Chapter 5: Civil Justice System (CJS) Flashcards
(41 cards)
What is the civil justice system (CJS)?
The CJS is designed to resolve civil legal disputes between individuals and/or organisations
What is the purpose for bringing a case under the civil justice system?
One party sues the other usually for money, or some remedy in equity
What are the 5 areas of civil law that the CJS governs?
- Contract law
- Family law
- Tort law
- Property law
- Judicial review
What is the outcome/remedy after proceedings in a CJS?
Varies & complicated
What are the possible parties that may be invovled in a CJS claim?
- Varying individuals
- Groups
- Public bodies
- Corporations
Everyone basically
What is the nature of the CJS?
It is more complex than criminal justice system
- Involves more variety of disputes and expectations of the parties from civil courts
What is the Woolf Report, what incorporated the aims in the report??
What was the aim of this report?
Civil Procedure Rules came into force in April 1999, incorporating the Woolf Report which aims were to
- Reduce cost, delay and complexity, and to increase access to justice
What are the 2 courts that are part of the Civil Justice System?
What is there to note about each?
What is another court that hears civil cases sometimes?
High court (3 divisions)
- Family Division - marriage, children and the family (divorce, adoption, will)
- Chancery - finance and property (tax, bankruptcy)
- Queen’s Bench - most varied jurisdiction (contract & tort)
County Court
- Currently around 300 county courts exclusively for civil work
Magistrates Court
- Although most civil cases are governed by High Court & County Court, Magistrates Court has limited civil jurisdiction
What are the 3 roles carried out by the CJS?
3 functions
Dispute resolutions
- Resolves disputes between parties (including adjudication of claims)
Determination
- Provides authoritative determination of matters
Rule-making
- Formulated rules & principles for people to refer to the law
What are the 5 objectives/aims of the CJS?
1) Just
- Unbiased and serious decision making and provides the right to review or challenge the decisions
2) Accessible
- Should not be expensive
- Process and procedures should be user-friendly enough to understand
3) Efficient
- Procedure should not be cumbersome (hard to handle) and repetitive
4) Prompt/quick
- Quick in resolving disputes, no technical objections to delay proceedings
- To encourage parties to cooperate, to resolve their disputes
5) Effective
- Machineries of justice allowed to ensure compliance
- Certainty in the law
- There shouldn’t be a need to resort to other difficulties (another forum) to resolve their disputes
What were the old values/legal prciniples that were adopted for legal education for lawyers given by the CJS?
Pre-Woolf Reforms
- The ratio decidendi and obiter of the case
- Legal principles established in the case
- Legal rights established in the case
- Possible counter arguments to negate legal rights to distinguish the legal case
What were the 5 problems/issues with the CJS?
Pre-Woolf Reforms
1) Expensive
- Arising from the concept of ‘just’ proceedings - allowing free control of proceedings
- Allowing counsel to take any legal technical points to advance the client’s case
- This makes it slow, expensive, and complex
2) Delays
- The Civil Justice Review found that trial takes up to 3 years for county court, and 5 years for High Court
- Another problem - sometimes both lawyers will disregard time limits to create an opportunity to negotiate
3) Injustice
- Usually an out-of-court settlement is negotiated before litigants even reach the trial stage (excluding family and civil cases at Magistrates). Only 4% of cases filed go for trial; and these settlements are advantageous to provide quick disputes and reduce costs
- But leads to injustice -
1. The party that is strictly was entitled to the full sum, if brought to trial might significantly reduce the compensation
2. Party that is not liable to pay under law, may have to pay something else to claimant (to negotiate to not go through trial)
3. The settlement negotiated is a form of compromise and not actual law being at play
4) The Adversarial Process
- Encourages a tactical manoeuvre by the parties, rather than cooperation
- Would be way simpler and cheaper for each side to state what it alleged in the pleadings (for easy dispute)
5) Too much emphasis on Oral Evidence
- In the 20th century much of the information the judge needed could be provided on paper rather than to read it before trial
- This makes it slow, added cost and further delays
What was the general reform that was implemented by the Woolf Reforms?
introduction
Goal was to fundamentally change the litigation culture - which one of the first rules of the new Civil Procedure Rules are to enable court to deal with cases ‘justly’
- This objective/principle would prevail over all other rules in case of conflic
What are the 5 points of Rules 1.1(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules that incorporated the Woolf Reforms?
