Chapter 6 - Learning Flashcards
(35 cards)
What are the three types of learning? What are the two types for each?
Nonassociative: learning about a stimulus such as a sight or sound in the external world.
2 types:
Habituation = when our behavioural response to a stimulus decreases as more stimulation occurs, because we no longer need to focus on it as much as it is not posing a danger and is taking up our limited attention. We still process it but we ignore the input.
Sensitization = when the behavioural response to a stimulation increases as we are repeatedly exposed to it — meaning we can more easily recognize it and so we more quickly respond. So this would be when it is dangerous, and so our response pathway is amplified to low us to have that larger response to live.
Associative: learning the relationship between two pieces of information — how are they associated with each other?
2 types:
Classical conditioning = when we learn that a stimulus predicts another stimulus, then our response to the second stimulus will also become our response to the other one.
Operant conditioning = when we learn that a behaviour leads to a certain outcome, then we will learn to do that behaviour or not based on the outcome.
Observational: learning by watching how others behave
2 types:
Modeling = imitating a behaviour seen by others
Vicarious learning = learning to engage in a behaviour or not after seeing others being rewarded or punished for performing that action.
What is classical conditioning? What is an example? What is the operational definition for it?
What is the unconditioned response? What about the unconditioned stimulus?
What is the conditioned response? The conditioned stimulus? What about the neutral stimulus? What is the response to a neutral stimulus?
A type of learning where a neutral stimulus acquires the capacity to evoke a response that was originally evoked by another stimulus.
An example of this would be that food produces drooling, so if you pair a bell with food, then eventually the bell will produce drooling.
The unconditioned response is the response which naturally occurs due to normal psychological pathways. For this example this would be drooling in response to food.
The unconditioned stimulus is the stimulus that requires a response without training the thing to do so (like the food).
The conditioned response is the response that was originally due to the unconditioned stimulus, but which is now paired with some other stimulus. So it is a response to an object that would not normally occurring.
The conditioned stimulus is the stimulus which did not originally produce a response but now does because it was paired with an unconditioned stimulus.
The neutral stimulus is the stimulus which originally produced no response but once paired with the unconditioned stimulus will produce the same response in the person.
When a neutral stimulus is provided, no response will occur until it is paired with an unconditioned stimulus and produces an unconditioned response.
The operational definition is a measurement of the unconditioned response. So drooling for the dog one.
Why does classical conditioning happen?
Classical conditioning happens because when you pair an unconditioned stimulus with a neutral stimulus, and they always show up together, they will be stored together in memory. So when you just produce the neutral stimulus, it will now be conditioned because it will be recognized in the same memory and trigger that neurological pathway to produce the conditioned response.
What is the process called when trying to remove this conditioning? How is this done?
This process is called extinction, and to do this each time the unconditioned stimulus appears, the conditioned stimulus is not there. Eventually, these two sources will stop being stored together in memory and it will be extinguished.
Also after an extended time, if the conditioned stimulus is presented without the unconditioned stimulus, the conditioned response will extinguish because they realize they are no longer connected.
When trying to condition someone, what will happen after a while if the CS is presented without the US?
If it hasn’t been very long, the CR will quickly decrease, but if they have been ingrained in memory for a long time, then it will take longer for the CR to extinguish.
What happens if after a 24 hour rest from conditioning and then extinction, the CS is presented alone once again? What about another 24 hours later?
The brain will revert back to its stored neurological pathways and have a SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY, responding weakly to the CS with a CR. It will then extinguish again.
The another 24 hours later there will be another weaker spontaneous recovery, because the CS has been presented along for so long. The longer it has been ingrained in your memory, the more breaks that will be required to make it go extinct.
What is generalization and what is discrimination?
Generalization: this is a learning relationship where one conditioned response is generalized to other similar stimuli, meaning that response will be produced even when the conditioned stimuli is not the one producing anything. So they have to sound similar to do this.
Discrimination:
This is when the conditioned stimulus is highly specified, and the learner is not going to react with their conditioned response to any similar stimulus.
