Clinical Neuropsychology Flashcards
Paper 1 (223 cards)
What is clinical neuropsychology
studies the relaitonship between brain function / dysfunction and behaviour
Dysfunction can result from what three things
- Structural lesions (e.g. tumours, trauma)
- Metabolic issues (e.g. drug toxicity, liver failure)
- Neurochemical imbalances (e.g. Parkinson’s, schizophrenia)
5 approaches to assessment
- Psychometric (most common). Uses standardised tests and normative data.
- Localisation. Historically used for identifying lesion sites before neuroimaging; now more focused on lateralisation or frontal lobe testing.
- Ecological. Looks at how deficits affect real-world functioning.
- Functional. Looks at how cognitive impairments affect specific functions or abilities (without necessarily simulating real-world tasks).
- Observational, Self-report & Interviews
Complements psychometric testing with qualitative insights.
Explain how neuropsychological thinking developed on the models underlying assessment
+ key refereance influenced this change
Historically: localisation of function (e.g., Broca’s area for speech and Wernicke’s for language comprehension)
Now understand brain functions are distributed across systmes and so damage to any part alters function in different ways.
Luria (1973) - integrated view, the brain works as a functional system meaning multiple areas of the brain works together in a co-ordinated way to produce complicated behavioural output. Therefore damage to different parts of a system can disrupt the same function, but in different ways.
Neuropsychology is well placed to describe how pathology identified in scanning maniefests in cognitive functioning
Neuropsychological functions and hemispheric specialisations
Left hemisphere: language, verbal skills.
Right hemisphere: visuospatial functions.
Most right-handers and many left-handers have language dominance in the left hemisphere, but a small percentage of left-handers have language functions in right hemisphere or represented bilaterally (shared across both hemispheres).
This makes test interpretation more difficult.
two types of assessment strategies
and note the third combined strategy…
Fixed Battery (e.g., Halstead-Reitan): covers many domains; comprehensive but lengthy.
Flexible/Hypothesis Testing: tailored to referral questions; efficient but might miss unexpected issues.
Often a combined approach is used (screening test + targeted testing).
broad overview of neuroscience testing process (4 broad steps)
- Clarify purpose: diagnostic, rehabilitative, legal?
- Review case history (notes) and previous investigations.
- Conduct interview & observations.
- Administer tests, ensuring:
Inclusion of relevant domains:
Intellectual ability (current & premorbid)
Memory, language, attention
Executive function, perception, praxis
Mood & behaviour
Use of culturally appropriate normative data.
Name some information it would be useful to gether pre-assessment
- Demographics: age, sex, education, handedness, language, culture.
- Educational history: prior assessments, fluency in English, school performance.
- Medical history: imaging, prior assessments, psychiatric history.
- Injury history: trauma specifics, seizures, oxygen deprivation, surgeries.
- Testing considerations: medication, vision/motor issues, fatigue, mood.
key domains to interview patients and families on (4)
- Work & daily function
- Social interactions
- Personality & emotional changes
- Motor, language, memory, executive and spatial functions
describe 6 things to observe during testing
- Motor: gait, tremor, coordination, handwriting, clumsiness, slowness
- Language: amount of speech, fluency, understanding of instructions, ability to read/ follow written instructions, word-finding difficulties, unusual structure of speech
- Memory: Ability to recall basic information (age, d.o.b), orientation, recall of the session
- Spatial and visual awareness: neglect, visual tracking
- Personality/Behaviour: anxiety, insight, impulsivity, appropriateness
- Performance style: organisation, error-checking, impulsivity, concentration, perseveration
good neuropsychological report should include
Clearly state the purpose and context of assessment.
Describe the patient’s presentation and cooperation.
Be evidence-based, with objective findings and normative data.
Organise results by functional domain (not by test).
Include influencing factors (e.g. medication, mood).
Be structured, accessible, and clear on implications.
Suggested Structure:
Reason for referral
History (medical, family, educational)
Behavioural observations
Test results & interpretation (by domain)
Conclusions & recommendations
Appendix (summary scores, raw data if needed)
3 things neuropsychologists do
Conduct psychometric and functional assessments to understand behaviours that changed.
