consequences of migration Flashcards
changes in the host country
- these large scale migrants also lead to significant cultural change in the host country, such as increased diversity of religious ideas
- eg, the british Indian Sikh community is now the largest Sikh community outside India
- gurdwara temples can be found in Cardiff and other major cities
- an exchange of ideas can also be seen in the impact young British asians have had on popular culture: london’s jay sean (who’s real name is kamaljiey singh shooti) has brought elements of south Asian music into British mainstream
high skilled workers
- the movement of smaller numbers of high skilled workers and high wealth individuals also has a significant effect for both source and host countries
- the variety of these elite-migrants (highly skilled and/or socially influential individuals) include: property developers, musicians, academics, computer programmers, health professionals and bankers
- their wealth derives from their profession or inherited assets
- some elite migrants live as ‘global citizens’ and have multiple homes in different countries
- most governments welcome highly skilled and extremely wealthy migrants
- skilled IT professionals from the USA, India and elsewhere work in the UK’s quaternary industry clusters in cities such as Bristol, London and Cambridge
migration flows that lead to interdependence
Russian migrant millionaires buying properties in London:
- during the early 2000s, Russian investment in London’s housing market helped push up property prices in fashionable districts such as Kensington
- property developers became very reliant on Russian money while homeowners throughout London enjoyed seeing their own house values increase
- in turn, London provided Russian oligarchs with a secure place to invest their cash
- thus, certain elements of UK and Russian society became economically interdependent
consequences of global movement
- fewer workers paying tax is an economic cost for the government of the source country (taxes fund the public sectors, eg health and education)
- increased pressure on schools brings a social cost for communities in the host country
- more people buying goods in shops is an economic benefit for the host country
- increased traffic congestion is an environmental cost for cities in the host country
- higher wages for workers due to undersupply of labour may be an economic benefit for communities in the source countries
- closing schools due to falling numbers is a social cost or communities in the source country (education allows for sustainable development)
- the introduction of rules to limit further immigration is a political change affecting the host country
- rising property prices due to high demand is an economic cost for home buyers in the host country (fosters a social divide and its a problem that takes a long time to fix)
- lower carbon emissions due to fewer people using local transport services is an environmental benefit for the government of the source country
remittances
- around US$500 billion of remittances are currently sent home by migrants annually, this is 3-4 times the value of overseas development aid
- 1in 9 people globally rely on remittance money to survive
- migrants send on average 15% of what they earn as a remittance
- around half the money goes to rural areas, where it is needed the most
- the UN estimates that remittances are 3x more important than international aid
- US$68.968 billion was sent to India in remittances in 2017
positive effects (reducing inequality and promoting growth) for the host regions
- fill particular skill shortages (eg Indian doctors arriving in the UK in the 1950s)
- economic migrants willingly do labouring work that locals may be reluctant to (eg Romanian fruit pickers on UK farms)
- working migrants spend their wages on rent, benefiting landlords and pay tax on legal earnings
- some migrants are ambitious entrepreneurs who establish new businesses employing others (in 2013, 14% of UK start up businesses were migrant owned)
negative effects (exacerbating inequality and promoting tension) for the host regions
- social tensions arise if citizens of the host country believe migration has led to a lack of jobs or affordable housing (a view adopted by some UK newspapers)
- local shortages of primary school places due to natural increase among a young migrant community (eg London boroughs that have become eastern European migration hotspots) and this places financial burden on local authorities
- employers may favour using migrants instead of native workers and working class communities may suffer unemployment as a result
positive effects for the source regions
- in time, migrants or their children may return, bringing new skills (young British Asians have relocated back to India to start health clubs and restaurant chains)
- in Bangladesh, the value of remittances exceeds foreign investment; unlike international aid and lending, remittances are peer to peer finance flow: money travels more or less directly from one family member to another; the money helps the social development of communities that have previously been excluded financially from access to education and healthcare
negatives effects for the source regions
- the economic loss of a generation of human resources, schooled at government expense, including key workers such as teachers and computer programmers (Poland has lost young people every year since the 1960s)
- the increased proportion of aged dependants creates a long term economic challenge
- there is reduced economic growth as consumption falls (especially urban services and entertainment for as young adult market: many nightclubs closed in Warsaw in 2004 when Poland joined the EU)
how migration can foster economic and social interdependency
- remittances sent home to a source country generate as much as 40% of GDP for some poorer states (eg Tajikistan), this can help pay for education and health
→ can lead to (vice versa), its a cycle - much needed migrant workers are often an essential part of some host country populations; they provide many vital economic and social services
(every country depends, to some extent on the economic health of others for its own continued wellbeing)
how migration can foster increased political and environmental interdependency
- in time, a closer political partnership may develop between states that have become socio-economically interdependent, such as EU states
→ can lead to and vice versa, its a cycle - this increases cooperation to tackle shared environmental threats, such as climate change; many European scientists have migrated to work in universities in other EU states
Indian workers moving to the UAE
(how migration and remittance flows create economic interdependency)
- over 2 million Indian migrants live United Arab Emirates, making up 30% of the total population
- many live in Abu Dhabi and Dubai
- an estimated US$15 billion is returned to India annually as remittances
- most migrants work in transport, construction and manufacturing industries
- around 1/5 are professionals working in service industries
Filipino workers moving to Saudi Arabia
(how migration and remittance flows create economic interdependency)
- around 1.5 million migrants from the Philippines have arrived on Saudi Arabia since 1973, when rising oil prices first began to bring enormous wealth to the country
- some work in construction and transport industries, others as doctors and nurses in Riyadh
- US$7 billion is returned to the Philippines annually as remittances
- reports of ill treatment of some migrants suggests there is a human cost to interdependency
examples of interdependency
- when large scale migrant labour flows become focused on core or hub regions, a process called backwash is said to be taking place, which can drain peripheral places of young workers
