Cognitive🔢 Flashcards

(131 cards)

1
Q

Processes of memory

A

Encode (info enters memory or slips away)
Storage (preserved for recollection in future or forgotten)
Retrieval (info recollected on tip of tongue)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Memory taxonomies

A

Multiple models that categorise memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Modal model of memory

A

TIME

Input➡️sensory memory ➡️STM ➡️⬅️LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sensory memory

Research

A

The Senses, modal special 250-500 ms iconic

Spelling partial report method- shown part of whole grid, report one row or whole grid. Recall perfectly with tone, late capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

STM

A

Increased by rehearsal and chunking
30-60s duration
Miller- 7 +/- 2 capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LTM

A

Transferred STM to LTM by rehearsal loop
Retrieved LTM to STM
Unlimited duration and capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Working memory

A

Combines Modal Model and LTM systems
Focus attention of different info and processing to anticipate next steps
Manipulate info in STM: active rehearsal and chunking
Maintain info while distracted

Reading span task- true or false sentence and remember last word in sentence: duration 3s (shorter than STM) and 3-5 capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Long term memory systems CONTENT

A

LTM (Decarative and Non declarative)

Declarative explicit - episodic and semantic
Non declarative implicit- procedural and other e.g. conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Declarative and non declarative

A

Declarative- aware of, can express

Non-declarative- difficult to bring to awareness and express

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Multicomponent model

A

CE (coordinates storage systems)

VSS PL (separate storage for visual/auditory info)
EB (bind multimodal info to episodic memories)

LTM (transfer between WM and LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Memory in brain areas (Lashley)

A

Search for engram (neural representation of a memory)
Side of lesion predicted memory performance
Distributed memory areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Areas of the brain and specific memory functions

A

Frontal cortex- working memory
Cortex-distributed memory storage
Cerebellum- form implicit memory
Hippocampus- form explicit memory
Amygdala- form implicit and emotional memory
Temporal- spatial memory and episodic storage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mental time travel

A

Re construct personal events from the past, imagine possible future scenarios, early memories

Chronesthesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reminiscence bump

A

Superior memory for events from adolescence

Childhood amnesia less than five years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Measuring memory:

Types of recall and recognition

A

Recall:
FREE (as many as can)
SERIAL (in order)
CUED (help of cues)

Recognition (verify of probe matched memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measuring memory:

Indirect memory task

A

Incidental encoding (not conscious) and implicit retrieval (seemingly unrelated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Improving encoding:

3 Levels something can be encoded

A

Structural (what looks like)
Phonetic (if word rhymes)
Category (type of word)

LTM is coded deeper, connects with knowledge already stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Improving encoding:

Spacing effect and varying cues

A

Better memory after distributed practice
Longer spacing-better memory

Varied retrieval cues changes circumstance (mood, environment) stored with material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Improving encoding:

Serial position

A

Info encoded first or last remembered better

Primacy- no interference, deeper processing
Recency- STM retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q
Improving retrieval:
Testing effect (re study vs recall)
A

Recall after 5 mins better with re study

Recall after 2 days/week better with recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Improving memory:

Encoding specificity

A

Better retrieval when context at encoding and retrieval is same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Improving memory:

Transfer appropriate processing

A

Match processing of encoding and retrieval aids episodic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Semantic memory network:

Collins and Quillian’s hierarchical network

A

Not economical to separately store representations
Representations: activation between nodes and their connecting paths
Superordinate, basic, subordinate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Semantic memory network:

