Conflict and Negotiation Flashcards

1
Q

Define conflict.

A

The process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that the first party cares about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two perspectives on conflict?

A

Interactionist view: The belief that conflict is…a positive
force in a group…and an absolute necessity for a group to perform effectively. There are two kinds of conflict functional and dysfunctional one helps the group the other does not.

Traditional view: the belief that all conflict is harmful and must be avoided.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the positive (3)and negative (6) outcomes of conflict?

A

Positive Outcome:
1. Better decision making.
* Tests logic of arguments.
* Questions assumptions.
* Generates creative thinking.
2. More responsive to the changing environment.
3. Stronger team cohesion (when conflict with outside opponents).

Negative Outcomes:
1. Lower performance.
2. Higher stress, dissatisfaction, turnover.
3. Less information sharing and coordination.
4. More organizational politics.
5. Wasted resources.
6. Weaker team cohesion (when conflict within team).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three things conflict can be about and explain each.

A

Task Conflict:
* Work content and goals
* Positive performance relationship at top management
level, with open & emotionally stable group members, and if degree of conflict considered moderate
* Alleviated by intervention of leaders

Relationship Conflict:
* Interpersonal relationships
* Studies indicate that almost always dysfunctional
* Alleviated by discovering commonalities

Process Conflict:
* How the work is done
* Can devolve into relationship conflict
* Alleviated by clarifying roles and unique value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the three ways conflict occurs:

A

Dyadic Conflict: conflict between 2 people

Intragroup conflict:
* Conflict within a group/team
* Focus of academic research
* Can be positive within supportive group climate

Intergroup Conflict: conflict between groups/teams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the five stages of the conflict process?

A

Stage 1: Potential opposition or incompatibility
Stage 2: Cognition or personalization
Stage 3: Intentions
Stage 4: Behaviour
Stage 5: Outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three conditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise (stage 1 conflict process)?

A

1) Communication breakdown
o Arise from communication barriers (e.g. noise)
o Also from too little or too much communication

2) Structural challenges
o Greater likelihood of conflict with larger groups, more
specialized activities, responsibility ambiguity, younger
members, higher turnover, reward disparity

3) Personal variables
o Greater likelihood of conflicts when values are opposed,
emotions are negative, or personality traits are disagreeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens at stage 2 of the conflict process and what are two outcomes?

A

o It’s the realization of Opposition or Incompatibility
o Parties make sense of conflict by defining it and its potential solutions
o Emotions play a major role in shaping perceptions

Felt Conflict: individuals emotionally involved; creates anxiety, tenseness, frustration, or hostility
Perceived Conflict: awareness by one party of the
existence of conditions of conflict; doesn’t mean it’s personalized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens at stage 3 of the conflict process

A

o Decisions to act in a given way
o Inferred (often erroneous) intentions may cause greater conflict
o Intentions can change during the course of the conflict
o Five conflict-handling intentions
o Individuals show preferences amongst these intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the five conflict handling styles and what conditions are each used?

A

Forcing/competing: high assertiveness, low cooperativeness
Avoiding: low assertiveness, low cooperativeness
Accommodating/ Yielding: low assertiveness, high cooperativeness
Problem-solving/ collaborating: high assertiveness, high cooperativeness
compromise: med. assertiveness, med. cooperativeness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

**Slides 12-17
Conflict Handling Styles

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are three avoidance behaviours?

A

Avoiding Action
Avoiding Blame
Avoiding Change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens at stage 4 of the conflict process?

A

o Conflict becomes visible
o Statements, actions and reactions made by the conflicting parties
o Overt behaviours may deviate from original intentions
o e.g. become more emotional or aggressive
o Dynamic process of interaction (action-reaction interplay)
o All conflict exists on an intensity continuum
o Dysfunction increases as progress upward
o Conflict management – the use of resolution and simulation techniques to achieve the desired level of conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Slide 20
Conflict intensity continuum

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

At stage 5 what are the two outcomes of the conflict process and what is the result? (5) (3)

A

Functional Outcomes or Conflict is Constructive when
* Improves decision quality
* Stimulates creativity & innovation
* Encourages interest & curiosity
* Problems are aired
* Accepts change & self-evaluation

Dysfunctional Outcomes or Conflict is Destructive when
* Group is less effective
* Reduces cohesiveness and communications
* Leads to the destruction of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the four steps to managing functional conflict?

A
  1. Recoginze a disagreement
  2. Open and Frank conversations
  3. Satisfy the top needs of each groups
  4. Emphasize shared interest
17
Q

Define negotiation and explain what it is.

A

A process in which two or more parties decide how to allocate scarce resources

  • Multiple parties trying to reach an agreement
  • When two or more conflicting parties attempt to resolve their divergent goals by redefining the terms of their interdependence
    -Process may include maintaining social relationships or behaving ethically in concert with achieving an outcome
17
Q

What are the two types of bargaining and how would start a negotion with each?

A

Distributive bargaining:negotiation that seeks to divide
up a fixed amount of resources creating “a win-lose situation”
o Use aggressive first offer as a bargaining strategies (Power & Anchoring)

Integrative bargaining: negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win-win solution
o Address needs and interests, not
positions & issues
o Invent options for mutual gain

18
Q

What bargaining characteristics are different from distributive to integrative bargaining? (6)

A

Goal
Motivation
Focus
Interest
Information Sharing
Duration of relationship

19
Q

Slide 26
Potential benefits of integrative bargaining

A
20
Q

What are three negotiation values and explain each?

A

Target Point
* the team’s realistic goal or expectation for a final
agreement
* should be realistic, based on available information
* what price would you like to sell/buy the item for?

Resistance Point
* the point beyond which the team will make no further
concessions
* the point at which you are indifferent to whether you
achieve a negotiated agreement or walk away
* beyond the resistance point, you prefer no agreement

Initial offer point
* the team’s opening offer to the other party

21
Q

Slide 28
Bargaining zone

A
22
Q

What is a positive bargaining zone?

A

o The bargaining zone (or zone of potential agreement) is defined as the space between the two parties’
reservation points

23
Q

Slide 32
Negative Bargaining zone

A
24
Q

What would be an example of a case with a high BATNA?

A

If it is a low cost to walk away from the negotiation, you have a high BATNA

24
Q

What BATNA stand for and what information does it give? (3)

A

Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement: Most favourable outcome that can be achieved if you walk away from a negotiation (the fallback alternative)

  • BATNA estimates your power in the negotiation
  • The BATNA serves to help you set the correct resistance point to use in bargaining
  • Knowing the value of your BATNA helps you protect your resistance point from influence by the other party
25
Q

Slides 34-35
BATNA example

A
26
Q

Slide 26
Anchoring reaction

A
27
Q

What are the 5 steps of the negotiation process?

A

Preparation & Planning
Definition of Ground rules
Clarification & Justification
Bargaining & Problem solving
Closure & implementation

28
Q

Slides 38-42
5 steps of negotiation

A
29
Q

Slides 43-44
Negotiation behaviours and considerations

A