- the Schengen agreement has accelerated the backwash at an international level
- many economists believes backwash works in everyone’s interest because it provides EU governments with greater tax revenues to pay for road building projects, payments for farmers and grants for new businesses
- core periphery theorist John Freidmann said that backwash is balanced out by the trickle down of wealth to every country
- critics argue that backwash migration ‘losses’ for peripheral states in eastern European are really far greater than any trickle down gains they may
- in reality, its hard to either accept or reject the hypothesis because of the sheer complexity of the economic and demographic processes involved
benefits of interdependency
- can strengthen the friendship between states, reduces prospects for geopolitical conflict and deliver mutually shared growth and stability instead
- less conflict: the first steps towards the EU were taken shortly after the WW2 ended, European state governments believed that greater interdependency would end conflicts
- economics and politics working together: Friedman argued that economic and political interdependency are linked, in the golden arches theory of conflict prevention; two countries with McDonald’s restaurants would never wage war because their economies had become interlinked (the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine has weakened this theory but it remains an idea worth exploring)
- states that are home to a large diaspora population often have strong geopolitical ties: with the diaspora’s country of origin (eg the arrival of a large Korean diaspora population in the USA has deepened the country’s friendship with South Korea)
risks of interdependency
- the UK entered recession in 2009 during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), many building projects were cancelled and the knock on effect was that many migrants working in construction industries lost their jobs and stopped sending remittances home
- as a result, Estonia’s economy shrank by 13%
- many citizens view interdependency as a threat to their nation’s sovereignty, for the EU, the recent renewal of nationalism is linked with a broader debate about ‘loss of sovereignty’
- a large proportion of citizens in each EU country would like to end the freedom of movement brought by the Schengen Agreement as they believe too much in-migration has been allowed to take place (ethnicity/race conflict)
migration and economic inequalities
- the arrival of large numbers of low skilled workers in a country can result in sizable remittance flows directed towards the source country
- low waged international migrants are drawn towards global hubs in large numbers
- London, LA, Dubai and Riyadh are all home to large numbers of legal and illegal immigrants working for low pay in kitchens, on construction sites or as domestic cleaners
- migration flows can contribute to the increased interdependence of the countries which migrants are moving between
migration policies of host countries
- host countries differ greatly in terms of how liberal their international migration rules are
- laws governing economic migration vary over time in line with changes in workforce needs
- the UK government adopted a broadly ‘open door’ approach to international migration in the 1950s and again during the early 2000s
- both decisions related in part to skills and labour shortages arising during those periods
- few countries have laws preventing the out movement of people because this contravenes in the UDHR, article 13 states that everyone has the right to leave a country, including his own, and to return to his country
- as a result, almost all states are in theory, potential source countries for unlimited out migration
- one notable exception to this rule is North Korea, whose government requires that its citizens obtain an exit visa before being allowed to leave
- in the past, citizens of the Soviet Union faced similar restrictions on their freedom of movement
- in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, some foreign migrants must apply for an exit visa before being allowed to go home
rise in anti immigrant movements
- in some countries, anti globalisation political movements are increasingly popular with voters
- for many people, the growing rationale for retreating from globalisation is rooted in the valid concern that national cultural identity may be threatened
- migration creates political tensions because of differing perception of, and viewpoints on, the cultural changes it brings
- new political movements in the EU and USA share a common aim, which is to regain control of their borders
- there is a national philosophy that is relatively lacking in enthusiasm for multiculturalism and internationally minded politics
brexit - examples of anti immigration movements
- when a majority of UK voters chose to leave the EU in a referendum on membership in 2016, immigration was the most important issues influencing how people voted
- of London’s 8 million residents, 30% were born in another country
- some Londoners judge the scale and rat of cultural change to have been too great
- in many other EU states, nationalist parties now command significant support
- in the UK, this is UKIP and in France it is the national front, which has the support of 45% of working class voters
France (2015) - examples of anti immigration movements
- in France 2015, gunmen of Algerian descent killed staff of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo
- the magazine is well known for writing articles and creating cartoons mocking politics, the extreme right, culture and religion
- the murderers said their Islamic faith has been mocked
- extreme events such as these are still rare but demonstrate tensions in multicultural Europe that may ultimately threaten the survival of free movement of people
overpopulation - examples of anti immigration movements
- some groups are more against overpopulation than against immigration, but sometimes overpopulation is caused by immigration
- some people think there is a certain size of land needed to provide for a population (environmental space), eg to provide for the population’s consumption, including absorption of waste products
- immigrants, in theory, reduce the per capita size of land of the native country
- some are concerned about urban sprawl and congestion, alterations in the wildlife and natural environment of the state and an expansive carbon footprint due to immigration
- furthermore, some are concerned over a state’s scare resources, dwindling water reserves (eg California), energy and quality of soils
the USA
- the USA provides an example of how migration policies can change over time
- in the past, it was relatively easy for migrants to enter the country and gain US citizenship
- around 50 million people live in the USA currently who were not born there; over 200 million more are descendants of migrants
- recently, however the coveted US green card has been harder to gain
- the issue of illegal migration across the Mexican border is a major policy issue that divides the US public and politicians
- while in office, Obama called for work permits to be issued to many of the estimated 8 million unauthorised workers living in the USA
- in contrast, during his election campaign, Trump demanded that a wall be built along the Mexican border
economic migration issues that divide popular opinion in the US
- one view is that migrants are a vital part of the US economy’s growth engine
- from NYC restaurant kitchens to California’s vineyards, legal and illegal migrants work long hours for low pay
- however, high unemployment in some deindustrialised cities has led to calls for American jobs for American citizens