How to do discrimination training?
To do discrimination training, pair a certain frequency of stimulus with the unconditioned stimulus repetitively, and then introduce a different frequency but similar stimulus WITHOUT the unconditioned stimulus repeatedly, and so they will learn to only respond to the specific frequency stimulus.
For a graph of frequency in tone of the conditioned stimulus vs the strength of the conditioned response, what will the generalization trained graph look like, and what will the discrimination trained graph look like?
For this graph, the closer you get to the conditioned stimulus frequency, the larger the conditioned response will be for both.
HOWEVER, for the generalization plot, it will be a wide shorter curve, because there is a larger deviation from the exact conditioned stimulus. Frequencies close to that conditioned stimulus will still induce a response.
For the discrimination plot, it will have a very low response rate until very close to the conditioned stimulus, because the person has been trained to not react unless it is the specific frequency. And any small deviations might just be because they cannot notice a difference between the specific frequency and the ones close to it. So discrimination training ensures there is almost no response to the different frequencies.
What is second order conditioning? What is an example of this?
Second order conditioning still follows the classical conditioning pattern. However, now the conditioned stimulus has been trained to produce another conditioned response. Meaning the US produces a UR, and is US and CS1 are paired, this produces a CR1, which will occur when CS1 is shown on its own. Then, if you pair another item with the now conditioned CS1, you will get a newly conditioned response to that second item (which is the same response as UR and CR1), and can be called CR2. Eventually after enough time CS2 will produce a CR2 on its own.
An example of this would be a nurse giving a shot. At first, since a needle produces pain (US) and pain produces crying (UR), the needle is the conditioned response because is always paired with pain. So just seeing the needle creates crying. But the more often that the person gets the shot, the more they will realize that the nurse means there’s a needle coming which means there is pain. Therefore the nurse will become the the secondary conditioned response, which will produce a reaction before the shot is even shown.
So here:
US: Pain
UR: Crying
CS1: needle
CR1: crying
CS2: nurse
CR2: crying
If there is a rat in a chamber, and you place a harmless blue bar in the chamber, the rat hides. Then you put a red light with the blue bar, and eventually the rat will hide due to the red light on its own. What type of conditioning is this, and what are the various parts? (CS, CR, US, etc.)
In this case, the blue bar is harmless, and so the rat’s fear of it is irrational. Therefore, this is not an unconditioned response, unconditioned is natural and based on your autonomic nervous system.
Therefore, this bar is already the first conditioned stimulus, which was originally conditioned with something else we do not know.
Then the red light is the second conditioned stimulus, as it was paired with CS1 to produce the same CR.
So:
US = ?
UR = hide
CS1 = blue bar
CR1 = hide
CS2 = red light
CR2 = hide
So the responses will always all be the same.
What is the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike?
The law of effect says that:
Any behaviour that leads to a “satisfying state of affairs — very ambiguous — is likely to occur again, and any behaviour that leads to an “annoying state of affairs” is less likely to occur again.
Or in other words:
The likelihood of the occurrence of a behaviour is influenced by its consequences.
What is Thorndike’s puzzle box? What did it indicate?
This puzzle box had a window to a bowl of food that the cat could see. There was then a lever attached to a string which opens the door of the box.
When first placed in there, it will take a lot of time for the cate to get out, because they don’t know how. Only once they accidentally step on the lever will the door open.
So the second time they are put in the box they will realize that this lever opens the door, and therefore this is a pattern that their brain recognizes. It’s conditioned learning, the cat wants the food, and the lever gets them to the food. So the UR is getting to the food, and the lever is the CR1 so they realize this will open the door which will give them food.
So over time, the escape time drastically lowers. However, if they take a break and come back they will forget, but as soon as they escape and try again the response time will lower faster then the first time, since they will remember quicker.
What did B.F. skinner do as an experiment to elaborate on thorndike’s law? What theory did he develop?
