Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

July 2021 Bar Exam > Contracts > Flashcards

Contracts Flashcards

1
Q

Contracts (Pneumonic) - Love For Dogs: Treat Every Rover Terrifically

A 
L - Law (what law applies)
F - Formation
D - Defenses
T - Terms 
E - Excuse for Non-Performance 
R - Remedies
T - Third-Party Problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Article 2 Applicability

A

Rule: Applies to sale of goods, goods are “moveable”, personal property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Common Law Applicability

A

Rule: Applies to all other contracts (outside of sale of goods)

i.e. services, construction, land sale, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contract

A

Rule: Legally enforceable promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Express Contract

A

Rule: Contract created by the parties’ words (oral or written)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Implied-In-Fact Contract

A

Rule: Contract created by their conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Restitution (Quasi-Contract)

A

Rule: Protects against unjust enrichment whenever contract law yields an unfair result
(remedy of last resort)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bilateral Contract

A

Rule: Offer than can be accepted in any reasonable method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Unilateral Contract

A

Rule: Offer can only be accepted by performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Offer

A

Rule: An offer is a (1) manifestation of an intention to be bound (as judged by a “reasonable person”/ objective standard) (2) communicated to an identified offeree with (3) definite and certain terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advertisement

A

Rule: Ads are not an offer unless there is a quantity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indefiniteness

A

Rule: If any of the terms are too indefinite, a contract cannot be enforced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indefiniteness - Open Price in Sale of Goods K

A

Rule: Courts will read in a “reasonable” price for sale of goods (but not in common law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Requirements Contracts

A

Rule: Even if quantity value is unknown, you may still contract to buy “all its requirements”

Exception: Must be reasonable, in line with prior demands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Termination (Step 2) and Methods

A

Rule: To end a contract prior to its full performance by either party

Methods

  1. Lapse of Time
  2. Revocation
  3. Rejection
  4. Death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Termination - Lapse of Time

A

Rule: An offer lapses after a stated term or after a reasonable time has passed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Termination - Revocation

A

An offeror terminates the offer

Rule: An offer can be revoked at any time prior to acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Direct Revocation

A

Rule: Offeror indicates directly to the offeree that he has changed his mind about entering the deal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Indirect Revocation

A

Rule: Offeror engages in conduct that indicates they’ve changed their mind and the offeree is aware of the conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When an Offer Cannot be Revoked

A
  1. Option
  2. Firm Offer (Article 2)
  3. Foreseeable Reliance Before vs After Acceptance
  4. Starting to Perform a Unilateral Contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Option - Irrevocable Offers

A

A promise to keep offer open that is paid for (consideration)

Note: An option contract is irrevocable for the time period stated, thus, not even buyer could revoke the offer within the specified time period (ex. by adding conditional terms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Merchant’s Firm Offer (Article 2) - Irrevocable Offers

A

Rule: Merchant’s firm offer arises when a merchant offers to buy or sell goods in a signed writing that gives assurances to keep an offer open, then the offer is irrevocable for a reasonable time (if time not specified, cannot be irrevocable for more than three months)

  • Must write in an offer to hold it open
  • Note: Only the OFFEROR must be a merchant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Foreseeable Reliance Before vs After Acceptance - Irrevocable Offers

A

Rule: If there is a reasonable showing of reliance on the contract, then the offer is irrevocable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Starting to Perform a Unilateral Contract - Irrevocable Offers

A

Rule: In unilateral contracts, once performance has begun, offers cannot be revoked
(Note: Mere preparation to perform is not the start of performance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Timing of Revocation

A

Rule: A revocation is effective on receipt (No Mailbox Rule)

Note: A written revocation of an offer is effective when it is received by the offeree, under common law, it is “received” as soon as it comes into the physical possession of the person addressed (or someone authorized to receive it, or when deposited in some place authorized for this or similar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Rejection of Offers

A

Rule: An offer terminates when the offeree rejects it (an “inappropriate response”)

Note: counteroffers, conditional acceptances, additional terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Counteroffers - Rejection

A

Rule: Counteroffers operate as rejections, but “mere bargaining” does not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Conditional Acceptance - Rejection

A

Rule: Conditional acceptances operate as a rejection and counteroffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Conditional Acceptance (Acceptance Adding Terms/ Varying Offer: Common Law) - Rejection

A

Common Law Rule: Acceptance must mirror the offer “Mirror Image Rule”

If the offeree adds terms, it is a rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Mirror Image Rule

A

Rule: Under Common Law, acceptance must mirror the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Conditional Acceptance (Acceptance Adding Terms/ Varying Offer: Article 2) - Rejection

A

Rule: The offeree’s adding or changing a term does not prevent acceptance under Article 2

Exception: (included only if)

  • Both parties are merchants
  • Not a material change
  • No objection to it within a reasonable time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Material Change (Article 2)

