Con Law Flashcards
(155 cards)
Federal courts are empowered to decide
cases and controversies (Federal Question & Diversity Jx)
Note: Cannot decide any legal questions (e.g. proposed legislation, Ct. CANNOT opine on constitutionality until passed)
Under the 11th amendment, State’s may not be sued for monetary damages or injunctive relief for violating state law in federal court unless
(1) the State consents to the suit, OR
(2) Congress chose to abrogate (repeal) that sovereign immunity through an enumerated power
Limitations of the 11th amendment for monetary suits against States protects only
States themselves and state agencies, but NOT:
(1) local governments
(2) Individual state officers
(3) Suits for injunctive relief
Exceptions to the 11th amendment and state sovereign immunity are
(1) Congress abrogate state sovereign immunity to enforce certain individual rights (intent to abrogate must be clear and be related to federal power under the Civil War amendments - 13, 14, 15)
(2) State consents to the suit (either express or implied through ratification of the Constitution)
The Supreme Court’s docket is
Discretionary (4 justices must agree to grant cert)
The Supreme Court cannot hear a case from a state court when
there are adequate and independent state grounds for deciding the case
Adequate and Independent State Grounds (AISG) is relevant only if the case
(1) Is in the US Supreme court
(2) Arises through a writ of certiorari, and
(3) Has already been decided by a state court
In reference to AISG, Adequate means
State law controls decision, regardless of how federal issue would be decided
In reference to AISG, independent means
State court’s ruling does not depend on an interpretation of federal law
US constitution sets a floor, not a ceiling for individual rights. States can always create additional rights
Standing are limitations on
WHO can bring a suit (not the substance of the suit itself)
Constitutional Elements of Standing
(1) Injury in fact (concrete - actual or imminent and particularized (not abstract)
(2) Causation
(3) Redressability (relief requested from court must be able to prevent or remedy injury)
Common Standing Doctrines
(1) Taxpayer Standing
(2) Organizational Standing
(3) Legislative Standing
(4) Third party standing
Taxpayer standing is
taxpayers have standing to challenge their own tax assessment / liability but cannot challenge government expenditures
Exception: Can challenge if they violate the Establishment Clause (religion)
Organizational standing is
standing of an organization to sue if
(1) Members would have standing to sue in their own right, and
(2) Interests at stake are germane to the organization’s purpose
Legislative Standing
Legislators LACK standing to challenge laws they voted against but the legislature may have institutional standing if the claim has something to do with institutional functions
Third Party Standing
Generally not permitted except for:
(1) Doctors on behalf of patients
(2) School on behalf of students
(3) Bar render on behalf of customers
(4) Parent on behalf of child (but may be limited to custodial parent)
A federal court will not consider a claim if it is
unripe (brought too soon) or Moot (no real case or controversy)
A claim will not be dismissed as moot if
“capable of repetition yet evading review”
a person will be subject to same action over and over again and action will not last long enough to work its way through judicial system (think gestational period and abortion)
The political question doctrine prevents courts from hearing issues when
(1) The constitution assigns decision making authority on this subject to a different branch of government, or
(2) The matter depends on that person’s discretion such that there is no law for the judge to apply
Political questions = non-justiciable
-Note: validity of a federal statute is NOT precluded by political question doctrine
4 Abstention Doctrines
(1) Pullman: Unsettled state law
(2) Younger: Pending state criminal case
(3) Burford: Parties seeking injunctive relief that would interfere with complex state regulatory scheme
(4) Colorado River: Case is substantially similar to another case being heard in state court
Common wrong answers for source of Congressional power
(1) General Welfare Clause (there is no general power to legislate for general welfare)
(2) Police Power (only states have this power, Federal government cannot “commandeer”)
(3) Necessary and Proper Clause (no power on its own, must be used in addition to another legislative power)
Forms of Activities under the Commerce Clause
(1) Channels of interstate commerce
(2) Instrumentalities of interstate commerce
(3) Any behavior that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce (may be judged in the aggregate)
The test for assessing whether an activity in the aggregate effects interstate commerce is
rational basis (very deferential)
Note: limitations to commerce clause regard noneconomic intrastate activity
The Taxing Clause allows the federal government to
(1) Impose a tax even if doing so is done to regulate behavior (e.g. smoking tax)
Taxation need only be rationally related to raising money and can be imposed for any purpose