Coding, Capacity & Duration (STM, LTM) Flashcards

1
Q

Coding in the SR is modality specific. This means…

A

That each sensory store (e.g. iconic for visual information) codes information differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did Baddeley (1966) investigate coding in the STM

A
  • he gave participants 4 lists of words to recall:
    -> List A contained similar sounding words, while List B didn’t.
    -> List C contained words with similar meanings while List D didn’t.

-> participants performed worse with list A than B, and with no difference between C & D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

After his experiment, what did Baddeley theorise

A

That STM is coded acoustically, meaning it organises information according to how it sounds, so similar sounding words can become muddled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Baddeley (1966) test the coding of LTM

A

-> he tested the participants recall of the lists from the STM experiment, after a 20 minute delay to ensure that information had passed into the LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were Baddeley’s LTM test results

A

-> participant recall of list C was worse than list D, and there was no difference between lists A and B.
-> this meant that LTM was coded semantically (organised according to meaning, so similar meaning words could be confused)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pro and Con of Baddeley’s STM & LTM experiment

A
  • lab experiment and therefore easy to replicate as variables would have been closely controlled (so reliability can be assessed)
  • findings have low ecological validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the capacity of the SR

A

Unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Jacobs (1887)’s test

A
  • digit span test to determine the capacity of STM:
    -> he gave participants several sequences of digits, asking them to repeat each sequence right after, in the correct order, with the list getting longer by 1 each time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Jacob’s find out

A

That on average we can hold 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters
That STM capacity gradually improves with age
(But this study was a long time ago, so validity is in question as it may not have been done as scientifically rigorous)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Miller (1956) do and conclude

A
  • reviewed psychological research studies, finding that the span of STM is 7 (+/-) 2.
    -> otherwise, new incoming info displaces the old stuff

-> that chunking (grouping large amounts of info into smaller groups) helps us remember more (as people remember 5 letters and 5 words the same)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the capacity of LTM

A

Unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Peterson & Peterson (1959) use nonsense trigrams to test STM duration

A
  • to prevent participants keeping the information in STM using maintenance rehearsal, they were asked to count backwards from 100 in threes:
    -> after 3 seconds, recall was accurate 90% of the time, but after 9 seconds, it dropped to 20% and then after 18 seconds, 2% of the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Peterson & Peterson (1959) conclude about the STM

A

That information in the STM lasts for 18-30 seconds without rehearsal, before it is lost to decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of Peterson & Peterson’s (1959) STM study

A

-> research can be said to have a high level of control, as it used standardised procedures & used fixed timings, whilst eliminating noise & other factors which could have influenced memory

-> findings could have been caused by interference, rather that the STM having a short duration (as different trigrams may have gotten confused)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duration of the SR

A

250 milliseconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Bahrick (1979) test LTM

A

-> tested 400 people of various ages (17-74) on their memory of their classmates
People shown 50 photos and deciding if they belonged to their class or not
+ free recall test: participants asked to list the names they could remember from their graduating class, with 90% accuracy found within 15 years of leaving school, dropping to 30% after 48 years

17
Q

What did Bahrick et al (1979) conclude about LTM

A
  • that it’s duration is potentially a lifetime, but sometimes we have retrieval failure and need retrieval cues to access the info
18
Q

Evaluation of Bahrick (1979) et al study of LTM

A

-> has high ecological validity (compared to Peterson) as material used was more relevant to everyday life
-> problematic to control for extraneous variables e.g. people staying in touch after school etc