A

Contract term that would likely cause hardship or surprise

Exception: If the term is in the industry, it’s not material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Death - Termination of Offers

A

Rule: Death of either party before acceptance terminates a revocable offer

Note: Death does not automatically terminate a contract or an irrevocable offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Acceptance (Step 3)

A

Rule: Assent to the terms of an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Language of Offer - Acceptance

A

Rule: Language of the offer may control the manner of acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Starting Performance as Acceptance: Bilateral Contract

A

Rule: Starting performance is acceptance and carries with is an implied promise to finish the job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Unilateral Contract Signal

A

Signal: Offer “only by”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Starting Performance as Acceptance: Unilateral Contract

A

Rule: Starting performance is NOT acceptance and only completing performance is acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Improper Performance as Acceptance

A

Rule: Improper performance is simultaneous acceptance and breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Silence as Acceptance

A

Rule: Generally, silence is NOT acceptance

Exception: Custom creates duty to speak (i.e. you never said anything about not accepting/ accepting)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Accommodation (Common Law)

A

Rule: Notice to buyer that seller does not have conforming goods, buyer has a choice to accept or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Timing of an Acceptance

A

Rule: Generally, acceptance is effective when mailed (Mailbox Rule)

Policy: Protects the offeree against revocation once they have mailed an acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Acceptance vs Revocation and the Mailbox Rule

A

Acceptance is effective WHEN MAILED

Revocation is effective on RECEIPT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Exceptions to Mailbox Rule

A
  1. Offer States Otherwise
  2. Irrevocable Offer - No MB Protection
  3. Rejection Sent First, then Acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Offer States Otherwise -Exceptions to Mailbox Rule

A

If offer states specific acceptance terms, then MB rule not valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Irrevocable Offer: No MB Protection - Exceptions to Mailbox Rule

A

If irrevocable K: If acceptance is RECEIVED after irrevocable term, acceptance by MB rule is NOT valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Rejection Sent First, then Acceptance - Exceptions to Mailbox Rule

A

If rejection is sent first, then original offer is void, and a contract does not exist. Whichever is received first controls. If acceptance received first, then accepted.

MB rule invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Consideration

A

“Bargained-for legal detriment/ benefit”

Can be (1) a promise in exchange for a promise, or (2) promise for performance, or (3) promise for forbearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Past Consideration

A

Rule: Past consideration is NOT consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Forbearance

A

Consideration can also occur for NOT/ refraining from doing certain things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Adequacy of Consideration

A

Rule: Adequacy of consideration is irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Contract Modification: Is there Consideration to Enforce the Modification

A

Under Common Law: New consideration is required to modify a contract, performing a preexisting duty is not enough

Exception: If third-party comes in, then is enforceable

Under Article 2: Consideration is NOT required to modify a contract for the sale of goods, but must have Good Faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Pre-Existing Duty Rule

A

Rule: Under Common Law, new consideration is required to modify a contract, performing a preexisting duty is not enough

i.e. Someone asking for more money to do same thing they originally promised to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Partial Payment of a Debt that is Due and Undisputed - Exception to the Consideration Rule

A

Rule: If there is partial payment of a debt that is due and undisputed, there is no consideration and it will not be enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Time-Barred Debt as an Exception to the Consideration Rule

A

Rule: Written promise to pay a debt, collection of which is barred by the SOL, is enforceable, even without consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Promissory Estoppel as a Substitute for Consideration - Exception to the Consideration Rule

A

Rule: Foreseeable reliance may make a promise enforceable, even without consideration

(i) promise made
(ii) reasonable foreseeable detrimental reliance
(iii) justice requires enforcement

Note: Promissory Estoppel is the right answer only if there is NO consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Capacity (Lack Of) - Defenses

A

(a) Minors (under 18)
(b) Intoxicated
(c) Mentally Incompetent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Lack of Capacity Rule

A

Rule: An incapacitated defendant has the RIGHT to disaffirm the contract (does not have to)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Implied Affirmation After Gaining Capacity

A

Tip: Look for minor retaining the benefit under the contract after reaching 18 yrs old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Exception to Incapacity Defense

A

Rule: An incapacitated party is liable for necessaries (food, shelter, clothing, medical care), but only for their reasonable value, not the contract price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

Defense: Ambiguity/ Misunderstanding

A

Rule: A contract will not be enforced if there is Material Ambiguity to the terms of the contract

Note: only if neither parties know or should have known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Defense: Mistake - Mutual Mistake About a Material Fact

A

Look to see if bargained for subject matter actually exists (i.e. fundamental mistake that would materially alter the contract)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Defense: Mistake - Unilateral Mistake

A

Rule: When only one party makes mistake, contract is still enforceable

Exception: Unless the mistake is obvious or palpable
- Other party knows or should have known of other parties mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Defense: Unconscionability

