Chapter 3: Traits and Trait Taxamonies Flashcards
What is the dispositional domain
aspects of personality that are stable over time, relatively consistent over situation, and make people different from each other –> the study of traits
define “disposition”
inherent tendency to behave in a specific way –> interchangeable with “trait”, the building blocks of personality
what are the major questions of psychologists working the dispositional domain (5 questions)
- how many personality traits exist
- what is the best taxonomy (classification system) for traits
- how can we best discover and measure traits
- how do personality traits develop
- how do traits interact with situations to produce behaviours
what are the three fundamental questions guiding those who study personality traits
- how should we conceptualize traits
- how can we identify which traits are the most important
- how can we formulate a comprehensive taxonomy of traits (system that includes all major traits of personality)
how are traits formally conceptualized and measured by most psychologists
dimensions on which people differ –> high, low or in the middle
describe the categorical approach to conceptualizing traits
describes people strictly in terms of a limited number of personality types (e.g. Myers-Briggs)
describe how traits are “internal”
individuals carry their desires, needs and wants from one situation to the next
describe how traits are “causal”
they explain the behaviour of the individuals who possess them –> influences external behaviour
give an example of how the internal disposition view of traits separates traits from external behaviours
an individual might have a desire to take charge in social situations, but may not always express this desire –> behavioural expression does not reflect internal feeling, but capacities remain present even if not expressed
describe why viewing traits as causal is useful
saying that Mona goes to parties because she is extraverted rules out other potential reasons for behaviour (e.g. friend drags her there) –> this prevents traits from merely being descriptive summaries of actual behaviour
describe the account of traits as purely descriptive summaries
these accounts make no assumptions about internality or causality (e.g. “jealousy” is a person’s expressed behaviour, but doesn’t assume what caused the jealousy –> could be rooted feelings of insecurity, or could just be the social situation) –> need to determine important individual differences to develop causal theories to explain them
what are the two basic formulations of traits
- traits as internal causal properties
- traits as purely descriptive summaries
what is the program used by those who endorse the descriptive summary formulation of traits
the ‘act frequency approach”
describe the act frequency approach
begins with the notion that traits are categories of acts (e.g. “impulsivity” has specific acts in its category)
describe how the act frequency approach might determine if a person is “dominant”
they might videotape a subject and their friends and count up how many times each person performed a dominant act –> if the subject did more dominant acts than their peers, they would be considered dominant
what are the three main elements of the act frequency approach
act nomination, prototypicality judgement, and the recording of act performance
what is act nomination
part of the act frequency approach –> procedure designed to identify which acts belong in which trait categories (e.g. acts under the category “impulsive” could be blurting out things without thinking, acting in the spur of the moment, etc.)
what is prototypicality judgement
part of the act frequency approach –> identifying which acts are most central to, or prototypical of, each trait category (e.g. “took charge of the meeting” is more prototypically dominant than “deliberately arrived late for the meeting”)
what is recording of act performance
part of the act frequency approach –> securing information on the actual performance of individuals in their daily lives (e.g. self report, observational measures)
what are the most common critiques of the act frequency approach (2 critiques)
- the technical implementations of the approach are unclear –> does not specify how much context should be included in the description of a trait-relevant act
- seems applicable to overt actions, but what about failures to act and covert acts that are not directly observable
what has the act frequency approach contributed to research (4 things)
- it has been helpful in making explicit the behavioural phenomena to which most trait terms refer, as behavioural expressions are the primary ways we learn about traits
- helpful in identifying behavioural regularities
- helpful in exploring the meaning of some traits that are hard to study (e.g. impulsivity)
- helpful in identifying cultural similarities and differences in the behavioural manifestations of traits
describe the study looking at the relationship between self-reported act performance and observer codings of the individuals’ actual behaviour
some acts (especially those reflecting extraversion and conscientiousness) showed high levels of self-observer agreement, while acts of agreeableness showed lower self-observer agreement –> the more observable the actions, the higher the agreement between self-report and observer codings
what has the act-frequency approach been found to predict
job success, salary, promotions in the workplace, social interaction habits, mate-guarding acts, violence in marital relationships
What are the three approaches to identification of the most important traits
lexical approach, statistical approach, and theoretical approach