Chapter 4 - Research Design & Methods Flashcards
What are Observations?
- Observations, as a social research data collection method, involve direct observation of phenomena, or observations of individuals or groups of individuals interacting in a natural setting.
- It is a systematic way of collecting data of real-time actions / behaviour displayed by individuals with the goal of recording what is seen.
What are the guidelines when conducting Observations?
- Carry out observation in natural settings where attitudes and behaviours can be best understood. Researchers often go to the scene of the action to observe participants directly.
- Observers need to take lengthy and descriptive notes of the behaviour of the individuals being observed. The researchers must be trained to record the behaviour of these individuals as specifically as possible. Alternatively, observations can be recorded for further analysis.
- Observations can yield a deeper understanding of the social phenomena provided the researcher observes in a deliberate, well-planned, and active way. Therefore, the researcher must plan for the observation. Depending on the nature of the study, the researcher may need to prepare a pre-coded observation checklist to guide the observations and to record what needs to be observed.
- Observations typically yield qualitative data. Therefore, there is room for subjective interpretation of what is happening. The recording of the observations should be accurate, thorough, complete, and should include only what is being observed.
What is covert research?
In a Covert research, the researcher may or may not participate. The individuals are not aware that they are being observed.
What are the Advantages of covert research?
- When covert observation is used, individuals do not know that they are being observed, and will behave naturally.
- The researcher can observe the flow of behaviour of individuals in their natural setting
- Provides a more valid view of the group being studied
- Allows the researcher to expand knowledge on lesser-known social groups
What are the Challenges of covert research?
- Raises serious ethical concerns such as deceiving the individuals being observed
- Lack of informed consent
- As a covert observer, the researchers might miss out on important observations as they are participating the process
- Researchers may inadvertently affect the social processes they are studying if they are acting as observer-participants
What is Overt research?
The participants know that they are being observed.
What are the Advantages of overt research?
- Allows the researcher to be honest with the participants, thus avoiding problematic ethical issues such as deception or lack of informed consent.
- Prevents researcher from becoming over-familiar with the participants. It keeps the observation objective and free from bias.
- As a complete observer, the researcher will be less likely to inadvertently affect the social processes they are studying
What are the Challenges of overt research?
- When participants know they are being observed, they may modify their behaviour. This is known as ‘reactivity’.
- Participants may act in a way which they believe is expected by the observer. This is known as the ‘observer effect’. Participants may be even more prone to the observer effect when they understand the aims of the observer.
What are the Tools to facilitate the recording of observations?
- Observation Notes where events and behaviours are recorded Observation notes can take the form of notebooks
- Pre-coded Observation sheets with pre-determined observational categories
- Video-recorders or audio-recorders to record observations for further analysis. Where possible, obtain consent from participants to video or audio-record observations.
What are the General Ethical Issues of conducting observations?
The role of observer is to observe, not to interfere with the participants’ usual behaviour. However, researchers are ethically obliged to protect participants from harm. This may create an ethical dilemma for the researcher. For example: if a researcher studying school bullying observes a school bully beating up another student, should the observer intervene in the situation to prevent more harm?
What are Focus Group Discussions?
- A qualitative focus group discussion involves a group of individuals who have some common interest or characteristics. The group is brought together by a moderator, who uses the group and its interaction to gain information about a specific or focused issue.
- The recommended size of the sample group is typically 6 - 10 people who are unfamiliar with each other.
- The moderator’s role is to ensure that all participants are given the opportunity to express their feelings, perceptions and opinions.
- Depending on the issue being studied, and the range of views required, the researcher may want to conduct several focus group discussions in order to collect comprehensive information about the topic being studied.
What are the advantages of Focus Group Discussions?
- Focus groups are less time and resource intensive than conducting multiple one-to-one interviews, as researchers are collecting information from several participants simultaneously.
- Focus groups enable researchers to understand how groups of individuals react to issues or shared experiences.
- Participants may be more open and willing to share their experiences when they are with similar individuals.
What are the disadvantages of Focus Group Discussions?
- Participants in focus groups should have something in common that is central to the research study. Focus groups are not ideal when participants are too dissimilar, or when participants have widely differing viewpoints or experiences.
- Focus group participants are less likely to be selected through rigorous, probability sampling methods. As such, participants may not be representative of the population that is being studied.
- The success of the interview depends on the skill and experience of the facilitator. Facilitators need to be able to maintain good dynamics among the members during the interview. One participant may dominate the interview and this can reduce the likelihood of others participating in the interview. It may lead to ‘groupthink’, which refers to the tendency of other people in a group to agree with the opinions and decisions of the most outspoken members of the group. Hence, the facilitator needs to manage the focus group and ensure that all members of the group are given enough time to share their views.
- Interviewer bias may set in if interviewers cannot resist bringing their own views into the discussion by over-directing the interview and the interviewees.
What are Interviews?
- An interview is a conversation or a social interaction between the interviewer and the respondent(s).
- There are three types of interviews: structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, and unstructured interviews.
What are Structured Interviews?
Structured interviews are usually based on standardised questionnaires, and produce mainly quantitative research.
What are Structured Interviews?
Semi-structured interviews are based on interview guides, which outline key questions that define the areas that the researcher wants to explore. The interviewer can follow up with prompts to obtain more in-depth responses from participants where necessary. The interviewer usually follows the order of questions in the interview guide.
What are Structured Interviews?
Unstructured interviews are more flexible and less structured than semi-structured interviews.
What are the characteristics of Structured Interviews?
- To provide mainly quantitative data for analysis
- Standardised questionnaires are used to interview an individual or a group.
- The number of questions is pre- determined and the order of the questions is fixed
What are the characteristics of Unstructured Interviews?
- The purpose is to provide more in-depth data
- Interviewer asks the questions and allows the respondents to respond freely
- Typically, fewer questions are asked. The purpose of the questions is to guide the interviewer to facilitate the interview. The interviewer may prompt the participants and/or ask them to elaborate on their responses. The order of the questions may not be fixed.
What is Sampling in Research?
A process of selecting a sample to represent the population.
What is the Population in Sampling in Research?
It is the entire group targeted for the research, from which the researcher wishes to describe or draw conclusions about.
What is the Sample in Sampling in Research?
It is the sub-set of the target population from which the researcher hopes to draw valid conclusions about the target population after the research.
What is the Sample Size in Sampling in Research?
The total number of participants in the research study.
* The sample size should be sufficient (large enough) such that the researcher can make meaningful conclusions about the target population being studied. * Ideally, the sample size should be large enough for researchers to be reasonably confident that the sample represents the population. * Often not possible, especially in social service research. * The bigger the sample size, the better is the representation of the population.
What are the 2 approaches to Sampling Methods?
- Probability
* Non-probability