A

Rule: Under this doctrine, courts are empowered to refuse to enforce all or part of a contract

Two Tests:
(1) Unfair Surprise and Oppressive Terms - tested as of the time the agreement was made, by the court

Note: Now applicable to all contracts laws generally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Defense: Duress (Generally)

A

An actual or a threatened violence or restraint of a man’s person, contrary to law, to compel him to enter into a contract, or to discharge one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Defense: Duress (Elements)

A

(1) Bad guy - makes an improper threat

(2) Vulnerable Guy - no reasonable alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds** - When is a Writing Required

A

General: Most oral contracts are enforceable, but only certain kinds of contracts need a writing to be enforced (that fall within SOF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds (Categories Pneumonic)

A

MY LEGS

M - Marriage 
Y - Year 
L - Land Sale
E - Executor 
G - Goods ($500+)
S - Surety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Marriage

A

Rule: Contracts in consideration of marriage are subject to SOF (i.e. pre-nup)

Exception: Cannot be solely a PROMISE to marry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Year

A

Rule: Contracts which cannot possibly be completed in one year or less are subject to SOF (watch for dates)

Exception: Lifetime deals are not subject to the SOF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Land Sale/ Transfer of an Interest in Real Property (Mortgage Contract)

A

Rule: Generally, Land Sales and Transfers of an Interest in Real Property are subject to the SOF

Note: the contract need only reasonably describe the subject matter; great specificity, such as a legal description, is not required

Note: Most transfers of interest in land over one year are subject to SOF (i.e. 2-year lease)

Note: Construction contracts not subject to SOF (i.e. building a fence on property)

Note: Equal Dignity Rule - Authorization by agent must be in writing, only if underlying deal is subject to SOF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Executor

A

Rule: Promises by executor of an estate to pay the estate’s debts from some other source of funds/ out of his own pickets, then are subject to SOF (not likely tested)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Goods ($500+)

A

Rule: Under Article 2, the sale of goods $500 or more are subject to the SOF

Note: Does not have to be more than $500

Note: All sales of goods, even under $500, are still subject to Article 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Defense: Statute of Frauds Categories - Surety

A

A promise to “answer for” (guarantee) the debt of another person

Exception: A mere promise to pay money is not a surety

Note: Usually wrong answer when on the exam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

Contract Modification & Interaction with SOF

A

Rule: The modification must be in writing ONLY IF the contract as modified (not the original contract) is within the SOF

Exception: Contracts may write in terms that prohibit oral modification

Note: Under common law, oral modifications are not enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

SOF - What is an Adequate Writing

A

Note: Depends on nature of writing

Article 2 Sale of Goods:
(1) Must contain a quantity and (2) be signed by the party to be charged with breach

Common Law: Writing must have (1) all “material” terms and (2) be signed by the D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds (i.e. Where a Writing is NOT Needed)

A

Rule: These exceptions to SOF are carved out where there is less chance of fraud

1) Land Sale/ Real Property Exceptions
2) Full Performance of Service K Satisfies SOF, but Part Performance Does Not
3) Sale of Goods for $500 or More (Article 2 SOF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds - Land Sale/ Real Property Exceptions

A

a. Leases of One Year or Less: Legislative exception to protect tenants

b. “Part Performance” of Real Estate K (need TWO of three)
(i) some payment
(ii) possession
(iii) improvements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds - Full Performance of Service K Satisfies SOF, but Part Performance Does Not

A

Rule: Writing not needed to satisfy SOF if full performance of the contract has occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds - Sale of Goods for $500 or More (Article 2 SOF)

A

Rule: In conditions of an oral agreement, ____ is not subject to the SOF

a. Goods Accepted or Paid for by Buyer

b. Custom-Made Goods
Need to show a “Substantial beginning” to satisfy
SOF—i.e., that the goods are custom-made/not suitable for sale to others

c. Judicial Admission—Satisfies SOF
If a defendant admits under oath that they had a deal,
then will lose their SOF defense

d. Merchants’ Confirmatory Memo***
One party can use its own signed writing to satisfy
the SOF against the other party if:
(i) Both parties are merchants;
(ii) Writing claims agreement & has quantity;
and
(iii) There is no written objection within 10 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds - Suretyship

A

Note: The “Main Purpose” Exception takes us outside the SOF

Rule: If the sureties main purpose of the promise is to benefit ones’s self, then the SOF can be enforced against the party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

Battle of the Forms

A

Rule: Battle of the Forms provides that the proposal of additional or different terms by the offeree in a definite and timely acceptance is effective as an acceptance.

