Chapter 8 - Companies: ownership and management Flashcards
(69 cards)
What are the different types of directors? Describe each (7)
Director - Officialy appointed (on incorporation or subsequently) either by existing directors or by ordinary resolution.
De facto director (director in fact) - Anyone who acts as a director, although not validly appointed as one (they have the same powers as a properly appointed director)
Shadow director - Anyone who influences a company’s activities without being formally appointed to the board of directors - someone “in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors are accustomed to act”
Alternate director - a person who temporarily replaces a company director at board meetings
Executive director - director who is also charged with performing a specific role, eg, a finance director, usually as an employee of the company. If an executive director ceases to be a director, their office will also terminate.
Non-executive director - a director who does not have a particular function but generally just attends board meetings.
Managing Director - Charged with carrying out day-to-day management functions.
What are the requirements for becoming the director of a company?
- A director should be aged sixteen or more.
- Must not be disqualified from acting, either by the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 or by the articles of association.
How many directors are required in a company?
Every company is required to have at least one director who is a natural person (i.e. not another company) and a public company must have at least two directors
Are a directors actions valid if their appointment is found to be subsequently defective or void?
A director’s actions are valid even if his appointment is subsequently found to have been defective or void
What are the ways a director can be removed from office? (8)
- Death of the director
- Winding up of the company
- Removal by the company
- Disqualification
- Resignation
- Where required to do by articles
- Prohibition by law
- As a result of bankruptcy or a written medical opinion of being physically or mentally unable to act as a director
Upon change of director, what main administrative tasks must be undertaken?
Any change in the directors of a company should be recorded in the company’s register of directors and notified to the registrar within 14 days.
How can a company remove a director?
A company may remove a director from office by passing an ordinary resolution (< 50%) to that effect.
Special notice (of 28 days) must be given of the intended resolution and the director then has the right to address the meeting and to request that any written representations that he makes be circulated to members or read out at the meeting.
What is important to remember about the removal of a director with regards to voting rights and quoroms of meetings?
- A director who is also a member may have weighted voting rights given to him under the constitution - i.e. the articles may state that on a resolution for a director’s removal, the director to be removed has an increased per share
- A shareholders’ agreement might require a member holding each class of share must be present at a general meeting to constitute a quorum. If so, a member holding shares of a certain class could prevent a director from being removed by not attending the meeting.
What are directors main powers and what defines them?
Normally directors are authorised, in general terms, to manage the business of the company and to exercise all the powers of the company.
The powers of the directors are defined by the company’s articles and constitution
What types of authority is granted to directors? Do these types of authority bind the company through the directors actions?
What are the things that place restrictions on the powers of directors? (4)
General statutes - The directors are statutorily bound to exercise powers only “for the purpose for which they are conferred”
Specific statutes - For example alteration of the articles and reduction of capital need a special resolution, which the directors must secure from the shareholders in general meeting before they can act.
Articles - For example the articles may set a maximum amount that the directors are entitled to borrow, any greater amount needing approval of the company in general meeting.
Members - The members can exercise control over the directors’ powers: a) by passing a special resolution to alter the articles, thereby re-allocating the powers between the board and the general meeting and b) ultimately by removing directors from office
What are the ‘general duties’ of directors?
- To hold general accountability
- To promote the success of the company
- To act within powers
- To exercise independent judgement
- To exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence
- To avoid conflict of interest
- Not to accept benefits from third parties
- To declare interest in proposed transaction or arrangement
(ASPIRIN – Accountability, Success, act within Powers, Independent judgement, Reasonable skill and care, declare an Interest, No benefits)
What is meant by a director must ‘act within powers’?
A director must:
* Act in accordance with the company’s constitution
* Exercise powers only for the purpose for which they were conferred.
If the directors infringe this rule by exercising their powers for a collateral purpose, the transaction will be invalid (unless it is approved or ratified by the company in general meeting)
If a director uses their powers irregularly to allot new shares to quash a majority, can the votes attached to these shares be used in reaching a desicion to sanction this action?
If the irregular use of directors’ powers is the allotment of shares, the votes attached to the new shares may not be used in reaching a decision in general meeting to sanction it.
What is meant by a director must ‘promote the success of the company’?
A director must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole. He should have regard to:
* The likely long term consequences of any decision
* The interests of the company’s employees
* The need to foster the company’s businesses relationships with suppliers, customers and others
* The impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment
* The desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct
* The need to act fairly as between members of the company
What is meant by a director must ‘exercise independent judgement’?
The director must have the ability to make decisions based on their own evaluation and thinking, rather than relying on others’ opinions.
However, it does not mean that he is not exercising independent judgment where he acts in accordance with:
* An agreement duly entered into by the company that restricts the future exercise of discretion by its directors
* The company’s constitution.
What is meant by a director must ‘exercise reasonable skill and care’?
The director must demonstrate to exercise the level of skill, care and diligence that would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person with:
* The general knowledge, skill and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person performing his functions as director
* His actual general knowledge, skill and experience.
Simply attending board meetings and not attending to the company’s interests in between meetings is unlikely to be sufficient.
What is meant by a director must ‘avoid a conflict of interest’?
A director must avoid a situation in which he has or can have a direct or indirect interest that conflicts or possibly may conflict with the interests of the company or another duty.
When would the duty to avoid a conflict of interest not be infringed despite the possibility of one arising? What protocols must take place?
The duty is not infringed if the matter has been authorised by the directors. This may happen:
* In a private company, provided the company’s constitution does not invalidate such authorisation
* In a public company, provided the company’s constitution expressly allows such authorisation
In each case, the relevant director cannot be counted towards a quorum and his votes will not be included in determining whether the authorisation is given
What is meant by a director must ‘not accept benefits from third parties’?
A director must not accept a benefit from a third party by reason of his:
* Being a director
* Doing (or not doing) anything as director
Unless the acceptance of the benefit cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest (i.e. benefit is immaterial/small)
What is meant by a director must ‘declare an interest in a proposed transaction’?
Directors must declare any interest they have in a proposed transaction with their company
The notice may be made:
* At a board meeting
* By notice in writing
* By a general notice, i.e. that he has an interest in the third party and is therefore to be regarded as interested in any transaction or arrangement with that third party (in which case he should take reasonable steps to ensure that such general notice is brought up at the next board meeting).
Provided such declaration is made, there is no need for approval by the members or the board, unless:
* The company’s constitution requires it
* It is an arrangement between a director and the company for the transfer of a ‘substantial non-cash asset’
What are the consequences if a director is found to breach any of these duties and as a result an action is bought by the company?
If an action is bought by the company the consequences include the following:
* To make good any loss suffered by the company, including secret profits
* Any contract entered into between the company and a director may be rendered voidable
* Any property taken by the director from the company can be recovered if it is still in his possession
* An injunction if the breach is continuing
* If more than one director is in breach then their liability will be joint and several.
What is wrongful trading?
Wrongful trading is a civil issue and applies only where a company goes into insolvent liquidation and the liquidator can show that, at some time before the commencement of the winding up, the director(s) knew or should have known that there was no reasonable prospect that the company could have avoided going into insolvent liquidation.
What will the courts consider when making a decision as to whether a director is liable for wrongful trading?
The standard applied is that of a reasonably diligent person with the general knowledge, skill and experience that might reasonably be expected of a person carrying out that particular director’s duties (i.e. a reasonable occupant of a similar post). Where a director has greater skill and experience than a ‘normal’ director, he is also judged by reference to his own capacity.
However, no declaration of wrongful trading will be made where the court is satisfied that the director(s) took every step that he or they ought to have taken in order to minimise the potential loss to creditors