Cognitive Approach Studies Flashcards

1
Q

Aim of Loftus and Palmer

A

To investigate whether the use of leading questions (specifically different verbs) would affect participants’ estimation of the speed of vehicles in a car accident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Participant makeup of Loftus and Palmer

A

45 student participants, divided into 5 groups of 9.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Films watched in Loftus and Palmer

A

7 short films of traffic accidents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Questionnaire content in Loftus and Palmer

A

A questionnaire including 1 critical question about the speed of the cars.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Verbs used in Loftus and Palmer

A

Smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contacted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Average speed estimate of the ‘smashed’ group

A

40.8 mph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Average speed of the ‘contacted’ group

A

31.8 mph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conclusion of Loftus and Palmer

A

The wording of the question influenced memory recall, suggesting that memory is reconstructive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aim of Brewer and Treyens

A

To investigate the role of schema in the encoding and retrieval of episodic memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Participant makeup of Brewer and Treyens

A

86 university psychology students.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Office items in Brewer and Treyens

A

Participants were told to wait in an office containing both schema-congruent items and schema-incongruent items.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Example of a schema-congruent office item

A

Calendar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of a schema-incongruent item

A

Skull.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recall time in Brewer and Treyens

A

After 35 seconds, participants were moved to a room and asked to recall what they saw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ways used to recall objects in Brewer and Treyens

A

Written recall, verbal recognition, drawing recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Recall scores in Brewer and Treyens

A

Written recall and verbal recognition (30), Drawing recall (29), Verbal recognition (27).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Schema-congruent items recall in Brewer and Treyens

A

Schema-congruent items were more frequently recalled across all conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Conclusion of Brewer and Treyens

A

Memory is influenced by schemas during both encoding and recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Aim of Loftus and Palmer Broken Glass study

A

To investigate whether post-event information (the verb used in the speed estimate question) would influence participants’ memory of an event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Participant makeup of Loftus and Palmer BG

A

150 students, divided into 3 groups of 50.

21
Q

Speed question wording in Loftus and Palmer BG

A

Group 1 was asked about speed using the word ‘smashed’ and group two was asked about speed with the word ‘hit.’

22
Q

Time frame for asking about broken glass in Loftus and Palmer BG

A

Participants were asked 1 week later if they had seen broken glass (none was present in the film).

23
Q

Speed estimate and broken glass recall in Loftus and Palmer BG

A

The speed estimate of the smashed group was 10.46 mph, and 16 participants said they saw broken glass.

24
Q

Loftus and Palmer - speed estimate of the hit group

A

8.00 mph, 7 participants.

25
Loftus and Palmer - conclusion
Leading questions not only influenced speed estimates but also altered memory of details (false memory of broken glass).
26
Aim of Tversky and Kahneman
To investigate how positive and negative framing influences decision-making in a hypothetical life-or-death situation.
27
Sample of Tversky and Kahneman
self-selected sample of 307 U.S. undergraduate students.
28
Tversky and Kahneman - number of programs
2
29
Tversky and Kahneman - assignment method
Randomly assigned, positive, negative, disease outbreak.
30
Tversky and Kahneman - Program A
200 people will be saved.
31
Tversky and Kahneman - Program B
⅓ chance 600 saved, ⅔ chance none saved.
32
Tversky and Kahneman - Program C
400 people will die.
33
Tversky and Kahneman - Program D
⅓ chance nobody dies, ⅔ chance 600 die.
34
Tversky and Kahneman - Positive Frame choice percentage
72% chose the sure gain (Program A).
35
Tversky and Kahneman - Negative Frame choice percentage
78% chose the risky option to avoid certain loss (Program D).
36
Conclusion of Tversky and Kahneman
Framing significantly affects decision-making. People prefer certainty in gain (risk-averse) and risk in loss (risk-seeking). Demonstrates loss aversion and System 1 thinking.
37
Aim of Tversky and Kahneman Number study
To investigate how anchoring (initial information) influences numerical estimation.
38
Tversky and Kahneman - participant makeup
High School students.
39
Tversky and Kahneman - group task
Each group was given a multiplication sequence in either ascending or descending order.
40
Tversky and Kahneman - ascending group median estimate
512
41
Tversky and Kahneman - descending group median estimate
2250
42
Tversky and Kahneman - actual value
40320
43
Tversky and Kahneman - conclusion
The initial number (anchor) influenced the final estimate. Participants relied on the first number in the sequence to guide their decision—demonstrating the anchoring bias and System 1 thinking.
44
Aim of Brown and Kulik
To investigate whether surprising and personally significant events can cause flashbulb memories.
45
Brown and Kulik - participant makeup
80 American male participants (40 black and 40 white).
46
Brown and Kulik - questionnaire topics
participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their memories on MLK and John F. Kennedy as well as someone personally significant.
47
Brown and Kulik - vivid memories percentage
75% of the participants had vivid memories of the assassination of JFK.
48
Brown and Kulik - flashbulb memories percentage
75% of black participants had flashbulb memories of MLK, whereas only 33% of white participants did.
49
Brown and Kulik - conclusion
suggests that emotionally significant and personally relevant events are more likely to be remembered in vivid detail, forming what are known as flashbulb memories.