  • It lists specific rules for determining what terms are included in a contract when the terms of acceptance do not match the terms of the offer

Exception: Unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms

Note: Whether the additional or different terms become part of the contract depends on whether or not both parties are merchants (and if it materially alters the contract). If any party to the contract is not a merchant, the additional or different terms are considered to be mere proposals to modify the contract, and they do not become part of the contract unless the offeror expressly agrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

Knockout Rule - Conflicting Terms

A

Rule: Between merchants, some courts will apply the knockout rule when different terms are included (i.e., conflicting terms are knocked out and replaced by gap-filling terms under the UCC)

84
Q

UCC Language on Additional Contract Terms Between Merchants

A

Rule: Under the UCC, if both parties to a contract are merchants, additional terms in an acceptance will be included in the contract unless (i) they materially alter the original contract; (ii) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; or (iii) the offeror has already objected to the particular terms, or objects within a reasonable time after notice of them is received

85
Q

Timing of Rejection

A

Rule: Rejections are effective when received

Exception: Mailbox Rule (note MB rule does not apply if offeree sends a rejection, followed by an acceptance and rejection received first)

86
Q

Simultaneous Acceptance and Revocation

A

Rule: If simultaneous acceptance and revocation of an offer occurs, the outcome would turn on the court’s determination as to whether revocation letter had been received before or after the letter of acceptance was subject to the MB rule

87
Q

Options Contracts and the MB Rule

A

Rule: The mailbox rule does not apply to option contracts, and the acceptance under an option contract is effective only upon receipt

88
Q

Revocation

A

Rule: Words or conduct of the offeror terminating the offer

89
Q

Rejection

A

Rule: Words or conduct of the offeree rejecting the offer

90
Q

Termination by Operation of Law

A

1) Destruction of subject matter of the contract
2) Supervening illegality of subject matter of contract
3) Death or insanity of either party

91
Q

Parol Evidence Rule - Generally

A

When parties intend that a writing is the final expression of their bargain, no prior (oral or written) or contemporaneous (oral) expressions are admissible to vary the terms of the writing

92
Q

Gap-Fillers: Article 2

A 
Rule: If missing, Article 2 provides: price (reasonable at time of delivery), place of delivery
(seller’s business), time of shipment (reasonable), time for payment (receipt of goods),
and assortment (buyer’s option)
93
Q

Breach of Contract - Perfect Tender Rule (UCC Article 2)

A

Rule: Under the UCC, if goods or delivery fail to conform to contract in any way, buyer generally may reject all, accept all, or accept any commercial units and reject rest

94
Q

Breach of Contract - Minor Breach (Common Law)

A

Rule: Minor breach occurs when obligee gains the substantial benefit of bargain so aggrieved party must perform, but right to damages

95
Q

Breach of Contract - Material Breach (Common Law)

A

Rule: Material breach occurs when obligee does not gain substantial benefit of bargain so no duty to
perform, immediate right to damages and other remedies

96
Q

Remedies - Specific Performance

A

Rule: If legal remedy (damages) is inadequate, court may order breaching party to perform (land and rare or unique goods)

97
Q

Remedies - Damages (General)

A

Rule: Damages can be recovered only to the extent they can be proved with reasonable certainty and could not be avoided with reasonable effort

98
Q

Reformation

A

Rule: Reformation occurs when a writing changed to conform to parties’ original intent if mutual mistake,
unilateral mistake and party knows of it and does not disclose, or misrepresentation

99
Q

Rule of Contract Construction

A

Rule: Contracts are construed as a whole, words are generally given their
ordinary meaning, written or typed terms prevail over printed, custom and usage in
business and locale is considered, court will try to find contract valid, and ambiguities are
construed against the contract’s preparer

100
Q

Parol Evidence Rule - Integration

A

Rule: Integration—final and complete expression

a. If incomplete (partial integration), evidence admitted to supplement

b. Merger clause (states agreement is complete on its face) is evidence of full
integration

101
Q

Parol Evidence Rule - Evidence Outside Scope of the Rule May Be Admitted

A

Acceptable Evidence:

a. Evidence concerning validity (e.g., formation defects, conditions precedent)
b. Evidence used to interpret (words used are uncertain or ambiguous)
c. Evidence showing true consideration paid
d. Evidence in action for reformation

102
Q

Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule

A

1) Correct a Clerical Error (e.g., a typo)
2) Establish a Defense Against Formation
3) Interpret a Vague or Ambiguous Term—Parol Evidence
Is Okay
4) Add to a Partially Integrated Writing—Parol Evidence Is
Okay
Partial integration = A final statement of the terms
included, but not a complete statement of all terms
agreed to

103
Q

Parol Evidence Rule (P.E.R.)

A

Rule: Keeps out evidence of a prior or contemporaneous
agreement (either oral or written) that contradicts a
later writing

104
Q

Parol Evidence Rule (P.E.R.) - Later Events

A

Rule: The Parol Evidence Rule is irrelevant. Parole evidence rule only looks at events that happened prior to the final writing
(if after, modification)

105
Q

Conduct as Source of K Terms - Course of Performance

A

Rule: How parties performed under previous installments of this contract. Course of performance is the best evidence of what
the parties intended.

