Contemporary Approaches Flashcards
(114 cards)
What happens in hypnosis session
Induction; 10 minutes
Suggestions; motor, challenge, cognitive
Measuring suggestibility
Old standards
- hypnotic suggestibility stable over time but does not correlate with major personality dimensions
- Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale
- Waterloo Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility
- Sussex Waterloo scale of hypnotisability
Methodology in hypnosis research
Orne 1959
Real simulator design
Simulators are low susceptibility subjects asked to fool hypnotist into believing they are highs
Simulator behaviour = demand characteristics
Are hypnotised subjects just lying?
Kinnunen 1994
- people give higher skin conductance responses when lying than telling truth
- experiememt: subject pick up object when asked if it was an apple they lie or tell truth, SCRs increased for both hypnotic and waking subjects when in critical condition
Real simulator design
genuineness of experience
Subjects asked about genuine of experience
89% responses for real
36% responses for simulators
-doesn’t mean all 89% telling truth
Are hypnotised subjects faking?
PET scan
Scanned brains of subjects hypnotically induced paralysis or faked paralysis
When asked to attempt to move PET scan show brain activity
-more activation in right orbitofrontal cortex
-less activation in left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
Are hypnotised subjects zombies
Crawford 1992
22 people interviewed after stage hypnosis show, 86% reported positive experiences and 36% reported being confused
23z believed hypnotists had full control
Will hypnotised subjects perform dangerous or anti social acts?
Orne and Evans 1965
-asked put hand in box of snakes or throw nitric acid in face of assistant, 5/6 did it
Coe 1973
-26 high subjects selected, told in future they’d be hypnotised, asked to sell heroin, drive to flat, say code word, deliver bags, collect $100
-given instructions under hypnosis or when awake, 9 subjects did the crime, 3/12 from hypnosis and 6/14 from non hypnosis group
-whether go through with crime or not depends on how act conflicts with moral values
Being active in successful hypnotic response
Experimental analysis technique (EAT)
After hypnosis watch the sessions back and provide commentary on what they experienced or thought
Subjects can be constructive
Hypnotised subjects not passive
Highly hypnotisable subjects can choose:
-how to respond to suggestions
-whether to change suggestions to suit them
-whether respond at all
-not all subjects realise they have this control
Common belief about hypnosis
hypnotised subject is in trance
-hypnotic induction produces an altered state of consciousness in which subjects are especially suggestible
hypnotic induction : meanings
- around for 200 ish years
- hypnosis is greek word for sleep
- conventional, traditional induction includes repeated suggestions about relax and sleep
responsiveness to suggestion
Braffman and Kirsch 1999
- without induction 2/7 suggestions passed
- with induction 3-7 suggestions passed
- induction doesn’t achieve much
stroop interference and hypnotic suggestion
Raz 2002
Raz 2006
-incongruent and neutral words
-hypnotic suggestion “foreign language that is meaningless”
-participants in control 110ms
-participants in suggestion 30ms, reduced stroop effect
2006:
-suggestion reduced stroop effect regardless if hypnotic or non-hypnotic
-hypnotic induction adds nothing to power of suggestion
traditional relaxation induction and effects
braffman and kirsch 1999
- increases suggestibility by small amount
- increase in response accompanied by greater expectation of responding
- IF its only expectation and belief thats responsible fro increase in suggestibility, anything can be induction if subject believes it
Banyai and Hilgard 1976
awake hypnosis
- “active alert induction”
- cycle on stationary bicycle, induction uses words like alert instead of sleepy
- no significant difference between traditional and active alert induction
- both scored 5/8
neurolinguistic programming - double induction
bandler and grindler
- claim double induction was “powerful and deepening technique”
- hand levitation induction in ear on contralateral side to dominant cerebral hemisphere, simultaneously hear grammatically childlike messages in other ear
- enables “direct communication to unconscious”
neurolinguistic programming
kirsch, mosher, matthews - double induction
lynn 1987 - indirect suggestions
- number of suggestions passed out of 12
- double induction not more significant than standard induction
-indirect inductions ad suggestions not more effective than traditional induction
effective inductions
glass and barber 1961
william james 1890
- sugar pill which subjects are told “induce hypnotic state” is as effective as standard hypnotic induction
- bright button, stroking the head, staring into eyes, drinking magnetised water
- induction is anything subject believes is an induction
markers of hypnotic state
- none yet detected
- brain isn’t in state like sleep
- no brainwaves special to hypnotic responding
- no patterns of activation revealed by brain imaging that is a marker of “hypnosis”
altered state
-states where people become more suggestible
-taking LSD, cannabis, alcohol
-subjects can and do feel they are in trance and report inward absorbed attention/relaxation
henry 1985
-subjective experience in hypnosis
-time going faster or slower
-external sounds clearer or muffled
matched subject preconceptions
kirsch 1992
was it relaxation or hypnotic induction?
- 24 hypnotisable subjects given hypnotic induction or progressive relaxation
- open ended reports about subjective state before and afetr responding to suggestion
- 13 state theorists and 9 non state theorists, 48% accuracy in classifying reports as following hypnotic or relaxation induction
history of hypnosis
- main phenomenon: spirit possession
- hysteria
- demonic possession
- animal magnetism
- modern times: hypnosis
- all have in common; suggestion and power of belief, altered sense of volition and perception of reality
hysteria
- psychological disorder characterised by physical symptoms without an organic cause
- conversion disorder or ‘somatic symptom disorder’
- symptoms: paralyses, blindness, deafness, convulsions
wandering womb theory of hysteria
- when not had a baby, womb moves around body restlessly causing symptoms of hysteria
- prayers can ‘calm’ the womb
- hard to distinguish between demonic possession and hysteria