaviors Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

describes how leader–member exchange (LMX) relationships develop over time on a dyadic basis, can explain why those differences exist.5 The theory argues that new leader–member relationships are typically marked by a role taking phase

A

Leader–member exchange theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

during which the employee’s own expectations for the dyad get mixed in with those of the leader.

A

Role making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

defined as the degree to which the leader’s actions result in the achievement of the unit’s goals, the continued commitment of the unit’s employees, and the development of mutual trust, respect, and obligation in leader–member dyads.

A

Leader Effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

traits are more predictive of leader emergence (i.e., who becomes a leader in the first place) than they are of leader effectiveness (i.e., how well people actually do in a leadership role).

A

Leader emergence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the leader makes the decision alone without asking for the opinions or suggestions of the employees in the work unit.

A

Autocratic style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the leader presents the problem to individual employees or a group of employees, asking for their opinions and suggestions before ultimately making the decision themself.

A

Consultative style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which the leader presents the problem to a group of employees and seeks consensus on a solution, making sure that their own opinion receives no more weight than anyone else’s.

A

Facilitative style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the leader gives an individual employee or a group of employees the responsibility for making the decision within some page 473set of specified boundary conditions.

A

Delegative style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

suggests that the focus should shift away from autocratic, consultative, facilitative, and delegative leaders to autocratic, consultative, facilitative, and delegative situations.

A

Time-driven model of leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is the decision significant to the success of the project or the organization?

A

Decision significance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is it important that employees “buy in” to the decision?

A

Importance of commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does the leader have significant knowledge or expertise regarding the problem?

A

Leader expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How likely is it that employees will trust the leader’s decision and commit to it?

A

Likelihood of commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do employees share and support the same objectives, or do they have an agenda of their own?

A

Shared objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Do the employees have significant knowledge or expertise regarding the problem?

A

Employee expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Do the employees have the ability to work together to solve the problem, or will they struggle with conflicts or inefficiencies?

A

Teamwork skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

reflects the extent to which the leader defines and structures the roles of employees in pursuit of goal attainment.

A

Initiating structure

18
Q

reflects the extent to which leaders create job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for employee ideas, and consideration of employee feelings.

A

Consideration

19
Q

argues that the optimal combination of initiating structure and consideration depends on the readiness of the employees in the work unit.

A

Life cycle theory of leadership

20
Q

is broadly defined as the degree to which employees have the ability and the willingness to accomplish their specific tasks.

21
Q

high initiating structure and low consideration—in which case the leader provides specific instructions and closely supervises performance.

22
Q

high initiating structure and high consideration—in which the leader supplements their directing with support and encouragement to protect the confidence levels of the employees.

23
Q

low initiating structure and high consideration—becomes the optimal combination of leader behaviors.

A

Participating

24
Q

low initiating structure and low consideration—such that the leader turns over responsibility for key behaviors to the employees.

25
involves inspiring followers to commit to a shared vision that provides meaning to their work while also serving as a role model who helps followers develop their own potential and view problems from new perspectives.
Transformational leadership
26
avoidance of leadership all together
laissez-faire (hands-off) leadership
27
occurs when the leader rewards or disciplines the follower depending on the adequacy of the follower’s performance.
Transactional leadership
28
the leader waits around for mistakes and errors, then takes corrective action as necessary.
Passive management-by-exception
29
the leader arranges to monitor mistakes and errors actively and again takes corrective action when required.
Active management-by-exception
30
represents a more active and effective brand of transactional leadership, in which the leader attains follower agreement on what needs to be done using promised or actual rewards in exchange for adequate performance.
Contingent reward
31
involves behaving in ways that earn the admiration, trust, and respect of followers, causing followers to want to identify with and emulate the leader.
Idealized influence
32
involves behaving in ways that foster an enthusiasm for and commitment to a shared vision of the future.
Inspirational motivation
33
involves behaving in ways that challenge followers to be innovative and creative by questioning assumptions and reframing old situations in new ways.
Intellectual stimulation
34
involves behaving in ways that help followers achieve their potential through coaching, development, and mentoring.
Individualized consideration
35
Transformational leadership has a __________ effect on performance
Moderate positive
36
Transformational leadership has a _________ effect on commitment
Strong positive
37
suggests that certain characteristics of the situation can constrain the influence of the leader, making it more difficult for the leader to influence employee performance.
Substitutes for leadership model
38
reduce the importance of the leader while simultaneously providing a direct benefit to employee performance.
Substitutes
39
only reduce the importance of the leader; they themselves have no beneficial impact on performance.
Neutralizers
40
during which a manager describes role expectations to an employee and the employee attempts to fulfill those expectations with their job behaviors.
Role taking
41
marked by the frequent exchange of information, influence, latitude, support, and attention.
“high-quality exchange” dyad
42
judgments of leader effectiveness should gauge how effective the page 469most critical leader–member dyads appear to be.
Leader–member exchange theory