106
Q

Conduct as Source of K Terms - Course of Dealing

A

Rule: What parties did under prior contracts with each other.

107
Q

Conduct as Source of K Terms - Usage of Trade

A

Rule: What others in the trade do in similar contracts (less important than #1 and #2).

108
Q

Seller’s Warranties of Quality

in a Sale of Goods (Article 2) - Express Warranty

A

Rule: Describe the goods, promise facts about the goods, showing a sample or model, but NOT an “opinion.”

109
Q

Seller’s Warranties of Quality

in a Sale of Goods (Article 2) - Implied Warranties

A
  1. Implied Warranty of Merchantability
110
Q

Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A

Rule: The goods are fit for their ordinary purpose.

Key Fact: Seller is a merchant who deals in goods of the kind

111
Q

Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose

A

Rule: The goods are fit for buyer’s particular purpose.

Key Facts: (1) Seller knows buyer has a special purpose and (2) is relying on seller to select suitable goods

Note: Seller does not have to be any kind of a merchant at all

112
Q

Limitations on Liability in a Sale of Goods - Disclaimers

A

Rule: A seller can disclaim implied warranties, but not express warranties.

113
Q

Limitations on Liability in a Sale of Goods - Disclaimers (Magical Words of Article 2)

A

Rule: If using “as is” or “with all faults” to disclaim, may also expressly and outright as long as the language is conspicuous

114
Q

Limitation on Buyer’s Remedies

A

General Rule: Seller can limit buyer’s remedies for breach of any warranty (express or implied) as long as the limitation is not unconscionable

Exception: Limiting buyer’s remedies for personal injury in the case of consumer goods is presumed to be unconscionable

115
Q

Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods - (When goods are damaged before buyer gets them and neither buyer nor seller is to blame, who bears the
Risk of Loss): If Seller Bears Risk

A

Rule: Seller must provide new goods to buyer for no additional cost, or be liable for breach

116
Q

Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods - (When goods are damaged before buyer gets them and neither buyer nor seller is to blame, who bears the Risk of Loss): If Buyer Bears Risk

A

Rule: Buyer must still pay the contract price even though

goods are destroyed

117
Q

Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods - Hierarchy

A
  1. Agreement Allocates Risk: The agreement of the parties controls
  2. Breach: Breaching party bears Risk
  3. Delivery by Common Carrier**: Risk of Loss shifts to buyer when seller completes its “delivery obligations.”
    4: Non-Carrier Cases: Risk of Loss depends on whether the seller is a merchant.
118
Q

Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods: Delivery by Common Carrier

A

Possibility 1: Shipment Contract** - Seller must get the goods to a common carrier, make delivery arrangements, and notify buyer

Note: F.O.B. followed by seller address= free on board, Shipment Contract

Possibility 2: Destination Contract - Seller must get the goods all the way to a specific destination (usually, where buyer is located)

119
Q

Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods: Non-Carrier Cases

A

Risk of Loss depends on whether the seller is a merchant

(1) Merchant-Seller: Seller bears Risk of Loss until buyer takes possession of the goods.

(2) Non-Merchant-Seller
Risk of Loss Passes Sooner: Buyer bears Risk of Loss
once seller “tenders” the goods (makes them available to buyer)

120
Q

Performance of Common Law Contracts

A

Rule: Performance does not have to be perfect, can be substantial performance

121
Q

Performance of Common Law Contracts: Substantial Performance

A

Rule: Substantial performance is all that is required [i.e., a
party cannot commit a material breach]

122
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods (Article 2)

A
  1. Perfect Tender Rule
  2. Option to Cure (“Second Chance”)
  3. Installment Contracts
  4. Buyer’s Acceptance of Goods
  5. Buyer’s Revocation of Acceptance of the
    Goods
  6. Consequences of Rejection/Revocation of
    Acceptance
  7. Buyer’s Obligation to Pay
123
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Perfect Tender Rule

A

Rule: Seller must deliver perfect goods in the right place at
the right time.
If tender is not 100% perfect, buyer has the right to
reject the goods

124
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Option to Cure

A

Rule: A seller who fails to make perfect tender may have an option to cure.

Whether seller has that option usually depends on
whether the time for performance has expired

a. Time Has Not Expired
Seller has the option to cure

b. Time Has Expired
Seller does not have an option to cure unless there is
“reasonable grounds” for thinking that her improper
tender would have been acceptable

125
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Installment Contracts = Substantial Impairment Rule

A

General: Installment contracts requires or authorizes seller to deliver in separate installments (otherwise, seller must deliver the goods in a single delivery)

Rejection Under Installment K: Perfect Tender Rule does NOT apply to installment contracts, so it’s harder for buyer to reject. Buyer may reject only for substantial impairment

126
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Buyer’s Acceptance of Goods

A

Implied Acceptance**: Buyer keeps goods after having an opportunity to inspect them

Consequences of Buyer’s Acceptance: Once buyer accepts (even if by passage of time), it’s too late for buyer to reject, but buyer can still get damages for seller’s breach

127
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Buyer’s Revocation of Acceptance of the Goods

A

General Rule: A buyer cannot revoke acceptance of goods.

