Civil War and Caesar's Dictatorship Flashcards
(47 cards)
How successful was Caesar in his command of Gaul in the 50s?
- Caesar enjoyed particular success in Gaul,
- He had been fortunate that hostile tribeshad moved into his area of influence as this gave him a pretext to start operations,
- But thereafter his contrived to fight successive Gallic and German tribes,
- He was honoured three times with public thanksgivings or supplicationes of unprecedented length,
- When Gallic tribes that had previously made their peace rebelled, he was not above widespread destruction, which at times amounted to genocide.
What did Caesar’s success in Gaul achieve him back home in Rome?
- The scale of his victories, the enormous wealth he built up, and the largesse through which he was distributing it meant that he was fast eclipsing Pompey as Rome’s most successful general,
- By the end of 51 BC, Caesar was looking for a triumphant return to Rome and a second consulship (in 48 would be the 10 year gap from Sulla’s reforms).
For what reasons did Caesar what a consulship in 48BC?
- Would make it easier to have his actions in Gaul sanctioned by the Senate,
- He could also hope to settle his veterans; he had raised several fresh levies through the Gallic wars, including non-citizens from Cisalpine Gaul to whom he had granted citizenship.
What did the Senate question of Caesar? What opposition did he have upon his return to Rome?
- Caesar’s political opponents questioned the reason for any continued command in Gaul when, by his own admission in his commentaries, no enemies remained,
- Some still harboured a desire to prosecute him over the actions of the first triumvirate,
- Others, most notably Cato and Ahenobarbus, wanted to prosecute him for attacks he had made on German tribes that were considered too far outside of his already considerable imperium,
For what legal reasons did Caesar want the consulship?
The consulship would save him from the indignity of a trial and allow him to secure a new proconsular command.
What was the most prominent reason for his want of consulship. according to Suetonius?
Overriding all else was his sense of honour.
‘… Asinius Pollio’s comment in his History …, where he says that Caesar, at Pharsalus, watching his enemies fly or be killed, said in these exact words: ‘They chose this; they would have condemned me, Gaius Caesar, despite my victories, if I had not sought the army’s help’ ‘
Suetonius, Deified Julius 30
For what reason did Pompey and Caesar end up as enemies?
- Pompey had briefly become the sole consul, as close as he might hope to get to a dictatorship, and despite Caesar’s military successes, Pompey saw himself as the pre-eminent man at Rome,
- The selfishness and intransigence of a few individuals, who were only a minority even among the optimates, would play on Pompey’s vanity and push him and Caesar into civil war. These included Cato and Ahenobarbus, and members of the Claudii Marcelli family.
What did Caesar use the tribunes for in 52BC?
To bring a law allowing him to stand for the consulship in absentia and remain safe in Gaul; at this point Pompey was in agreement.
How did Caesar attempt to win favour in Rome?
Through fresh displays of largesse. He put on games in honour of his recently deceased daughter, who had been Pompey’s wife. He also privately funded a new corn dole and gave away slaves from his Gallic spoils.
What law did Pompey pass to attempt to limit the power of Caesar 51BC?
Passed a law that required a five-year interval between holding a magistracy at Rome and a provincial command. This would prevent somebody, Caesar included, going from magistracy to provincial command with no opportunity to be held accountable for their actions in office.
What happened as a result of Pompey’s interval law?
A trawl of ex-consuls were sent to provincial commands, including Cicero, who begrudgingly set off to Cicilia, where he stayed abreast of events through correspondence.
What letter in 51BC tells us of a debate on Caesar’s command in Gaul? What happened in the debate?
- A letter of October 51 BC to Cicero (Cicero, ad Familiares 8.8.4-10),
- The consul for that year, M. Claudius Marcellus, proposed that the matter be decided after 1st March 50 BC; Pompey agreed that a decision was required after that date,
- Pompey went further and, when asked what he would do if Caesar disobeyed the Senate, said ‘what if my son wants to beat me with a stick?’ He was thus making a claim to seniority in the dispute and belittling Caesar as a naughty child trying to outwit his parent.
What dispute was there over the length of Caesar’s imperium in Gaul?
- Caesar genuinely saw things differently from his optimate opponents and Pompey,
- That Pompey and Marcellus were prepared to discuss Caesar’s recall after the 1st March 50BC suggests that they thought this was the proper date of termination,
- The law of Vatinius, which was passed in the first triumvirate 59BC, gave Caesar imperium for five years, probably due to expire on 1st March 54,
- In 55, Pompey and Crassus prolonged Caesar’s imperium by five years. Many sources make reference to the five-year extension, or of ten years in total (Cicero, ad Atticum 7.6),
- The issue is whether the second five years ought to run from 55, when the law was passed, or should be added to his original command and so not lapse until 1st March 49,
- This is the point that Caesar and his opponents disagreed.
Why would Caesar have been constitutionally secure in holding Gaul until 48BC?
