Chapters 35-39 Quiz Flashcards
(19 cards)
Hearsay Definition
Hearsay is an out of court statement being offered for the truth of the matter asserted.
Declarant Definition
The declarant is the person making the statement outside of the current trial or hearnig
What are the four concerns to address when talking about the reliability of a testimony?
- Perception
- Memory
- Clarity
- Sincerity
Hearsay is not admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise:
a federal statute, these rules, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court
Firsthand testimony is preferred to second hand testimony because (four reasons):
- Secondhand testimony doubles the possibility that one of the reporters is mistaken or lying
- Firsthand testimony can be tested by cross-examination
- The finder of fact can better evaluate the confidence and sincerity of the information if they can watch the individual report if firsthand
- At trial, firsthand testimony is made under oath in a formal, solemn setting
What type of statements are not hearsay if offered for… (not truth of the matter asserted)?
- Knowledge of the speaker
- Notice to a listener
- Publication in a defamation case
- Effect on the listener
- Legally binding statements
What is a statement?
- A person’s oral assertion
- A written assertion or
- Nonverbal conduct
Do most audiotapes contain verbal assertions?
Yes
Do most photographs and videotapes portray human assertions?
No
Do most machine readouts portray human assertions?
No, but if they convey a human assertion, then it would qualify as a statement.
How many exceptions are there to the hearsay rule?
31
Why are there so many hearsay exceptions?
- Some hearsay statements are more reliable than others
- Some hearsay statements are more needed than others
Nearly every exception to the hearsay rule rests in part on the special indicia of reliability. T or F?
True
What are the four categories of hearsay exceptions?
- Exemptions
- Unavailability of declarant
- Residual exception
- Availability of declarant doesn’t matter
Who decides if something is admissible as hearsay or not?
The judge under rule 104(a)
Why might the constitutional issue of whether hearsay exceptions may violate the Sixth amendment be raised?
Because when the court admits an out-of-court statement, the Defendant often lacks an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant who made the statement.
Which is the only time Sixth amendment issues can be brought up in relation to hearsay?
Criminal cases
Under Rule 801(d)(1), what conditions allows the admission of some prior statements by witnesses?
- The declarant testifies, and
- Is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement
If the conditions of 801(d)(1) are met, what types of prior witness statements are admissible?
- Statements that are inconsistent with the witness’s courtroom testimony (memory failure, statement given under penalty of perjury)
- Statements that are consistent with that testimony (witness credibility must be attacked, statement must be probative for rehabilitation, statement must have been made before the motive to fabricate or improper influence began)
- Pretrial identifications of a person