Chapter 14 - Leadership: Styles and Behaviors Flashcards
(42 cards)
describes how leader–member exchange (LMX) relationships develop over time on a dyadic basis, can explain why those differences exist.5 The theory argues that new leader–member relationships are typically marked by a role taking phase
Leader–member exchange theory
during which the employee’s own expectations for the dyad get mixed in with those of the leader.
Role making
defined as the degree to which the leader’s actions result in the achievement of the unit’s goals, the continued commitment of the unit’s employees, and the development of mutual trust, respect, and obligation in leader–member dyads.
Leader Effectiveness
traits are more predictive of leader emergence (i.e., who becomes a leader in the first place) than they are of leader effectiveness (i.e., how well people actually do in a leadership role).
Leader emergence
the leader makes the decision alone without asking for the opinions or suggestions of the employees in the work unit.
Autocratic style
the leader presents the problem to individual employees or a group of employees, asking for their opinions and suggestions before ultimately making the decision themself.
Consultative style
which the leader presents the problem to a group of employees and seeks consensus on a solution, making sure that their own opinion receives no more weight than anyone else’s.
Facilitative style
the leader gives an individual employee or a group of employees the responsibility for making the decision within some page 473set of specified boundary conditions.
Delegative style
suggests that the focus should shift away from autocratic, consultative, facilitative, and delegative leaders to autocratic, consultative, facilitative, and delegative situations.
Time-driven model of leadership
Is the decision significant to the success of the project or the organization?
Decision significance
Is it important that employees “buy in” to the decision?
Importance of commitment
Does the leader have significant knowledge or expertise regarding the problem?
Leader expertise
How likely is it that employees will trust the leader’s decision and commit to it?
Likelihood of commitment
Do employees share and support the same objectives, or do they have an agenda of their own?
Shared objectives
Do the employees have significant knowledge or expertise regarding the problem?
Employee expertise
Do the employees have the ability to work together to solve the problem, or will they struggle with conflicts or inefficiencies?
Teamwork skills
reflects the extent to which the leader defines and structures the roles of employees in pursuit of goal attainment.
Initiating structure
reflects the extent to which leaders create job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for employee ideas, and consideration of employee feelings.
Consideration
argues that the optimal combination of initiating structure and consideration depends on the readiness of the employees in the work unit.
Life cycle theory of leadership
is broadly defined as the degree to which employees have the ability and the willingness to accomplish their specific tasks.
Readiness
high initiating structure and low consideration—in which case the leader provides specific instructions and closely supervises performance.
Telling
high initiating structure and high consideration—in which the leader supplements their directing with support and encouragement to protect the confidence levels of the employees.
Selling
low initiating structure and high consideration—becomes the optimal combination of leader behaviors.
Participating
low initiating structure and low consideration—such that the leader turns over responsibility for key behaviors to the employees.
Delegating