chapter 4 Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Steps in scientific method

A
  1. Define problem and hypothesis
  2. Choose and implement method
  3. Collect and analyze data
  4. Draw conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypothesis:

A

statement predicting what will happen is a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Null hypothesis:

A

prediction that there is no relationship between phenomena

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Variables:

A

factor that can vary (dependent or independent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Operationalization:

A

the way we measure and manipulate variables (ex: how they are defined for that study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case studies:

A

detailed history of unique individuals with a psychological disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Advantage/Disadvantages of case studies

A

Advantage:
- Able to study rare problems
Disadvantages:
- Cannot be generalized to larger population
- Lacks objectivity because different researchers might notice or treat patient in different ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Correlational study:

A

examines the relationship between an independent and dependent variable (without variable manipulation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Continuous:

A

two or more continuous variables measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Group Comparison:

A

two or more groups compared on a variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cross sectional:

A

participants assessed at one point in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statistical significance:

A
  • Index of how likely a result is due to chance
  • p<.05 is the goal which means that the probability is less than 5/100 that the result occurred by chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Longitudinal:

A

participants assessed more than once over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Third variable problem:

A

an unmeasured third variable that is associated with independent and dependent variables that may be affecting the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Random sample:

A

every person in population has equal chance of being selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sample:

A

group of people taken from population we want to study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Representative Sample:

A

highly similar or representative of population we are studying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Comparison Group:

A

participants should match the treatment group in every variable except the one being tested for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of correlational research

A

Advantages:
- focus on real world situations not lab ones
- Longitudinal designs determine differences between groups before event occurs
- Ensures differences cause event and event does not cause differences
- Good external validity
Disadvantages:
- Longitudinal studies are expensive and time consuming
- Cannot infer causation
- Third variable problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Epidemiological studies:

A

a study of frequency and distribution of a disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Prevalence rate:

A

the proportion of the population that has the disorder at a given point or time

21
Q

Incidence rates:

A

Number of new cases in a disorder

22
Q

Risk factors:

A

conditions with a higher risk of a disorder

23
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of epidemiological research

A

Advantages:
- Provide info for who’s at highest risk and we can use this to test hypotheses about why they are at higher risks
Disadvantages:
- Cannot establish causation
- Third variable problem

24
Human laboratory studies:
Expose participants to an event in a lab and then determine its impact
25
Internal validity:
changes in the DV can be confidently attributed to manipulation of the IV
26
Experimental group:
the group that receives the independent variable
27
Control group:
the group that does not receive the independent variable
28
Random assignment:
all participants have an equal chance of being in the experimental or the control group
29
Demand characteristics:
participants guess the study’s purpose and change their behavior - Solutions: Can use filler measures, Cover story (basically deception), Double-blind experiments
30
Advantages/disadvantages of laboratory research
Advantages - Higher control - Random assignment Disadvantages - External validity - Ethical limitations
31
Therapy outcome studies:
experimental studies designed to test whether a specific therapy, a psychological therapy, or a biological therapy reduces psychopathology in individuals who receive it
32
Simple control group:
do not receive treatment but are still tracked
33
Waitlist control group:
- they receive treatment after the experimental group - Come to a study as a control group, and when the experiment is over they become the experimental group and receive treatment
34
Placebo control group:
receive an inactive treatment (most commonly used to test effectiveness of drugs)
35
Advantages/disadvantages of therapy outcome studies
Advantages: - Provide help to people in distress Disadvantages: - Ethical considerations for control group - Which aspect of the therapy worked? - Balancing patient’s needs with standardized treatment - External validity
36
Single-case experimental design:
one or few individuals are studied intensively
37
ABAB design:
treatment introduced, withdrawn, and then reinstated
38
Multiple baseline design:
- give treatment to the same individual but in different settings or at different points in time - Give treatment to different individuals at different points in time
39
Advantages/disadvantages of single-case experimental design
Advantages: more intensive assessment of participants Disadvantages: generalizability is limited and cannot test all hypotheses
40
Genetic studies:
identify genetic factors associated with psychopathology/ the degree to which genes play a role in a disorder
41
Family history studies:
identify people who have disorder, identify control group, trace the family tree
42
Twin studies:
compare rates of a disorder among monozygotic and dizygotic twins, and determine concordance rate
43
Adoption studies:
identify people with a disorder who were adopted shortly after birth, determine the rates of a disorder among biological relatives and adoptive relatives
44
Molecular genetic studies:
comparing DNA of people who have a disorder with a sample who do not to find a genetic characteristic or marker that might cause this disorder
45
Concordance rate:
the probability that both twins will have a disorder
46
Linkage analysis:
identify other characteristics that co-occur with the disorder and have known genetic markers
47
Cross-cultural studies
- Examines similarities and differences of psychopathology between cultures - Challenges: variation in the meaning of concepts and theories, translating assessment tools across cultures, language barriers
48
Meta Analysis:
Statistical technique to summarize results across several studies Steps: 1. Literature search 2. Transform results of each study into common statistic so that tey can be compared 3. Examine average effect size across studies
49
advantages/disadvantages of meta analysis
Advantages: - Provides more power to find out significant effects Disadvantages: - Problems with methodology - File drawer effect: Studies that do not support the hypothesis they are designed to test are less likely to get published