B.F. Skinner invented the operant chamber, which was just a more complicated version of the puzzle box from before. It had a lever, signal lights, a speaker, a shock generator and an electric grid that the animal sits on, and a pellet dispenser that goes into the box.
So over time, the rat would learn that the lever disperses the pellets, but maybe something else creates a loud noise that they don’t want, and another button produces a shock which they don’t like, and based on the consequences they will either continue with that response or not.
He developed the theory of operant conditioning which was based off of Thorndike’s ideas.
What is the difference between classical and operant conditioning?
Classical conditioning: A type of learning where a neutral stimulus acquires the ability to evoke an originally UR (involuntary or reflexive), which was originally NATURALLY evoked by another stimulus.
Operant conditioning: A form of learning where voluntary responses come to be controlled by their consequences. So this was based on thorndike’s belief that the likelihood of the occurrence of a behaviour is influenced by its consequences, but this theory was created by skinner.
What are the two main categories of response to an action and consequence?
You either will do that action again due to a good consequence, or will not do it again due to a bad consequence.
What are the 4 subcategories (2 in each) within these responses? (Think about what the action is and the corresponding response)
Positive reinforcement:
GET SOMETHING GOOD, WILL DO THIS AGAIN.
Negative reinforcement:
SOMETHING BAD IS REMOVED, WILL DO THIS AGAIN.
Positive punishment:
GET SOMETHING BAD, WILL NOT DO THIS AGAIN.
Negative punishment:
SOMETHING GOOD IS REMOVED, WILL NOT DO THIS AGAIN.
What does the word POSITIVE indicate for learning? What about punishment? NEGATIVE? Reinforcement? How to remember these 4 subcategories of consequence and response?
POSITIVE = you GET something due to your action.
NEGATIVE = something gets TAKEN AWAY due to your action.
REINFORCEMENT = You WILL do that action again, because the consequences reinforced your decision and the subsequent action that occurred.
PUNISHMENT = you WILL NOT do that action again, because you were punished and so your decision was NOT reinforced.
To remember these 4 categories, just know if YOU GET SOMETHING = POSITIVE. If SOMETHING IS TAKEN AWAY = NEGATIVE.
If the consequence is GOOD = REINFORCEMENT (the consequence reinforces your action and will cause you to do it again).
If the consequence is BAD = PUNISHMENT (the consequence harmed you and hence will cause you to not do that again).
Punishment will always _________ ones behaviour, because the consequence was _______.
Reinforcement will always ________ ones behaviour, because the consequence was _________.
Punishment will always DECREASE one’s behaviour because the consequence was BAD.
Reinforcement will always INCREASE one’s behaviour because the consequence was GOOD.
Using Skinner’s box, what would be an example of a response in each of these 4 categories?
Positive reinforcement: the animal presses the lever, food comes into the chamber. They got something good, so this reinforces their actions and causes them to act in the same way again.
Negative reinforcement: Push the lever and it turns off bright lights and loud speaker that harm the animal. Something bad was taken away, so their actions were reinforced by this good consequence and they will do it again.
Positive punishment: Pull the lever and it electrifies the grid — causes a shock. This will harm the animal and hence something bad was added, punishing them and causing them to not do it again.
Negative punishment: food is continuously coming in, until you pull the lever then it stops. Something good was taken away so you don’t want to do that again and your behaviour in that manner decreases.
In a disciplinary procedure — disciplining kids, do you use positive or negative punishment?
PP = add something bad
NP = take away something good
Positive punishment would be like corporal punishment, which is harming the child with physical abuse. This is illegal.
But a mild form of physical punishment is not effective because its consequence will not overtake the joy of what the person is violating.
So in this case negative punishment (take away valuable privileges) will be the best.
What are the three things to consider in effectively using punishment (acronym)?
Timing — apply immediately after behaviour so brain associates action with that punishment (similar to classical conditioning).
Intensity — intensity of punishment should match or surpass the intensity of the misbehaviour.
Consistency — have to do it every time there is a misbehaviour, or there will be a weak association between the punishment and the misbehaviour.
Acronym:
TIC