Exception: (1) If the non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the goods (2) and was difficult to discover (i.e., it was a latent defect)

128
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Consequences of Rejection/Revocation of
Acceptance

A
  • Return: Buyer can return the goods at seller’s expense.
  • Refund: Buyer can get back any money buyer has paid.
  • Damages: Buyer can get damages for breach of contract
129
Q

Performance of Contracts for a Sale of Goods: Buyer’s Obligation to Pay

A

Rule: Cash unless otherwise agreed

Note: A check is okay, but seller can refuse it. But that gives buyer an additional reasonable time to come in with the cash

130
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Other Party’s Breach

A

Rule: May provide an excuse depending on the nature of

the contract

131
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Other Party’s Breach: Sale of Goods (Article 2)

A

Rule: If seller’s performance is not perfect in every respect [“Perfect Tender Rule”], buyer has pretty much free reign.

3 options:

1) reject all,
2) accept all, or
3) reject some and accept the rest

Note: Buyer can still get damages

132
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Other Party’s Breach: Common Law Contracts

A
  • Damages Rule: Injured party can recover damages for any breach of contract, whether the breach is material or not
  • Excuse Rule: Only a material breach provides an excuse to suspend innocent party’s performance

Note: If benefit is conferred, breaching party may still receive restitution

Note: Divisible Contract: K able to be broken down (i.e. paid $250 for each room painted)

133
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Anticipatory Repudiation

A

Rule: Anticipatory Repudiation provides an excuse, unless the repudiation is retracted

Note: Repudiation can be retracted so long as they have not been relied upon yet

134
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Failure to Give Adequate Assurance (Article 2)

A

Rule: A party with reasonable grounds for being insecure about the other party’s performance may, IN WRITING, request adequate assurance that the other party will perform in accordance with the contract

Note: cannot rewrite deal or request specific type of assurance

135
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Later Agreements Excusing Original Obligations

A
  1. Rescission
  2. Modification
  3. Accord/ Satisfaction
  4. Novation
136
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Later Agreements Excusing Original Obligations - Rescission

A

Rule: Rescission is a mutual agreement to cancel the contract

  • Rescission occurs when (1) contract voidable/rescinded if mutual mistake of material fact,
    (2) unilateral mistake that other party knew or should have known or extreme hardship,
    (3) misrepresentation of material factor, or
    (4) duress, undue influence, illegality, incapacity, or failure
    of consideration
137
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Later Agreements Excusing Original Obligations - Modification

A

Rule: A modification is an agreement to replace an existing contract with a
new one.

A modification takes effect immediately (i.e., excuses original obligations immediately).

138
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Later Agreements Excusing Original Obligations - Accord/ Satisfaction

A

Rule: An accord is an agreement to accept a different performance in future satisfaction of an existing duty.

  • The duty is suspended by the accord, but is not excused until the accord is satisfied (performed)

Exam Tip: Whether you have a modification or an accord and satisfaction depends on the timing—is the underlying
obligation excused right now (modification) or only later on (accord/ satisfaction)

139
Q

Excuse for Non-Performance: Later Agreements Excusing Original Obligations - Novation

A

Rule: A novation is an agreement to substitute a new party for an existing
one.

Note: Everyone must be aware of the substitution or it is a delegation (delegation does not excuse contracting party’s liability)

140
Q

Impossibility as an Excuse

A

Rule: Under common law, impossibility is a later unforeseen event that makes performance impossible may provide seller with an excuse for breach.

Under Article 2, the doctrine is called impracticability

141
Q

Impossibility as an Excuse: Destruction of Something Necessary for Performance

A

Rule: Under the Common Law, destruction of subject matter of K provides an excuse for non-performance

Rule: Under Article 2, destruction of subject matter of K provides an excuse for nonperformance BUT:
- Risk of Loss - A seller who bore risk of loss when goods were damaged or destroyed is excused by impracticability

  • Unidentified Goods - Seller is excused only if the goods that were damaged or destroyed had been “identified to the contract” i.e. set aside for sale to the buyer
142
Q

Impossibility as an Excuse: Death/Incapacity of Essential Person as an Excuse

A

Rule: Not just any person; must be someone special/ essential for performance

143
Q

Impossibility as an Excuse: Supervening Governmental Regulation

A

Rule: New laws or regulations passed that make performance of the contract illegal or impossible

