Chapter 9 (Jmbalavo) Flashcards
(45 cards)
Essentially, what are capital budgeting decisions?
> Essentially, these are decisions related to investments in property, plant, and equipment.
What is the approach to capital management decisions?
> As you will see, the approach to the proper analysis of these decisions requires that we take into account the fact that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow.
> In other words, we must consider the time value of money.
Why are investment decisions extremely important?
> investment decisions are extremely important because they have a major, long-term effect on a firm’s operations.
What are capital expenditure decisions?
> Investment decisions involving the acquisition of long-lived assets
Investment decisions involving the acquisition of long-lived assets are often referred to as capital expenditure decisions because of what reason?
> because they require that capital (company funds) be expended to acquire additional resources.
What is another way to refer to investment decisions?
> Investment decisions are also called capital budgeting decisions.
What is the capital budget and what is capital budgeting?
> Investment decisions are also called capital budgeting decisions.
Crucial to an understanding of capital budgeting decisions is an understanding of what?
> Crucial to an understanding of capital budgeting decisions is an understanding of
In evaluating an investment opportunity, a company must know what?
> must know not only how much cash it receives from or pays for an investment but also when the cash is received or paid.
What does the time value of money concept recognize?
> The time value of money concept recognizes that it is better to receive a dollar today than it is to receive a dollar next year or any other time in the future.
> This is because the dollar received today can be invested so that at the end of the year, it amounts to more than a dollar.
When would a company not invest money into a project?
> Obviously, the company would not invest money in a project unless it expected the total amount of funds received in the future to exceed the amount of the original investment.
But by how much must the future cash flows exceed the original investment? To make it worth it (explain what is required)?
> Because money in the future is not equivalent to money today, we need to develop a way of converting future dollars into their equivalent current, or present, value.
> The techniques developed to equate future dollars to current dollars are referred to as present value techniques or time value of money methods.
What are the steps to the NPV method?
> The first step in using the net present value method is to identify the amount and time period of each cash flow associated with a potential investment.
> The second step is to equate or discount the cash flows to their present values using a required rate of return.
> The third and final step is to evaluate the net present value
What two cash flows are used in investments and what cash flows are relevant in the NPV method?
> Investment projects have both cash inflows (which are positive) and cash outflows (which are negative).
> the only relevant cash flows are those that are incremental—the cash flows that will be incurred if the project is undertaken. Cash flows that have already been incurred are sunk and have no bearing on a current investment decision.
What is the required rate of return?
> The second step is to equate or discount the cash flows to their present values using a required rate of return.
What is the net present value?
> The sum of the present values of all cash flows (inflows and outflows) is the net present value (NPV) of the investment.
According to the NPV, when should an investment be undertaken?
> If the NPV is zero, the investment is generating a rate of return exactly equal to the required rate of return. Thus, the investment should be undertaken.
> If the NPV is positive, it should also be undertaken because it is generating a rate of return that is even greater than the required rate of return.
When should an investment be rejected under NPV?
> Investment opportunities that have a negative NPV are not accepted because their rate of return is less than the required rate of return.
What is the difference between the NPVs of any two alternatives? What is a secondary way to assess the difference of two alternatives?
> The difference between the NPVs of any two alternatives
> Another way to evaluate alternatives is to compute the present values of their incremental cash flows.
What is the internal rate of return method?
> The internal rate of return method is an alternative to net present value for evaluating investment possibilities.
> Like net present value, it takes into account the time value of money. Specifically, the internal rate of return (IRR) is the rate of return that equates the present value of future cash flows to the investment outlay. In other words, it is the return that makes the NPV equal to zero.
According to the IRR, when should an investment be undertaken? When should it not?
> If the IRR of a potential investment is equal to or greater than the required rate of return, the investment should be undertaken.
> less than the required rate of return = reject the investment
When can IRR not be calculated? What do we do instead in those situations?
> For cases where cash flows are not equal each year, because we cannot divide the initial investment by a single cash flow annuity to yield a present value factor.
> Instead, we must estimate the internal rate of return and use the estimate to calculate the net present value of the project.
When should the IRR rate be increased and decreased?
> If the net present value is greater than zero (implying an internal rate of return greater than the estimate), the estimate of the internal rate of return should be increased.
> If the net present value is less than zero (implying an internal rate of return less than the estimate), the estimate should be decreased.
Although both the net present value method and the internal rate of return method take into account the time value of money, they differ in their approach to evaluating investment alternatives. Explain the difference:
> With net present value, any investment with a zero or positive net present value should be undertaken.
> With the internal rate of return method, any investment with an internal rate of return equal to or greater than the required rate of return should be undertaken