Chapter 6: Resisting Persuasive Messages Flashcards

1
Q

attitude innoculation

A

the process of making people IMMUNE to attempts to change their attitudes by exposing them to small doses of the arguments AGAINST their position.

Like when you protect someone from getting a disease by giving them bits of the disease in small doses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can attitude innoculation be effective in resisting attacks on our attitudes.

A

those who had formulated arguments FOR THEIR OPINION were less likely to be persuaded by messages attacking the value of their opinion.

if people are able to resist an attack on their attitudes, they may actually come to hold those attitudes with greater certainty as a result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a way that advertisers can counteract the tendency for people to “tune out” ads

A

product placement in the show they’re watching. people do not realize that someone is trying ti influence their attitudes and behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

a feeling of discomfort caused by the realization that one’s behavior is inconsistent with one’s attitudes or that one holds two conflicting attitudes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

most common method of mitigating dissonance and condition in which this is implemented

A

changing out attitudes to bring them in line with our behavior.

this only works if our attitude towards something isn’t that strong. if a topic is really importnat, we are less liekly to reduce dissonance by changing that attitude. we may change our behavior instead to bring it inline with the dissonant cognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

methods of reducing dissonance

A

1) change behavior
2) change cognitions
3) add consonant cognitions (exemptions to the rules)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

post decision dissonance? how do you reduce it?

A

dissonance that is inevitably aroused after a person makes a decision, such dissonance is typically reduced by ENHANCING the attractiveness of the CHOSEN alternative and DEVALUING the REJECTED alternatives, even if they ranked the two equally prior to a decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the ____ and less __ the decision, the greater the need to reduce dissonance.

A

the MORE PERMANENT and less REVOKABLE the decision, the greater the need to reduce dissonance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

in terms of dissonance and immorality:

people who had cheated become more ____ towards cheating, and those who had resisted the temtation to cheat become more ____ toward cheating.

A

people who had cheated become more LENIENT towards cheating, and those who had resisted the temPtation to cheat become more HARSH/AGAINST toward cheating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the areas of the brain that are active during dissonance inblude the ____, ___ cortex.

A

STRIATUM, AND PREFRONTAL CORTEX. (site involved in planning and decision making)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what type of brain activity do you see when you present someone with dissonant info? What if consonance?

A

researchers found that the reasoning areas of the brain virtually shut down when people were confronted with dissonant info.

the emotion circuits of the brain lit up happily when consonance was restored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

justification of effort

A

the tendency for individuals to increase their liking for something they have worked hard to attain in order to not feel foolish. (method of reducing dissonance by chainging their attitude –> you like something more than before)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

external justification

A

a person’s reason or explanation for dissonant behavior that resides outside the individual (ex/ to receive a large reward or avoid a severe punishment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

internal justification

A

the reduction of dissonance by changing something about oneself (ex/ ones attitude or behavior)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

counter-attitudinal advocacy

A

the process that occurs when a person states an opinion or attitude that runs counter to his or her private belief or attitude, OFTEN RESULTING IN BELIEVING THE LIE WE TOLD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

studies show that people who have an abundance of external justification for lying told the lie but:

whereas, those who told the lie without external justification without external justification experiences ___ ____ advocacy and convinced themselves that they were being truthful.

A

studies show that people who have an abundance of external justification for lying told the lie but DIDN’T BELIEVE IT

whereas, those who told the lie without external justification without external justification experiences COUNTER ATTITUDINAL advocacy and convinced themselves that they were being truthful.

17
Q

counter attitudinal advocacy can tackle social problems by the implementation of ___ ____

A

hypocrisy induction: aversive racist students were told to write essays about why it was important to treat minority students fairly. then they had to write an essay about times that they were prejudice. this gave them time to reflect on their actions and created feelings of hypocrisy. subsequently, this group showed evidence of a reduction in prejudice and even reccommended smaller budget cuts be made to the asian student association of their school.

18
Q

insufficient punishment

A

the dissonance aroused when individuals lack sufficient external justification for having resisted a desired activity or object, usually resulting in individuals devaluing the forbidden activity.

ex/ only mildy punishing a bully rather than handing out a harsh sentence. then, when the bully stops beating up the kid, dissonance is created “i like beating up kids, but I’m not doing it.. why?” –> “ i guess I stopped because it’s really not that much fun after all.” (the punishment was too mild to produce a superabundance of justification like “i’m not beating kids up or else I’ll get kicked out of school”)

19
Q

Why is insufficient punishment and the formation of dissonance a promising method to curb bullying?

A

if you were to give harsh punishments, making bullys think “ i can’t beat up kids or else I’ll get kicked out of school/punished ,” the behavior may not decrease when the authoritative figure is not arround. TRUE ATTITUDE CHANGE HASN’T TAKEN PLACE.

if you mildly punish a bully and make them experience dissonance as to why they aren’t beating up kids, they’ll undergo a true ATTITUDE CHANGE to explain why they no longer beat kids up “ex/ I don’t find it fun anymore,” and they’ll stop doing it regardless of who is watching them.

20
Q

according to the dissonance theory, when we hurt someone:

A

we don’t apologize and try to make up for our transgression. Instead, we come to dislike or hate that person as a way of justifying our cruelty.

this is seen in genocides and why “normal citizens” may have not done anything to stick up for the jewish people during the holocaust.

21
Q

rationalization trap

A

the potential for dissonance REDUCTION to produce a succession of self-justifications that ultimately result in a chain of stupid or immoral actions.

22
Q

HOW CAN PEOPLE BE PERSUADED NOT TO RATIONALIZE THEIR BEHAVIOR WHEN THEY MAKE MISTAKES?

A

according to the SELF AFFIRMATION THEORY, people can reduce the impact of a dissonance arousing threat to their self-concept by focusing on and AFFIRMING THEIR CONFIDENCE on some dimension UNRELATED to the threat.

ex/ you are badmouthing a coworker. instead of rationalizing your bad behavior, you remind youself you did well on a physics exam. so instead of engaging in a typical dissonance-reducing behavior, she says “i just did a cruel thing, but I am also capable of being intelligent’ rather than saying “i just did a cruel thing, but the other person deserved it.”

23
Q

example of using self affirmation theory to prevent people from rationalization trapping

A

ex/ getting people to take a personality test and then ranking them as high or low self esteem, then seeing if theyd cheat on a test.

people with high self esteem won’t cheat as much. in short, a temporary self esteem boost served to inoculate these students against cheating, because the anticipation of doing something immoral was more dissonant than it would otherwise have been.

24
Q

____ people in some way (ex/ boosting their self esteem) or reminding them of their morals may reverse rationalization traps

A

AFFIRMING PEOPLE

25
Q

westerners tend to justify their behaviors and decisions when they made the choices for ____, whereas Asians tended to justify their decisions when they made choices for _____

A

westerners tend to justify their behaviors and decisions when they made the choices for THEMSELVES, whereas Asians tended to justify their decisions when they made choices for OTHERS.

26
Q

what type of self affirmation is needed to reduce dissonance reduction among canadians? asians?

A

independent self-affirmation diminished the need for dissonance reduction among Canadians, and an interdependent self affirmation diminished the need for dissonance reduction among asians.