Conflict of Interests Flashcards
What is informed consent?
means that the client agrees to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has sufficiently explained the material risks and reasonable alternatives.
The client must be given sufficient information by the lawyer and not simply rely on the advice of the lawyer. There is no requirement that the client must consult with a second, independent lawyer to provide informed consent
A lawyer must promptly inform a client of any
decision or circumstance that requires the client’s informed consent.
A conflict of interest arises when there is a
Significant risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client will be materially and adversely affected by the lawyer’s own interests or the lawyer’s duties to another current client, a former client, or a third person
The standard used to determine whether a conflict of interest is present is not
reasonable risk but rather substantial risk.
A conflict may arise from a lawyer’s duties not just to
current and former clients but also to third persons, such as fiduciary duties arising from a lawyer’s service as a trustee.
If an attorney mishandles a client conflict, she may be subject to
Disqualification as counsel, professional discipline, civil liability for legal malpractice.
criminal liability for legal malpractice not included
Generally, when a lawyer is barred from taking on a matter due to a conflict of interest, the other lawyers in her firm
are also barred from taking on the matter, unless the conflict is uniquely personal to that lawyer.
conflict is uniquely personal to that lawyer means?
or example, if the lawyer’s conflict of interest arose because of an improper personal relationship with the client, other lawyers in the firm would not have the conflict of interest imputed to them.
Despite a concurrent conflict of interest, a lawyer may represent a client as long as the representation is not prohibited by law and
1) Each affected client gives informed consent,
2) the representation does not involve asserting a claim by one client against the other in the same litigation, AND
3) the lawyer believes he can competently and diligently represent both clients despite the conflict.
a lawyer should not represent criminal co-defendants because
their interests are likely to be divergent, thus negatively affecting their Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. This may be true even if the co-defendants agree to the representation. However, the Rules of Professional Conduct do NOT expressly prohibit the representation of co-defendants in a criminal case. Generally, co-defendants’ interests are divergent, not similar.
IS there a conflict of interset? Sarah is an attorney who represents Defendant Daryl in a personal injury case. Daryl is also a named class member in a class action suit against John, and John is also Sarah’s client
Yes, because the person is “named”
IS there a conflict of interset? Sarah is an attorney who represents both Daryl and John. In Daryl’s case, she is arguing that ABC Act is unconstitutional. In John’s case in a different circuit, she is arguing that ABC Act is constitutional
No conflict. Permissible.
IS there a conflict of interset? Sarah is an attorney who represents Defendant Daryl in a wrongful death case. Daryl is also an unnamed class member in a class action suit against John, and John is also Sarah’s client
No conflict, because party is unnamed.
If two clients in a litigation or nonlitigation matter are represented by the same lawyer, and a potential conflict between the two ripens into a present conflict, their lawyer is required to:
(i) analyze the facts to determine if she can effectively represent both clients,
(ii) disclose the potential conflict to both clients,
(iii) invite them to give her informed consent, and
(iv) consider whether a reasonable lawyer would advise these clients to consent.
The same rules for handling this type of conflict apply to both litigation and nonlitigation matters
Note that the lawyer must withdraw from the joint representation if
a reasonable lawyer would have to advise either of the two clients not to consent. .
The lawyer may continue to represent one consenting client, but only if the client who is dropped gives
informed consent to the continuation, confirmed in writing.
In litigation between two people who were formerly joint clients of a single lawyer, who can claim the attorney-client privilege for their communications with that lawyer?
Neither of them
When a lawyer is taking on a new matter, if the lawyer’s interests are likely to Materially limit; her ability to represent a client effectively, she must
she must not take on the matter unless she obtains informed consent, confirmed in writing, from her client
Direct adversity exists when a lawyer
represents one client in a matter adverse to another current client, even where the lawyer represents the clients in unrelated matters. This is true in both litigation and transactional matters.
A lawyer must never be on opposite sides of the
same litigation (or other proceeding pending before a tribunal
If there is a conflict between current clients, a lawyer may undertake the representation if
she reasonably believes that she can competently and diligently represent each affected client despite the conflict, and each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. The clients’ signatures are not required.
Even with client consent, a lawyer must not
assert a claim on behalf of one client against another client represented by that lawyer in the same litigation (or other proceeding before a tribunal). In contrast, if the lawyer represents the second client in unrelated matters only, the conflict may be waivable.
In other words, the lawyer can’t be on both sides of the same proceeding
Lawyers within a firm are treated as
a single unit for conflicts purposes.
In class action litigation, the unnamed members of a class ordinarily are
not regarded as clients for purposes of the “direct adversity” conflicts rule. Therefore, a lawyer can sue an unnamed class member in an unrelated matter without obtaining their consent.