- Constitutional convention gave him security because, until recently, provinces had needed to be allocated prior to a consul’s election,
- Therefore, the first magistrates who could take over from him were the consuls of 49, who would be elected in the summer of 50,
- These individuals would not normally leave Rome until the end of their consular year and so could not take over a province until the next year,
- Thus, while the legal limit of Caesar’s tenure might, in his view, have been 1st March 49, he could according to normal precedent expect to retain his province until the arrival of a successor at the beginning of 48BC,
How did Pompey’s interval law impact Caesar’s imperium in Gaul?
- Pompey’s legislation which required an interval of five years between a magistracy at Rome and a pro-magistracy in the provinces, changed the convention that would have protected Caesar’s imperium,
- Now any ex-consul could be allocated a province, Gaul included, and could proceed to that province immediately.
What did Caesar do by the start of 50BC?
- Had bought off the formerly establishment young noble Q. Scribonius Curio, who was tribune that year,
- Curio subsequently opposed repeated attempts by the consul for 50BC, C. Claudius Marcellus, the cousin of M. Marcellus, to strip Caesar of his imperium (Plutarch, Caesar 29-30).
What did Marcellus propose in December 50BC? What was the result?
- On 1st December 50, C. Marcellus proposed that Caesar should give up his command, but that Pompey should retain his,
- Curio reframed the question, proposing that both Caesar and Pompey should lay down their arms,
- Only twenty two senators voted against Curio, while 370 were in favour of both men standing down,
- It is clear, therefore, that the majority of the Senate favoured peace, but it is also true that they were impotent in the face of a few hardliners.
What did Caesar request in 49BC? Through who did he do this? Who supported this?
- Caesar sent letters via the new tribune for 49BC, Mark Antony and Q. Cassius Longinus, requesting that he retire to Cisalpine Gaul with just two legions until he could gain the consulship,
- This was later modified to Illyricum and one legion,
- Cicero, recently returned from Cilicia, apparently pushed for this and Pompey seemingly agreed (Suetonius, Deified Julius 29; Plutarch Caesar 31). Both Caesar and Pompey were willing to make concessions to avoid war.
How is Caesar’s 49 BC letter presented in Appian’s account?
The letters contents were more combative, with Caesar threatening to march on Italy if his requests were not met.
What did Q. Caecilius Metellus Scipio Nasica propose Caesar do? What happened to this proposal?
- He was Pompey’s new father-in-law, and in Caesar’s view Pompey’s mouthpiece,
- Proposed that Caesar either lay down command or be declared a public enemy,
- Mark Antony and Q. Cassius vetoed the proposal, but were threatened and together with Curio fled Rome to join Caesar (Caesar, the Civil War 1.1-3; Plutarch, Caesar 31).
How did the Senate respond to the Caesar’s letter? How did Caesar, in turn, respond?
- They reacted as if it were a declaration of war; Ahenobarbus was appointed Caesar’s successor in Gaul, the role he had long coveted,
- On 5th January 49BC, the SCU was passed again, mobilising all magistrates to defend the state. This specifically included Pompey, who still held imperium for Spain (Caesar, The Civil War 1.4-5),
- When the news of the SCU reached Caesar, he paraded before his men the abuse that the tribunes had suffered. He complained how the SCU was designed to deal with those who threatened Rome, not good honest Roman citizen soldiers such as his audience, and beseeched them to defend his dignity,
- That same night he crossed the Rubicon, the boundary of his province with Italy, and the limit of his legal imperium (Caesar, The Civil War 1.7; Plutarch, Caesar 32; Suetonius, Deified Julius 31-3).
What policy did Caesar implement in the civil war to ensure Italians joined his side? What does Cicero say of it?
- Caesar tended to pardon those he defeated, which resulted in many Italian communities coming over to him willingly,
- As a policy this is explicitly recorded in a letter which survives in Cicero’s correspondence, from Caesar to his political agents Oppius and Balbus (Cicero, C 9.7C),
- Cicero commented in another letter that the country people only cared about their fields and farms (ad Atticum 8.13),
- It is important to recognise that the common man would have cared more about his livelihood, and so favoured Caesar, than the Republican ideals and high politics with which Cicero and the later sources are concerned.
What coinage did Caesar print at the start of the civil war as propaganda?
The Denarius of Caesar
Date: 48-47 BC
Obverse: Female head wearing oak-wreath and diadem,
Reverse: Trophy with Gallic shield and carnyx; below, bearded captive seated with hands tied behind back; words reading ‘Caesar’,
Significance: Caesar reminds the Roman people of his Gallic successes.
What did Pompey do in response to Caesar’s military operation in Italy? In turn, what did Caesar do?
- Pompey had no forces in Italy to oppose Caesar,
- He fled to Greece to muster opposition, Caesar had no navy with which to pursue him and so he looked west to Spain, Caesar defeated Pompey’s lieutenants Afranius and Petreius,
- In the winter of 49-48, Caesar crossed to Greece.