Collins and Loftus network

A

Semantic relatedness between words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Theories of categorisation: Prototype theory and criticisms
Metal representation average of all members. Common and distinctive features Cannot explain how people can tell the size of categories e.g. dog breeds Can not explain how members are added to category
26
Theories of categorisation: Classical And Criticisms
Semantic memories form representations Make predictions, extract features Family resemblance- different members of category can share different features Central tendency-categories have an averaged ideal but some deviate Graded membership- some members more typical
27
Theories of categorisation: Exemplar theory And Criticisms
Separate representations of physical features of examples (seen before) Can tell category size can add new members Theoretical circularity-how can people retrieve all members to define category it’s based on category membership initially Can not explain how categories without features are formed
28
Theories of categorisation | Explanation based theory
Common characteristics rather than physical features | Can be created ad hoc (waterfowl can swim so have webbed feet)
29
Measuring categorisation tests
Typicality rating- how good of an example from category it is Exemplar production-recall as many items from category as you can Category membership verification-asked if fits the category or not
30
Schemata
Capture commonly encountered aspects of life, predictions | Schemas= order of events temporally ordered
31
5 primary schema processes
``` Selection Abstraction Interpretation Integration Reconstruction ```
32
Schema processes: selection
Select info central to schema Study text without context, with context before or with context after Those told context before recalled the most Encoding of schema relevant info
33
Schema processes: abstraction
Objects consistent to schema are retrieved 7 or 4 looks like either Ambiguities are converted to abstract representation that captures the meaning and consistent with schema
34
Schema processes: interpretation
Filled gaps with schema consistent info “Dropped the glass” Most assumed dropped glass dropped glass was broken
35
Schema processes: integration
Permissible inferences Chair on box to right of tree, infer chair to right of tree Infer chair to right of tree Integrate schema, schema consistent holistic representations
36
Schema processes: reconstruction
Meet own schema Reconstruct Native American tale to meet own cultural schema Details reconstructed, simplified Participants recalled items in waiting room of postgrad that wasn’t there
37
Schacter’s seven sins of memory
``` Transience Absentmindedness Misattribution Blocking Bias Amnesia Persistence Suggestibility ```
38
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: TRANSCIENCE | Decay and research
DECAY- forgetting over passage of time Thorndike’s law of disuse: memory decays with longer time it isn’t used Rows of nonsense trigrams, most forgetting is early and continues slowly BUT passage of time causes nothing itself, correlated with forgetting
39
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: TRANSCIENCE | Interference and research
INTERFERENCE- forgetting from memory competition Proactive- older memories impair retrieval of new Retroactive- newer memories impair retrieval of old Brown-Peterson paradigm- learn trigrams then recall after distracting task (varying hours) better memory with less retroactive interference, remembered if go straight to sleep
40
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: ABSENTMINDEDNESS
Lapses of attention that affect memory In lecture almost half has task unrelated thoughts, caused poorer results in test
41
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: BLOCKING
Info present but temporarily inaccessible Resolving tip of the tongue may prevent it recurring later
42
``` Schacter’s seven sins of memory: MISATTRIBUTION Source monitoring (where memories come from) ```
Attribute memories to incorrect source Internal-real/imagined External- who told you Reality- real or heard about
43
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: MISATTRIBUTION | Source info types
Perceptual- detail highly if memory actually experienced Contextual- context memory acquired is consistent with expected source Affective-emotional reaction Cognitive- mental processing of info
44
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: MISATTRIBUTION | Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm
People falsely recall semantically similar words that were never presented
45
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: SUGGESTIBILITY
Implement memory which never occurred 25% falsely remember lost in a mall 50% falsely remembered doctored photograph More false beliefs when encouraged to guess, 20% forced confabulation, especially with confirmatory feedback
46
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: BIAS
Distort past memories based on current knowledge and beliefs Hindsight bias- misremember memories as being more similar to current knowledge Recall German election result as more similar to real results that what predicted at first
47
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: PERSISTENCE
Unwanted recollections that cannot be forgotten
48
Schacter’s seven sins of memory: AMNESIA
Deficit in memory caused by brain damage, disease or trauma Can encode new memories but not explicitly retrieve them (HM) Retrograde-cannot access memories prior to event Anterograde- loss of ability to store new memories after the event
49
Eyewitness memory (recognition/recall)
