Cognitive Psychology Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What is the assumption for cognitive psychology?

A

Assumes behaviour is influenced by inner mental processes (our thoughts and perceptions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 studies in Cognitive Psychology?

A

Grant = contemporary

Loftus and Palmer = Classic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 stages of memory?

A

Encoding
Storage
Retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is context dependent memory?

A

When we remember better if the context is the same at encoding and retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the aim of Grant’s study?

A

To investigate if performance on a memory test is improved when the environment is the same at encoding and retrieval compared to different environment at encoding and retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many participants were in grant’s study?

A

39 (1 participants result taken out of experiment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the age range of Grant’s study?

A

17-56

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many conditions were there and how many participants in each?

A

4 conditions with 10 participants in each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give an example of one of grants matching and mismatching conditions

A

Studied text in silent and tested in silent = matching

Studied text in silent and tested in noisy conditions = mismatching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how did grant’s procedure start?

A

Standardised instructions read aloud to each participant.

P’s all read same article on psychoimmunology and either studied it in silent or noisy conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened second in the procedure in grants study?

A

All wore headphones and were given 2 minute break before being tested with short answer questions and then mcq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the background noise used in the noisy condition in grants study?

A

Noise recorded during lunch time at a university cafeteria e.g general hum of chatter but couldn’t hear complete sentences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give 2 findings from grants study

A

In SAQ’s matching condition silent study silennt test = 6.7 / 10

Mismatching condition silent study noisy test = 4.6 / 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can you conclude about Grant’s study?

A

Memory is improved by the environment when the context is the same at encoding and retrieval.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the independent variable in grant’s study?

A

Whether they studied in silence or noise and whether they were tested in silence or noise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the dependent variables in grants study?

A

What the p’s scored on the SAQ’s out of 10 and MCQ’s out of 16

17
Q

What research design was grant’s study?

A

Independent measures

18
Q

What was the aim of loftus and palmers first experiment?

A

To investigate whether leading questions given after witnessing an event, influences memory for that event

19
Q

What was the aim of loftus and palmers second experiment?

A

To investigate whether memory of the accidents can actually be changed by the verbs

20
Q

Describe the participants from experiment 1 of loftus and palmer

A

45 american students from the university of washington

21
Q

In the first experiment how many film clips did the p’s watch?

22
Q

what were p’s given after watching the 7 film clips in the first experiment?

A

a questionnaire which included the critical question of ‘About how fast were the cars going when they … into eachother?’

23
Q

What were the 5 verbs used in the critical question in experiment 1?

A
Smashed
Bumped
Collided
Hit
Contacted
24
Q

Give 2 findings from experiment 1’s results

A

Smashed mean estimate = 40.8mph

Contacted mean estimate = 31.8mph

25
What can you conclude from experiment 1’s data?
Memory is affected by leading questions. The intensity of the verb changed the memories of the estimated speed of the accidents
26
Describe the participants in experiment 2
150 different American students from University of Washington
27
What did participants watch in experiment 2?
A 1 minute film clip which included multiple car accidents lasting 4 seconds each
28
How many conditions were there in experiment 2?
3 = Smashed (50) Hit (50) Control (50)
29
What were participants asked in experiment 2?
‘about how fast were the cars going when they .... into eachother’
30
How long did P’s go away for in experiment 2?
1 week
31
When coming back what was the closed question participants were asked in experiment 2?
Did you see any broken glass?
32
Give 2 findings from experiment 2
The smashed condition had 16 people say they saw broken glass and the hit condition had 7 say they saw broken glass
33
What can you conclude from experiment 2?
Leading questions used after an event can reconstruct a persons memory
34
What was the independent variable in both experiments?
The verbs used
35
What was the dependent variable of each experiment?
1= estimate of speed when cars crash (mph) 2= whether there was broken glass
36
give 2 similarities between grant and loftus and palmer
Ethical Quantitative Data
37
Give 2 differences between loftus and palmer and grant’s study
L+P= low EV whereas G= high EV L+P= used uni students whereas G used= age range of 17-56
38
Give a strength of loftus and palmer and a strength of grant
Ethical Quantitative data= easy to analyse
39
Give 2 weaknesses of loftus and palmer and grant
L+P = p’s could feel distressed watching the clips G= could be individual differences L+P = low EV G= young mean age meaning most Ps young meaning lacks population validity