Design and deliver neurorehabilitation (psychoeducation about cognitive strategies, goal setting and cognitive strategy implementation, environmental modification).
Provide therapy (individual, family-based).
apraxia is a diagnosis by …
exclusion
Apraxia is now recognised as a key part of different neurodegenerative disorders (Stoll et al., 2025)
define apraxia
an impairment of the ability to carry out purposeful movements by an individual who has normal primary mototr skills and normal comprehension of the acts to be carried out
when does apraxia (and aphasia) often occur
following left hemisphere injury, particulalry stroke (note double dissociation so can have one without the other)
Exaplain Ideomotor apraxia
- Failure to execute gestures despite understanding
- Seen in 50–80% of dominant MCA stroke cases (Basso et al., 1987; Donkervoort et al., 2006)
- Lesions: left parietal, premotor, basal ganglia
- Error types: Spatial: wrong hand posture, Temporal: poor timing/sequence
- Content: irrelevant movements, perseveration
Explain ideational apraxia
- Trouble performing complex multi-step actions
- Misuse or misselection of tools
- Lesions: parieto-temporal, frontotemporal (Stoll et al., 2024)
- Note conceptual apraxia sometime included here or held separate. This is the impairment of object or action knowledge (e.g., misuse objects)
explain limb (kinetic) apraxia
this is an alternative way to classify apraxia: inaccurate or clumsy distal limb movements
- Meaningful gestures
Unable to produce meaningful gestures on demand (e.g., wave goodbye) - Can train gestures, but tend not to generalise so focus on useful ones
- Imitation of meaningless gestures
Person understands request to copy gesture, but gesture is spatially wrong. Impact in physiotherapy for example
Use of single tools and objects - Can fail for two reasons. 1. Loss of knowledge of the special function of the tool (e.g., use toothbrush on shoe), 2. Know the function of an object but can’t adapt action to constraints of the time (e.g., knows a knife cuts but cannot do the sawing motion)
- Multi-step actions with several tools and objects
- Sequencing of actions and maintenance of overall goal can lead to errors (even can successfully use a single object). Test by making a cup of tea or cutting paper with scissors
explain orofacial apraxia
another alternative classification: impairment of skilled movments involving face, mouth, tongue
Difficulty performing facial / oral gestures on command. Rarely noticed by individual themselves but problem for speech therapy for example.
4 Testing conditions for apraxia
2 things to hold in mind
two types of movement
- to verbal command
- by imitation of the examiner
- in response to a real, seen object
- when handling a real object
Hold in mind both meaningful and meaningless movements on left and ride sides
two types of movement:
transitive (so using objects) and intransitive (not using objects)
Clinical tips when administering tests for apraxia
Be sure to video record to help scoring
Clinical judgement, expertise and supervision are important
Name and reference the florida batteries for apraxia
- FAST-R (Florida Apraxia Screening Test); Rothi et al 1992
- FAB (Florida Assessment Battery); Rothi et al., 1992, 1997
- FABERS (Florida Apraxia Battery Extended and Revised Sydney); Power et al., 2010
Name, reference and explain the apraxia test
Apraxia Test (Van Heugten et al., 1999; Zwinkels et al., 2004)
Devised to overcome lack of standardised measures
Object use and imitation of gestures (ideational and ideomotor)
3 sets of objects, show me how you would use…
1. Presented by verbal request (key, saw, toothbrush)
2. Presented visually (spoon, hammer and scissors)
3. Handed to patient (eraser, comb, screwdriver)
Imitation of gesture
Name some specific apraxia tests (e.g., face apraxia
Face Apraxia assessed via Bizzozero et al., 2000 – useful has normative data allowing for age and education
Naturalistic assessment (Rothi et al., 1997) - e.g., video patients eating on ward
Cologne Apraxia Screening (CAS)
Dovern et al 2012 say this is a reliable and valid screening tool better than the AST
TULIA (Test of Upper Limb Apraxia)
Dovern et al 2012 say this is a good comprehensive test