Memory for crime or other dramatic or witnessed event Recognition- identify from mugshots Recall- statement or testimony Loftus and Palmer ‘Smashed’ 2x more likely to say yes to broken glass than hit
50
Post event information | 3 explanations
Memory replacement theory- overwrites original Blocking theory-original info blocked but still present, retroactive interference Source monitoring- info from other sources mistaken for real memory Loftus- Questioning with consistent misleading info (stop/yield sign) asked with sign seen vs other sign Misleading info alters memory
51
Effects of implicit social demands on memory
Watch video with tonic vs alcohol placebo, read info with or without misinformation Those thinking they drank alcohol were more susceptible to misinformation
52
Effects of stress on memory (navy personnel)
Navy personnel, group speech with or without doctored video Interrogate with or without photo Questionnaire with or without misinformation All led to false memories, 84% misidentified unrelated photo as interrogator
53
Vulnerable eyewitnesses
Children etc more errors ``` Reinforcement/feedback Repeat questions Co-witness information/pressure Invite speculation Introduce new info ```
54
Children eyewitness research
Read picture book Closed and unanswerable questions= less correct responses Answer given even if don’t understand
55
False confessions research
Plant memory over 3 interviews Context accurate cues, incontrovertible evidence, social pressure, suggestive retrieval prompts, rapport and facilitators, pages and silence, disappointment and sympathy 70% had false memories of committing crime with police contact but reduced to 26-30% when explicit statement of memory
56
Arousal effect
Yerkes-Dodson U curve- medium stress for optimum memory Easter brook hypothesis- attention and arousal interact to determine cue utilisation more for central details Weapon focus- increased memory for weapon, others decline Unusual item hypothesis- unusual objects attract attention inconsistent with schema
57
Eyewitness confidence and accuracy correlation
Accuracy-confidence correlation r=.29 Affected by: Confirmatory feedback Repeated questioning- less accurate, more retrieval fluency External motivation-neutral motivation correlated higher with confidence r=.44 than money
58
Improving eyewitness memory
Aware of effects on eyewitness memory/ confidence Minimise contamination of memory Double blind procedures minimise unconscious biases Only one suspect with at least 5 known innocent fillers Minimise motivation, tell witness suspect may not be in lineup Assess confidence at identification
59
When can eyewitness memory be reliable
Memory probed for first time, not contaminated yet Interview protocols avoid suggestive questions and minimise guessing Investigator sensitive to witness’ level of confidence
60
Cognitive interview
``` Reinstate context (encoding specificity principle) Recall from different points Report everything Take different perspectives Don’t interrupt witness ``` Increase in correct details highest for older adults (more influenced by misleading info and prone to source monitoring details)
61
Categorisation theories
Emeplar Classical Explanation based Prototype
62
Language
Exchange of info, acquired from the womb Speak fluently by 3 years Spoken, written or signed words to communicate meaning, requires understanding of syntax
63
Hockett’s design features of language
Speaking (vocal-auditory)channel-humans and animals Combine units to create meaning-humans Speech organ, adapted-humans Comprehension (interchangeability)-humans INPUT (speech) ACTIVATE (mental representations of sounds) and LINK TO (meaning) OUTPUT (comprehension)
64
Sapir wharf theory
Way we think is affected by our language Colour perception and word order affected by language Recognise words immediately and link to mental representation and meaning
65
Main language functions
Speaking and Writing-production Reading and understanding-comprehension
66
Speech production processes
Structure to communicate (subject-verb-object) Activate phonological representation Say out loud (Semantics-syntax-morphology-form)
67
How is Lexicon ordered
Ordered by associative semantic network (activate things of similar meanings) linked to form and syntax to express concept
68
What is lexical assess based upon (what are words activated on)
Mechanisms activate words on frequency and semantic and phonological relatedness
69
Sentences and phrases
Sentence =Noun phrase + verb phrase Noun phrase= determiner + noun Verb phrase= verb
70
Morphemes
Morpheme-smallest meaningful unit of sound Free morphemes-e.g. cat Suffix-catS Preffix-UNderstood
71
Phonemes
Roughly 40 | Graphemes represent phonemes
72
Pragmatics
Context | Grice’s Maxims= quality, quantity, relation, manner
73
Spreading activation
Similar meanings and similar sounds compete for selection
74
Spreading activation evidence
More hesitations humanities lectures, synonyms compete for attention Slip of tongue from same category Phrases planned, words slotted in with syntactic/morphological elements left in place
75
Speech production errors | semantic blend, semantic and morpheme exchange and word and phoneme exchange
Semantic blend error “spork” Semantic and morpheme exchange “slicely thinned” Word and phoneme exchange “Lork yibrary”
76
Explain tip of the tongue | Research
Activation and competition between related items. Blocked retrieval of target word Fragment competition task-asked to fill in blanks, related words compete for selection Italian speakers-know noun gender but can’t access (syntax and form processed differently)
77
Coarticulation
Sounds overlap, variations in how phonemes are produced | Sound changes when followed with different articulation (‘n’ in thin pronounced differently when proceeds a ‘b’ or ‘c’)
