Part 4 - History & Constitutional Background Flashcards
(35 cards)
What are 2 types of legal systems?
- Common law system
- Civil law system
What is the nature and development of the common law system?
Nature
- Largely uncodified - historically based on cases before the courts were made
- UK courts don’t consider hypothetical cases and don’t speculate on what the law should be in an abstract manner
- Develops slowly - case to case
Development
- England’s influence in the development in the law is by traditional legal practitioners
What is the nature and development of the civil law system?
What is the major influence of French legal system?
Nature
- Constructed more theoretically - uses codes that set out a complete legal principles that are universally applied to any case (in theory)
Development
- French development of the law is largely by legal scholars and teachers who taught laws more rationally and scientifically
- Which led to abstract legal principles
Influence - France
- French law has been largely influenced by Roman law (corpus juris civilis)
- Legal code instilled by Roman Emperor Justinian in 6th Century
- Because of the French revolution in 1789, led to the creation of the Code Civil in 1804
- To eradicate the law of the past and replace it
What the context of the development of UK common law?
very beggining
(1)
Context
- Development of English common law started since William the Conqueror invaded England in 1066
- Before the William Conquest there was no unitary national legal system
- Started with oral customary rules
- Each county/shire had their own local court that had its own customs that varied between communities
- Justice was enforced in an arbitrary fashion by local lords or landowners
- Courts were completely different at this time
What was the beggining of the development of the common law?
(2)
Focus
- William laid down the foundations of the legal system
- He knew that a central system of justice was required to exercise real power, where the King had control and laws were obeyed
Curia Regis
- Doing so he created the Curia Regis - King’s Court
- A court house and a royal household consisting of the King and his advisers (landowners and clergymen)
- King’s court travelled around the country citizens would bring grievances to him to get advice for their grievances
Who played the most pivotal role in the development of the UK common law?
(3)
Introduction
- Probably the most contributing factor was King Henry II in 1154 after a long period of disruption and civil war
Focus
- He wanted to reform land law and deal with rampant crime
- He focused on creating a single system of justice for the whole country
- At this point there were only 18 judges
- In 1166 he ordered 5 to remain in Westminster, London to deal with cases that were previously decided
- Remaining judges sent to travel to different parts of the country (‘travelling justices’)
- To decide grievances, complaints and accusations applying precedent from Westminster
Outcome
- This was how local laws were replaced by new national laws (start of common law)
Development
* Slowly decisions were written down
* This practice developed into following precedents cited in arguments before the courts which were regarded as ‘authority’ of pre-existing legal principles
How had social order developed in common law?
Beggining
- Laws at this point were to prevent bloodshed by recognised rights to property and personal freedom
- This era ended after the establishment of the King’s Court in the 12th Century
Development
- They began to create disputes over land and other property
- Courts offered service to public
- Instead of solving disputes by violence, judge would rule on rights and wrongs and offer remedies
- This resolution of disputes supported social order and tranquility of the state
What is the meaning of equity in the common law system sense?
Legal rules that were developed by the courts to overcome some of the inflexibility of the rules and procedures of common law courts
What was the development of Equity in the UK?
- By 15th Century procedures of common law became slow, expensive and technical, with lack of satisfactory remedies
- Citizens petitioned the King to ‘redress their grievances’, meaning to lead directly to him to hera their complaints and give remedies
- King did so but slowly cases were too much
- He then passed them to his senior legal adviser, the Chancellor (a cleric) as the ‘Keeper of the King’s Conscience’
- Eventually the special court, Court of Chancery was created to deal with petitions on the basis of what was morally right
How was equity carried out (function)?
- Chancellor would give judgement not according to precedent, but through his discretion of what was right and wrong by merits of a particular case
- In 1474 the Chancellor issued his first decree which began the independence of the Court of Chancery from the King’s Council which was how equity was created
What were the 2 changes that equity contributed?
1) Equity created new rights
- Recognising trust (holding a legal title on behalf of another - ‘beneficiary’)
- Giving beneficiaries rights against trustees (common law didn’t recognise this device regarding trustees as owners)
2) New remedies
- If Chancellor convinced a person suffered a wrong the court would grant a remedy (not available in common law courts)
- Ensure that something was done to put right the wrong that had been done to the person
3) More flexible remedies
- Specific performances - giving an order to a person to stop a particular act
After awhile, what was the problem that equity faced?
What was the solution to the problem?
Problem
- Later on, the Court of chancery became expensive and took a long time for cases to be heard
- By 19th Century, the court was subject to criticisms
Judicature Act 1873-75
- 1873, common law courts and equity combined in the Judicature Act 1973-75
- Before this, equity and common law coexisted uneasily in a parallel situation until Earl of Oxford’s Case (1615) where it was held that equity prevailed over common law in times of conflict
* Now al courts deal with common law and equity principles and remedies
* However high court is still called Chancery Division
What is the Act that provides a constitutional principle?
What was the effect of the Act?
Section 1 Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- a) the existing constitutional principle of the rule of law, or
- b) the Lord Chancellor’s existing constitutional role in relation to that principle
Effect
- Effect of CRA 2005
The Act altered the role of the LC and created the new UKSC (as a response to concerns that the previous arrangements contravened the SOP)
What is a written constitution?
What are examples of countries that adopt this?
Rules for governance of the country are laid down in a single document and are specifically protected so that changes to those rules are virtually impossible to make
Countries
- USA, Germany, India, South Africa, Malaysia
What is an unwritten constitution?
What are examples of countries that adopt this?
Introduction
- No single document that explains powers divided and exercised
- Constitutional rules & principles come from written and unwritten materials
- HRA 1998 is not written a written constitution but a set of written rules (a type of ‘constitutional statute’)
Example
- UK, New Zealand, Israe
What are the sources of rules/laws from an unwrriten constitution?
Statute, common law, customs, constitutional conventions
What is an advantage and disadvantage of an unwritten constitution?
Advantage
- Flexible compared to written constitutions - can adapt when necessary, but the downside is that it is easier for thee state to abuse its power by passing laws to breach this
Disadvantage
- More difficult to access and understand - citizens will find it hard to access and understand the fundamental laws that govern them
What are the 3 constitutional principles of the UK?
Parliamentary sovereignty
Separation of powers
Rule of law
What is Parliamentary Sovereingty?
- Fundamental & most important principle of UK’s unwritten constitution
- Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the UK - can make or unmake any law
- Generally courts can’t overrule legislation
What is a positive and a negative of PS?
Positive
- Parliament can make and unmake any law - no distinctions between ‘ordinary’ and ‘constitutional law’
Negative
- validity/legality of statute cannot be challenged in court
What are 2 cases that began to challenge the concept of PS - beginning to classify ‘constitutional statutes’
Thoburn v Sunderland CC [2002]
- Laws LJ - ‘We should recognise a hierarchy of Acts of Parliament: as it were “ordinary” statutes and “constitutional” statutes’
R (HS2 action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC
- Held - Accepted the concept of constitutional concepts in Thoburn
What are the 3 bodies of power under SOP?
- Legislature - makes new laws
- Executive - implementing laws and running the country
- Judiciary - determining legal disputes and interpreting legislation passed by legislature
What is Separation of Power?
The 3 branches of the state gives the idea that division of power prevents accumulation of too much power in the hands of one organ and provides ‘checks and balances’
What academic provides his view on SOP?
Montesquieu in 1748 – The Spirit of Laws
- When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty…there is no liberty if the power of judging is not separated from the legislative and executive…there would be an end to everything, if the same man or the same body…were to exercise those three powers.