Chapter 6 Criminal Law P3 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the steps of criminal prosecution?

A

1) Arrest
2) Booking
3) Preliminary Hearing
4) Indictment/Information
5) Arraignment
6) Trial
7) Verdict
8) Appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe 1st (arrest) stage.

A
  • taken into custody
  • miranda rights read
  • warrant may be necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What major cases for ARREST

A

Miranda v Arizona - miranda rights (5th), can’t use testimony while in custody without notifying them

US v Leon - exclusionary rule (can’t be used if obtained without warrant), good faith exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2nd stage of criminal prosecution - booking

A
  • Information about events expressed in written form in an official report
  • mugshot
  • personal property and clothing taken into possession
  • Fingerprinting process
  • Full body search
  • Checking for warrants
  • Health screening
  • Eliciting information relevant to incarceration conditions-trying to get information about affiliations with other people/organized crime
  • dna sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3rd stage - Preliminary Hearing

A

Courts look to see if there is PROBABLE CAUSE that the defendant committed the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is probable cause determined? (preliminary hearing)

A
  • Evidence found in booking
  • evidence stripped during search
  • Spoken
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4th stage - Indictment / Information

A

Indictment
- only SERIOUS FELONIES
- prosecution presents to GRAND JURY

Information
- formal accusation of a misdemeanor by prosecutors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a grand jury & purpose?

A

16-23 people, NOT OPEN to PUBLIC
- Defendants do NOT have right to appear before a grand jury
- prosecutor speaks, defendant attorney there but don’t speak

Purpose = Eliminate bias, profiling, discrimination
- determine if there’s SUFFICIENT GROUNDS to press charges, GJ determines if there’s probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5th stage - Arraignment

A

Defendant INFORMED of charges and enter guilty or NOT guilty plea
- bail set (if not already)
- detained if pose threat, US v Salerno

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

6th - Trial

A

1) Jury Selection / Voir Dire *
- can challenge & remove jury if bias or for no reason
2) Opening Statements
3) Examinations - direct, cross, redirect (only own witness)
4) Closing Statements
5) Jury Instructions - provide info on law
6) Jury Deliberation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

7th - Verdict

A

Jury gives verdict AND recommendation for sentencing

Sentencing - Judge makes official

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

8th - Appeal

A

defendant can appeal verdict if there was a PREJUDICIAL ERROR
- mistakes made by the judge about the law
- incorrect instructions given to the jury
- errors or misconduct by the lawyers or by the jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Criminal defenses (9)

A

1-3) self defense, defense of others, defense of property
4) Insanity
5) Infancy
6) Intoxication
7) Duress
8) Mistake of Fact
9) Entrapment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reasonable vs deadly force

A

reasonable = in accordance to potential harm

deadly = likely to cause severe harm or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Self defense - In NY

A
  • Can use EQUAL force
  • Duty to Retreat: must try to escape first
  • Castle Doctrine: retreat in PUBLIC
  • Stand your ground: don’t have to escape first
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fl v Zimmerman

A
  • anonymous jury
17
Q

Defense of others

A
  • ## reasonable force
18
Q

Defense of property

A
  • CANNOT USE deadly force
  • if break and enter and have reason to believe in harm, switches to self-defense
19
Q

Infancy for 15-17

A

Absolutely Capable
- may be tried as adult or minor depending on previous behavior & severity of charges

20
Q

Infancy for 8-14

A

possess “Sufficient Mental Capacity”
- Can understand difference between right and wrong and the consequences
- Evaluate capacity with psychiatrist, must have conversation, assess medical records, talk to parents and teachers

21
Q

Infancy for under 8

A

UNABLE to possess “sufficient mental capacity”
- Can’t form criminal intent
- INCAPABLE of truly understanding right and wrong and the consequences
- Usually below age of 10 cant be seized and sent to juvenile facility - depends on state statutes

22
Q

McNaughton Test (Insanity)

A

lack of CAPACITY to decipher between right and wrong
- most common
- determine if complete impairment –> spectrum to see if need additional tests

23
Q

Durham’s Rule (insanity)

A

Not responsible if act was a product of mental disease
- provided full acquittal until 1954

24
Q

irresistible impulse test

A

insane or criminal impulse uncontrollable
- used after mcnaughton

25
Q

American Law Institute’s Penal Code

A

presents grounds for being TEMPORARILY INSANE
- syndromes, abuse victims

26
Q

why does the insanity defense NOT apply to sociopaths and psychopaths?

A

have criminal intent, know its wrong, understand consequences, have capacity

27
Q

Involuntary vs Voluntary Intoxication

A

Voluntary = NEVER defense
Involuntary = unaware of drugs, possible defense, need blood/drug test

28
Q

Mistake of Fact

A

when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime
- NO INTENT to commit a crime
- shot someone because didn’t know gun was loaded

29
Q

Entrapment

A
  • tricked/coerced by law enforcement to engage in criminal conduct
  • drugs
30
Q

Duress

A

threatened to commit crime
- Physical: harm body
- mental: shame, reputation
- NOT APPLICABLE to murders

31
Q

Purpose of anonymous jury

A

high profile, controversial, potentially dangerous cases
- eliminate bias