Chapter 3.1 Flashcards
Analyse sources and purpose of contractual terms for contracts that are created with external organisations
Express terms
Contractual terms which are specifically stated in contract documents
Implied terms
Contractual terms that exist in legislation, or are common practise and therefore a given, but are not written within the contractual documentation, i.e. the law of the land - by default, a contract must comply with the laws of the land to be legally binding
What is a contract term?
Any provision of a contract
Do contract term and term of a contract mean the same thing
No
How are express terms stated?
They are explicitly stated either orally or in writing and set out the definitive agreement between the parties
Name 1 way terms can be implied into a contract
Custom and practise
When will an express term not override an implied term
If the implied term is a legal requirement in the prevailing legislation
Name a common way for terms to be implied into a contract
Through statute
Should an agreement state whether implied terms can be overridden by express terms?
Yes
Name 2 pieces of case law that relates to how an implied term might be permitted to be overridden by an express term
- Rights of third parties: UK law contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- Right to terminate a contract that as a result of a change becomes non-compliant with EU public procurement rules
Rights of third parties: UK law contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
UK law specifically states that people who would normally benefit under a contract can enforce the terms of that contract, even though they are not party to it. There is therefore an implied term that such rights exist. However, the act goes on to say that this ‘does not apply if on a proper construction of the contract it appears that the parties did not intend the term to be enforceable by a third party. This sentence means that the parties to the contract can expressly state that they do not intend the terms to be enforceable by third parties. if they do so the implied term is cancelled out
Right to terminate a contract that as a result of a change becomes non-compliant with EU public procurement rules
Regulation 73 of the UK Public Contract regulations 2015 (enacting the EU Public Procurement Directive 2014) places a requirement on public bodies to include a right to terminate the contract in circumstances where modifications to it place it outside the parameters permitted by the regulations. The regulations go on to state that if such a right is not expressly stated in the contract, the power to terminate the contract on reasonable notice will be an implied term. There is nothing which permits the parties to agree otherwise
What are expressed terms used to do
Set out as clearly as possible what that agreement is
Name 6 things expressed terms should do
- Set out the obligations of the purchaser
- Set out the obligations of the supplier
- Set out the rights of the purchaser if the supplier defaults
- Set out the rights of the supplier if the purchaser defaults
- State how the parties will deal with circumstances beyond the control of either party
- Where possible, either confirm or override any potential implied terms
What are schedules?
Attachments to a contract which provide more detail - often technical or operational - on the requirements and are structured in such a way as to enable them to be easily updated
What does the use of schedules help to do
Clarify the difference between a ‘contract clause’ and a ‘contract term’
What is a contract clause
The precise wording in the main document, which will have its own reference number
What is a contract term
The totality of that part of the agreement and so it includes the clause wording an any schedule to which it refers
Anything set out in a schedule to a contract is also considered to be an…
express term
Name 3 issues when establishing what the express terms of a contract are
- There may be no written contract
- The written contract may be based on oral negotiations
- The purchaser may not be aware of the conditions of a written contract at the point of contract
What would the legal position be if there was no written contract and all negotiations and agreements were conducted orally?
It depends on the facts of the case, but it can be held that express statements were not intended to be contractual warranties.
What piece of case law relates to if there was no written contract and all negotiations and agreements were conducted orally
Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams 1957
Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams 1957
A man selling a car to a garage said it was a 1948 Morris when in fact it was a 1939 Morris, and he got a better price as a result. It was held that the statement of the car’s age was not an express term of the contract.
This case could also be considered in light of the rules on misrepresentation outlined in section 1.2. The decision may have hinged on the fact that the seller did not know that the log book had been changed by a previous owner, and that the garage buying the car would be more expert than the seller in estimating its age
What would the legal position be if there was a written contract based on oral negotiations
The longstanding view is that the written word supersedes anything said prior to it. The contract means exactly what it says, which is what the court interprets it to say, regardless of what the parties might have intended. However it is now possible to argue that ‘the contract’ is a contract partly in writing and partly oral; or that there are two contracts - one oral and one written. In both scenarios the argument would be that the oral part of the contract can supersede the written part.