78
Comprehension challenges
Problems understanding- fail to link phonemes with meaning | Reverse process for speech
79
Comprehension input and output
Input (speech) Activate (mental representations of sound) and Link to meaning Output (comprehension) Comprehension: speech, form, syntax and morphology, semantics
80
Ambiguity at different levels
SPEECH (acoustic input)-hard to tell where one word ends and begins WORD LEVEL-similar sounds or spellings with different meanings PHONEME LEVEL- words change the way they sound depending on context
81
Word level ambiguity (homonyms/homographs/holographs)
Homonyms- words and sound spelt the same (Bank and bank) Homophones-words sound the same (mussel and muscle) Holographs-words spelt the same but different sound (read and read)
82
What causes phoneme level ambiguity
Different constants-air hits point in mouth Place of articulation-causes obstruction, constant sound Coarticulation- sounds change in sentence when followed by sound with different articulation
83
``` Sound perception Categorical perception (distinguishing sounds) ```
Perceive sounds at one end of continuum or another (instead of processing all variation between two sounds) infants can distinguish between phonemes
84
Sound perception | Defining sounds
Point at which vocal chords vibrate relative to release of closure (voice onset time)
85
Syntax and phonology order of processing
Syntax of a phrase is processed before phonology
86
P B vibrations
P vibration begins instantly | B pause after, vibration then begins
87
Regional accents (invariance problem)
Unable to define categories of sounds, difficult to identify common features that correspond to phonemes (in accents)
88
Understanding speech with cough
Phonological representation of word allows us to still understand
89
Top down processing
Match input to existing mental representations to understand oncoming language More frequently used words are recognised faster, multiple morphemes take longer to recognise. Similar spelling slower to recognise
90
Frequency in lexical access
Easier/quicker to access words used frequently with fewer neighbours
91
Testing lexical access
Press for ‘word’ or non word and assess speed | Quicker reaction time for words with fewer neighbours
92
Impact of meaningful context (word monitoring task research )
Say word quickly as possible when heard in sentence Measure delay period until word is said If made sense ( meaningful context): say word quicker, comprehend meaning before next word is heard- phonological representation already activated
93
Priming paradigm | Cross modal and findings
CROSS MODAL: primed with visual and auditory target at same time, asked if visual word is real or not CAPT (captain or capture) Related to either ship or slave or unrelated Quicker reaction to both related words than unrelated If presented half way through word=primed for both outcomes. If primed at end of word, unrelated concepts are deactivated
94
Conditioning importance
Fundamental to learning, explain behaviours and habits Relevant for drug addiction e.g. cues and relapse Precise stimuli, well controlled experiments Can generalised to more complex learning Apply to AI in teaching Types of learning is similar across species Functional analogies: same learning function implemented differently in structural brains
95
Classical conditioning
US- UR US+CS-UR CS-UR
96
Aversive conditioning (phobias)
Unconditioned stimulus can also be aversive, understanding phobias, anxiety ``` One shot (single trial) learnt quickly and long lasting Evolutionary principle to think stimulus caused response to avoid it for safety ```
97
Extinction
Remove unconditioned stimulus to see how strong the associations are. Present conditioned stimulus alone Reduction in response to CS is extinction new associations learnt much faster however
98
Spontaneous recovery
Resting period between last day of extinction and test trail Response to CS returns Original learning not completely erased
99
Generalisation
Introduce another stimulus (shares resemblance) Respond with CR to new stimulus We are not overtrained in specific examples
100
Discrimination
Similar stimulus but do not respond with CR to new stimulus | Pay attention to differences
101
Second order conditioning
Pair similar conditioned stimulus with conditioned (CS1 + CS2) - CR CS1 acts as US CS2 also triggers conditioned response Learning in longer chains of associated stimuli
102
Trial, block and session definition
Trial-single presentation of a CS-US Block-several traits, specific parameters Session- one or more blocks, sessions usually separated by intervals (hours/days)
103
Partial reinforcement
Random trials where CS is not followed by US. Slowed acquisition and extinction (difficult to link)
104
Partial reinforcement of trials (fixed ratio, variable ratio, fixed interval, variable interval)
Fixed ratio-behaviour reinforced after specific number of responses Variable ratio-behaviour reinforced unpredictable number of responses (high responses despite low enforcers) Fixed interval-behaviour reinforced after specific amount of time Variable interval-behaviour reinforced after unpredictable amount of time
105
Temporal sequences trace and delay conditioning Which easier to learn?
Trace conditioning-gap between CS offset and US onset Delay condoning-CS offset overlap with US onset Delay is easier learn (no time gap)Time gap requires hippocampus
106
Blocking
Pair CS1 with US and add in CS2 alongside | Presenting CS2 alone does not trigger UR
107
Operant conditioning
