Chapter 3: The Psychology of Police Investigations Flashcards
(88 cards)
police investigation
a process whereby the police interview a suspect to gather evidence and obtain a confession
interpreting confessions in North America
In North America, a confession usually has to be backed up by some other form of evidence
impact of confessions on convictions
People who confess to a crime are more likely to be prosecuted and convicted than those who do not
coercive tactics to obtain confessions today vs. in the past
- Physically coercive tactics to obtain a confession were used in the past
- Now, police officers use more subtle, psychologically-based interrogation techniques
- Police in England and Wales are trained to use less coercive interrogation techniques than in North America
the reid model of interrogation
a nine-step model of interrogation used frequently in North America to extract confessions from suspects
who developed the reid model?
John E. Reid, a polygrapher from Chicago
three stages of the reid model
- Gather evidence related to the crime and interview witnesses and victims
- Conduct a non-accusatorial interview of the suspect to assess any evidence of deception
- Conduct an accusatorial interrogation of the suspect if they are perceived to be guilty
nine steps of the reid model
- The suspect is immediately confronted with their guilt. If the police do not have any evidence against the suspect at this time, the interrogator can hide this fact and, if necessary, imply that such evidence exists.
- Psychological themes are then developed that allow the suspect to rationalize or excuse the crime. For example, a murderer may be told that the interrogators understand why they committed the crime and that the crime was even justified (e.g., given that the victim was a known criminal “who had it coming”).
- The interrogator interrupts any statements of denial by the suspect to ensure the suspect does not get the upper hand in the interrogation.
- The interrogator overcomes the suspect’s objections to the charges.
- If the suspect becomes withdrawn, the interrogator ensures that they have the suspect’s attention and that the suspect does not tune out of the interrogation. A range of techniques can be used for this purpose, such as reducing the psychological distance between the interrogator and the suspect (e.g., by physically moving
closer to the suspect). - The interrogator exhibits sympathy and understanding, and the suspect is urged
to come clean (e.g., by appealing to the suspect’s sense of decency). - The suspect is offered explanations for the crime, which makes self-incrimination easier to achieve. For example, rather than the suspect being involved in an intentional homicide, which would carry a severe penalty, the interrogator may suggest to a murder suspect that the crime they committed was accidental (e.g., the result of an argument that simply went wrong).
- Once the suspect accepts responsibility for the crime, typically by agreeing with
one of the alternative explanations, the interrogator develops this admission into
a full confession for the crime in question. - Finally, the interrogator gets the suspect to write and sign a full confession.
Inbau et al’s other suggestions for successful interrogations
- Use a plainly decorated interrogation room to avoid distractions
- Have the evidence folder in your hand when you begin the interview
- Make sure the suspect is alone in the interrogation suite before the interrogator enters the room
premise of the Reid model
people make choices that they think will maximize their well-being given the constraints they face
goal of the reid model
to make the consequences of confession more desirable than the anxiety related to the deception
two general categories of interrogation techniques
minimization & maximization techniques
minimization techniques
soft-sell tactics used by police interrogators that are designed to lull the suspect into a false sense of security
maximization techniques
scare tactics used by police interrogators that are designed to intimidate a suspect believed to be guilty
Kassin et al., 2007 use of Reid model study
found through officer self-reports that many of the techniques in the Reid model were used in interrogations, although the frequency of use varied across techniques
King and Snook, 2009 use of Reid model and confessions study
found through objective measures that more confessions were extracted when more Reid techniques were used
potential problems with the Reid model
- It assumes that interrogators can detect deception
- investigator bias
- An increased likelihood that suspects will make false confessions
what makes someone a good deceiver?
knowing what cues to avoid
solution to improving the detection of deception
teach people how to increase the behavioural differences between truth-tellers and liars so that deception cues become more pronounced
investigator bias
bias that can result when police officers enter an interrogation setting already believing the suspect is guilty
Kassin et al., 2003 investigative biases and coercion study
found that investigative biases led to coercive interrogations that caused suspects to appear guiltier to both the interrogator and neutral observers, even when the suspect had committed no crime
Eastwood & Snook, 2010 understanding legal cautions in undergraduate students study
found that undergraduate students had difficulties understanding legal cautions, but presenting them in written format, one element at a time allowed for greater comprehension. Self-reported confidence was not a good predictor of a participant’s degree of comprehension
Eastwood et al., 2015 understanding youth waivers study
found that high school students understand less than half of the information presented in Canadian youth waivers in an oral format
interrogation practices in court
- Judges consider whether a confession was made voluntarily and whether the defendant was competent when they provided the confession
- Confessions obtained through overt forms of coercion are inadmissible in court