Main reforms
**“Dealing with a case justly includes, as far as is practicable -
- ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing;
- saving expense;
- dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate -
* to the amount of money involved;
* to the importance of the case;
* to the complexity of the issues; and
* to the financial position of each party;
4) ensuring that it is dealt with expeditiously and fairly; and
5) allotting to it an appropriate share of the Court’s resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases.”
What were the 2 desired outcome of the Woolf Reforms?
1) To avoid litigation through pre-trial settlements - litigation is viewed to be the last resort
2) The aim and objective of the civil justice process is to still attain cases that are “Justly”
- However, now definition of ‘just’ is now on (a) efficiency and (b) timeliness (to increase efficiency & timeliness)
- Which would result in (c) lowering costs
- Which would result in (d) increasing access to the CJS
What were the 5 reforms that was brought by the Woolf Reforms?
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Pre-Action Protocols
- Unify rules of courts
- Case allocation
- Judges as case managers
What is an Alternative Dispute Resolution?
Woof reform
What is it?
- Legal aid for out of court resolutions
Why
- Courts should be the last resort
- More cost effective
- Time efficient
Methods
- Arbitration
- Mediation
- Conciliation
What are pre-action protocols?
What are the 4 innovations to this?
Woolf reforms
Introduction
- Pretrial procedures is the most key area of civil process, since few cases actually go to trial
1) Encourage cooperation between litigants
* More pre-action contact between parties
2) Documents disclosed and exchanged at early stage
* Earlier and fuller exchange of information
3) Principle of ‘all cards on table’
* Improved investigation before proceedings
4) Pre-action settlement
* A settlement before proceedings have commenced
What are the 3 unified rules of the courts?
Woolf reforms
- High court and County Court
- Plain English instead of Latin
- Reduce complexities
What is case allocation?
What are the 3 types of case allocation?
case allocation - allocating to value and complexity
1) Small claims
- Max £10,000
- No strict rules of evidence
- Minimum £1,000
2) Fast track
- £10,000 - £25,000
- Simplified procedures
- Expert evidence on paper
3) Multi track
- > £25,000
- Active case management by judges
What is meant by ‘judges as case managers’?
IMPORTNAT
Woolf reforms
Most significant innovation to the 1999 reforms - case management means the courts will be the active manager of litigation
The Civil Procedure Rules firmly places the management case in the hands of judges
- With Rules 1.4 emphasising that court’s duty is to take a proactive role to manage cases
What are the 3 changes/reforms that were made for ‘judges as case managers’
Woolf Reforms
1) Judges involved from pre-trial to monitor/encourage efficiency of the trial
* In the trial, they are able to advice the parties to negotiate on matters
2) Monitor progress of case
* Using technology to monitor
3) Impose timetable
* Create deadlines
* Penalties for parties purposely delaying
What is the actual procedure of judges being case managers?
Woolf Reforms
Procedure
- Once proceedings have started, court’s power will be triggered to filing a defence
- When the defence has filed, trial dates will be fixed and will be difficult to postpone
- Courts will first need to allocate the case to 1 of 3 tracks - which will determine the future contract of the proceedings
- At various stage in the dispute, the court will actively promote settlement by Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Note for precedure (3) - 3 tracks
1. Small claims track
2. Fast-tract
3. Multi-track
How to determine the appropriate track
1. Determine whether a case should be subject to summary judgement, or
2. Whether a stay of proceedings should be given for alternative dispute resolution; and
3. If neither applies, should allocate hearing or whether the matter can be the subject of paper determination of the allocation to a particular track
What is the nature of principles for civil justice?
What are the 3 principles of civil justice?
Principles are based on natural justice, which structure the civil justice, and all process of civil justice should uphold these values
3 principles
- Intergrity
- Participation
- Open Justice