US presented when animal performs behaviour, outcome reinforced or punished Thorndike’s law of effect- more likely to repeat behaviour that has a pleasant outcome in similar situation Positive reinforcement-reward Negative reinforcement- remove unpleasant Positive punishment-unpleasant is present Negative punishment-remove pleasant reward
108
Reward magnitude
Pigeons peck keys for large or small reward | Bigger reward=faster learning initially but levels off
109
Shaping
Divide learning goal into stages, reinforce individual steps
110
Primary and secondary reinforcers
Primary reinforcer- stimuli naturally preferred Secondary reinforcer-neutral event associated with primary reinforcer e,g, bell for food
111
Cognition
Basis for intelligent behaviour, overrides reflective habitual responses for more complex goals Gathers info from memory systems and interacts with motor systems Top down processing-higher order goals
112
The cortex and birds
Birds do not have neocortex Pallium more like a cortex (grey and white matter covering cerebellum) Nidopallium (NCL) is functionally compared to mammalian prefrontal cortex, contains caudolateral
113
Scala naturae
Living hierarchy, simple to more complex | Assumes only humans have insight related cognition (neocortex)
114
Working memory and monkeys
Delayed response task, left or right light for 1 sec, 2-3 sec delay before has to move lever in direction of light Neurons increase activity in delay period to hold in working memory or decrease when doesn’t need to
115
Dopamine and classical conditioning
Before learning-spike in dopamine after reward After learning- spike after conditioned stimulus ( not reward) Reward omission (decrease in responses after but spike still after conditioned stimulus)
116
Dopamine and working memory
Dopamine tag sensory cues as relevant Neurons show delay activity while item kept in working memory Delay between stimulus and choice may be basis for working memory
117
Pigeons and working memory and findings
Directed forgetting, record activity in NCL Remember: pecks sample, remember cue, delay and test period Forget: animal pecks sample cue, forget cue for 2 secs Activity increase in remember cue phase and delay (holds in WM) and test period Forget trials: activity activated but decreases as doesn’t hold info in WM
118
Crows working memory and findings and neurons
Delayed match to sample task, choose from 4 options after delay Selection performance above chance Sample selective neuron (selective during samples) distinguishes samples with firing rate Delay selective neuron (selective during delay) More than half neurons were either sample or delay selective or both Firing rate of neurons does not distinguish different stimuli as well as in correct trials
119
Bird brain conclusions
Delay activity in NCL bridges time gap between stimulus and choice, neural basis for working memory Neural circuits for WM have probably evolved several times and do not require neocortex NCL and prefrontal cortex might be functionally analogue
120
Bees working memory and results
Delayed match to sample task in a tunnel short delay: high performance WM up to 6 seconds Incorrect pattern:still identify correct sample
121
Rule learning crows and results
Pick stimulus from sample or pick stimulus not from sample Visual/auditory cue determines which Measure NCL activity High NCL firing for non match, low for match rule
122
Rule learning bees
Two samples in tunnel First indicates correct pattern OR second indicates correct pattern Can learn both
123
Bees generalisation
New visual stimuli in tunnel Still performs above chance Indicates bees can generalise to more abstract task rule
124
Learning abstract concept bees
Delayed match to sample Match odour at entrance to one in decision chamber Perform above chance, cross modal transfer of learning
125
Higher order cognitive functions
Self recognition Theory of mind Object permanence
126
Self recognition: birds and mirror task
Yellow dot on bird, looks in mirror Mark directed behaviour (touch mark with foot or beak) Self directed behaviour (touch other body parts) Activity towards mark (mark directed behaviour divide by self directed behaviour) Birds show significant MARK DIRECTED BEHAVIOUR
127
Self recognition and evolution
Neural mechanisms enable self recognition, evolved several times in vertebrates Laminated cortex not a necessity for self recognition Evidence against scala naturae and cortex is special
128
Theory of mind: ravens | Focus on ground
Raven on ground (focus) given food and hides it. Another raven observes it (visible to focus) and control cannot see where food is (blind) Either sighted or blind observer taken out with focus When focus is with observer, focus hides food again twice as often. Aware the bird has knowledge of where the food was
129
Theory of mind: ravens | Focus as observer
Focus observes ground bird hide food, has a blind co-observer and sighted co-observer Focus bird taken out with blind OR the other sighted bird with hider Focus runs to food when with co-observer (knows he saw too) much faster than with blind. Take longer with blind time make it seem like he doesn’t know either Distinguishes between different levels of knowledge
130
Object permanence in birds
Higher Piagetian stages develop gradually as bird ages. Step from 4 to 5 is challenging- A not B error before stage 5 (search where object was hidden previously) Can reach full object permanence
131
Comparing rodents vs birds in higher order cognitive function
Rodents have cortex unlike birds Rodents easy to maintain, birds hand reared Rodent episodic memory, birds several forms of insight related cognition Rodents strong olfaction, birds visual and auditory (like humans) Rodents bad for cognitive ageing vs birds live long time Rodents can use ontogenetics unlike birds