144
Q

Impossibility as an Excuse: Increase in the Cost of Seller’s Performance =
NO Excuse

A

Rule: In cases where the cost of seller’s performance increases, this is not an excuse

145
Q

Frustration of Buyer’s Primary Purpose

A

Rule: If the essential purpose of the contract is undermined and BOTH parties were aware of the intended use, then it is excused

146
Q

Failure of an Express Condition

A

Rule: Failure of an express condition unsatisfied is an excuse to contract (express must be STRICTLY/ PERFECTLY satisfied/ complied with
- Language in a K - Limits obligations created by other
contract language, but does not create an independent obligation
- Note: Express conditions do not create obligations

Note: Look for words like “if,” “as long as,” “when,” “provided that,” “on condition that” and “unless.”

147
Q

Failure of an Express Condition: Satisfaction Clauses

A

Rule: “Satisfaction” is measured by a reasonable person standard unless the contract deals with art or matters of personal taste (where buyer must be satisfied)

148
Q

Types of Express Conditions

A
  1. Condition Precedent**: Rule - An event that must occur before performance is due
  2. Condition Subsequent: Rule - An event that cuts off an existing duty
149
Q

Excusing a Condition

A

Rule: Occurrence of a condition may be excused by the later action or inaction of the person protected by the
condition

  1. Failure to Cooperate - Failing to cooperate excuses the condition and can no longer rely on the protection
  2. Waiver - Waiver is voluntarily giving up protection
    Note: can retract waiver for future payments if not relied upon yet
150
Q

Non-Monetary Remedies

A
  1. Specific Performance

2. Unpaid Seller’s Right to Reclaim Goods (Article 2)

151
Q

Non-Monetary Remedies: Specific Performance

A

Rule: SP is an equitable remedy, available only if monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the injured party.
Availability of specific performance depends on the nature of the contract -
1) land
2) goods
3) services

152
Q

Specific Performance: Real Property/Land Sale

A

Rule: Specific performance is generally available because real property is considered unique (even if it’s boring land)

Note: All** land is unique

153
Q

Specific Performance: Sale of Goods (Article 2)

A

Rule: Under Article 2, specific performance is available only if the goods are unique or there are “other proper circumstances”

154
Q

Specific Performance: Personal Service Contracts

A

Rule: Specific performance is not available in service contracts, but injunctive relief may be

155
Q

Non-Monetary Remedies: Unpaid Seller’s Right to Reclaim Goods (Article 2)

A

General Rule: Not available under Article 2

Note: Seller may have rights under bankruptcy law

Exceptions:
(1) If buyer was insolvent when it received the goods
and seller makes a demand within 10 days after buyer received them
(2) Seller can reclaim goods at any time if buyer misrepresented its solvency to seller in writing within three months before delivery

Note: Buyer still has to have the goods at point of reclamation

156
Q

Monetary Remedies

A
  1. Expectation Damages
157
Q

Monetary Remedies - Expectation Damages

A

Rule: Put an injured party in as good a position as full performance, “compensating” for lost expectation.

Note: Expectation damages are the general rule

158
Q

Monetary Remedies -

Common Law Expectation Damages

A

Rule: Under the common law, measured by the value of the contract had it been performed

Reliance: Return to pre-contract status-quo (not expected profit, but make no worse off)

Restitution: Measured by the value of the benefit conferred

159
Q

Monetary Remedies -

Article 2 Expectation Damages

A

Rule: Under Article 2, awards expectation damages

160
Q

Monetary Remedies -

Article 2 Expectation Damages: Buyer’s Damages if Seller Breaches (Three Options)

A
  1. Cover Damages: Cover Price Minus Original Contract Price, used if buyer covers in good faith [this is the usual measure]
  2. Market Damages: Market Price Minus Contract Price,
    used if buyer doesn’t cover in good faith or doesn’t
    cover at all
  3. Loss in Value: Value as Promised Minus Value as
    Delivered is used if buyer keeps non-conforming goods
161
Q

Monetary Remedies -

Article 2 Expectation Damages: Seller’s Damages if Buyer Breaches (Four Options)

A
  1. Resale Damages: Contract Price Minus Resale Price, used assuming seller resells in good faith [usual measure]
  2. Market Damages: Contract Price Minus Market Price, used if seller does not resell in good faith or does not resell at all
  3. Contract Price: If Seller Cannot Resell the Goods
  4. Lost Profit: If Seller Is a Lost Volume Dealer***
162
Q

Monetary Remedies - Punitive Damages

A

Rule: Punitive damages are not available. Punitive damages are NOT awarded for breach of contract because the purpose of contract damages is to
compensate, not punish

163
Q

Monetary Remedies - Liquidated Damages Clause

A

Rule: Liquidated damages are upheld if damages:

1) Were difficult to estimate at the time of the contract, and
2) Are a reasonable forecast of probable damages, BUT

