Chapter 3- Constructing Groups Flashcards
(34 cards)
Theorem 10.1 (Cayley)
Let G be a group, and let SG be the symmetric group on the set G. For each a ∈ G the mapping σ_a : G −→ G defined by xσ_a = xa is a permutation of G. The set H = {σ_a : a ∈ G} is a subgroup of SG and is isomorphic to G.
Therefore, every group is isomorphic to a subgroup of a symmetric group.
proof:show bijective homomorphism, pg 37(The proof is probably more important
Learning:
Remark 10.3. Cayley’s theorem implies that a group of order n is isomor- phic to a subgroup of Sn. However, it often happens that G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sm for smaller than n. For example, Cayley’s theorem implies that the alternating group An is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sn!/2. However, An is also a subgroup of Sn (that is how it is defined).
A subgroup of a symmetric group is called
a permutation group.
So the alternating groups an dihedral groups are permutation groups.
Theorem 10.4.
Let F be a field, and let n be a positive integer. For a permutation σ∈Sn. define an n×n matrix Aσ =(aij) by
aij = 1 if iσ=j,
aij = 0 otherwise
The mapping f : Sn −→ GL(n,F), f(σ) = Aσ is…
Therfore…
a monomorphism. Therefore, every group of order n is isomorphic to a subgroup of the general linear group GL(n, F).
Proof pg 38+39
Definition11.1.
An action of a group G on a set X is a function:
X×G−>X, (x, g) → xg, such that the following hold:
xe=x, x(gh)=(xg)h forallx∈X, g,h∈G. We also say that G acts on X,or that X is a G-set.
Example 11.2. The symmetric group SX acts on X via…
(x, σ) → xσ.
Any group G acts on itself by
And also via
Right translation, (x, g) → xg,
where x, g ∈ G, and xg is understood as the product in G.
Conjugation (x, g) → g−1xg.
Let G be a group and H≤G.Then G acts on the set
G/H = {Ha : a∈G} of all right cosets of H via…
(Ha,g)→Hag.
Theorem 11.6.
Let G be a group that acts on a set X. The relation ∼ on X defined by…
is an equivalence relation.
x ∼ y ⇔ xg = y for some g ∈ G
Simple proof, pg 40
Let G be a group that acts on a set X. The relation ∼ on X defined by x ∼ y ⇔ xg = y for some g ∈ G is an equivalence relation.
Definition 11.7.
The equivalence classes of the relation ∼ from the previous theorem are called
Thus the … of x ∈ X is…
Orbits
C_x= ={xg : g∈G}.
If there is only 1 orbit, then we say that the action is
transitive
Definition 11.8.
The action of SX on X, given by (x, σ) → xσ is…
Likewise, the action of G on itself by right translations
transitive
The orbits of the conjugation action of G on itself are precisely
the conjugacy classes of G.
Theorem 11.9.
Let G be a group that acts on a set X. Then for any x ∈ X the set
G_x ={g∈G : xg=x}
is…
A subgroup of G
proof: subgroup test pg 40
Definition 11.10.
The subgroup Gx
G_x ={g∈G : xg=x}
is called …
the stabiliser of x.
Theorem 11.12 (Orbit–Stabiliser Theorem)
Let G be a group that acts on a set X. Then for any x∈X, the size of the orbit of x is…
equal to the number of cosets of its stabiliser:
C_x=[G : Gx]
proof short: make bijection pg 41
It follows that the sizes of orbits of G divide the order of G.
Corollary 11.13.
The size of the conjugacy class of any element in a group G…
divides the order of G.
This follows from thm 11.12
Theorem 11.14.
If a group G acts on the set X, then the mapping …….. is a homomorphism.
Conversely, if f : G → SX is a homomorphism, then the mapping ………….. is an action
f :G→SX , g→τg , xτg =xg (x∈X, g∈G)
X×G→x, (x,g)→x(f(g)) (x∈X, g∈G)
proof “short” pg 41
Definition 12.1.
Let G and H be two groups. The direct product of G and H is the set G × H with the component-wise multiplication:
(g1, h1)(g2, h2) = (g1g2, h1h2).
Theorem 12.2.(Basic properties of Direct Products)
Let G and H be any two groups…
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
(i) G×H is a group.
(ii) |G × H| = |G||H|.
(iii)The set G_BAR = {(g,eH):g∈G} is a normal subgroup of G×H, and is isomorphic to G. Similarly, the set H_BAR = {(eG,h) : h ∈ H} is a normal subgroup of G × H and is isomorphic to H.
(iv) G_BAR∩H_BAR={(eG,eH)}.
(v) G_BARH_BAR=G×H.
Proof pg 42
Definition 12.3.
A group G is directly decomposable if
there exist non-trivial groups H and K such that
G ∼= H × K; otherwise, G is directly indecomposable.
Learning:
One may ask when a group is directly decomposable. By Theorem 12.2 it follows that if G is directly decomposable then it contains two normal subgroups H and K such that H ∩K = {eG} and HK = G
We need to check what they really mean by HK
Theorem 12.4.
Let G be a group, and let H and K be two normal subgroups of G. If the following two conditions hold
i)
ii)
Then G ∼= H × K.
(i) HK=G;
(ii) H∩K={e};
proof pg 43: should learn
Theorem 12.5.
Let G be a group, and let Hi, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, be n normal subgroups of G such that the following two conditions are satisfied:
i)
ii)
Then G ∼= H1 × H2 . . . × Hn.
i) G = H1H2 …Hn;
(ii) Hi ∩(H1…Hi−1Hi+1…Hn)={e},foralli. Need to check what this means
No proof given, sim to thm 12.4