3) Cannot operate as a “penalty”

Note: Lump sum damages are not likely enforceable, throw it out as punitive, note, can still be awarded expectation damages, or reliance (don’t give aggrieved nothing)

164
Q

Monetary Remedies - Incidental Damages

A

Rule: Incidental damages are always recoverable, and are costs to the injured buyer or seller of transporting/
caring for goods after a breach and of arranging a
substitute transaction. These are always recoverable

Note: Does NOT have to be foreseeable, not a part of the rule

165
Q

Monetary Remedies - Consequential Damages

A

Rule: Consequential damages must be reasonably foreseeable to the breaching party at the time the contract is formed
(=indirect results from breach)

Note: Reasonably foreseeable applies here, and not to incidental

Note: Unavailable to seller’s under Article 2

Note: Chatty rule, show foreseeable at the time of formation (tell seller what you’ll be missing out on)

166
Q

Monetary Remedies - Avoidable Damages (Duty to Mitigate)

A

Rule: Avoidable Damages occur when an injured party cannot recover damages he could have avoided (“mitigated”) with reasonable effort

Note: Subtract this value

167
Q

Third-Party Issues - Entrustment (Article 2)

A

Rule: An owner who entrusts goods to a merchant who
deals in goods of the kind (i.e., a dealer) has no rights
against a bona fide purchaser (BFP)

Note: On bar exam, BFP often wins

168
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary

A

General Rule: Two people enter a contract intending to benefit a third-party, third-party can sue

169
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary: Intended Beneficiary

A

Rule: IB (usually named in contract), is a person who is not party to a contract, but has rights under the contract because it was intended to benefit

170
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary: Promisor

A

Rule: Promisor is the party who promises to perform for the third-party

171
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary: Promisee

A

Rule: Promisee is the party who secures the promise

172
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary: Promisor’s Liability To the Third-Party Beneficiary

A

Rule: Promisor only has liability to intended beneficiary who has the right to enforce the contract (not incidentals)

173
Q

Third-Party Issues - Third-Party Beneficiary: Promisor’s Liability To the Promisee

A

Rule: Promisor has liability to the Promisee

174
Q

Third-Party Issues - Rescission and Modification of Third Party Deals

A

General Rule: The promisor and promisee can rescind or modify the
contract until the rights of the 3rd party have “vested.”

If Reliance Occurs: Rights vest and cannot cancel without consent unless contract otherwise provides

Exception: Contrary language in the contract controls

175
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment of Rights to a Third Party (Generally)

A

Definition: Two people make a contract; later, one (assignor) transfers his rights to a third party (assignee).
The party who owes the duty (typically to pay
the third party) is the obligor.

176
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment of Rights to a Third Party

A

Rule: Occurs when a contract has a (1) Third-Party Beneficiary and (2) Assignment

Example:
Batman contracts to provide security for Gotham City for
$200,000. Batman (“assignor”) then assigns his right to
the payment to Robin (“assignee”). Robin has the right to
receive payment from Gotham City (“obligor”).

Exam Tip: In an assignment, two parties enter a contract and a third
person (the assignee) appears later on. With third-party
beneficiary, all three persons are present from the start.

177
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment: Valid Assignments**

A

Rule: Valid assignments must have language of

PRESENT transfer**

178
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment: Consideration

A

Rule: Consideration is not required to make a valid assignment

179
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment: Restrictions on Assignments

A

Rule: Contract Language Controls. Distinguish a clause that “prohibits” assignment from one that completely “invalidates” assignment

Exam Tip: If it’s a close call, opt for prohibition over invalidation, therefore, assignee can still collect if she did not know of
the prohibition.

180
Q

Third-Party Issues - Assignment: Substantial Change**

A

Rule: Assignments cannot substantially change duties of obligor

181
Q

Third-Party Issues - Obligor Liability to Assignee After the

Assignment

A

Rule: Obligor has to pay assignee or can sue directly

Exception: Not applicable if assignor did not perform under the contract

Exception: Only liable once made aware of the assignment

182
Q

Third-Party Issues - Multiple Assignments: Who Will Collect

A
  1. Gratuitous (“Gift”) Assignments

2. Assignments for Consideration

183
Q

Third-Party Issues - Multiple Assignments: Gratuitous (Gift) Assignments

A

Rule: Last in Time - The last gratuitous assignee prevails over earlier gratuitous assignees because a later gift assignment revokes an earlier one

Gratuitous (“Gift”) assignments are easily
revoked.

Note: Promises to assign is not valid language of present assignment

184
Q

Third-Party Issues - Multiple Assignments: Assignments for Consideration

A

Rule: First in Time -
The first assignee for consideration prevails over
all subsequent assignees as well as prior gratuitous
assignees.

Assignments for consideration are more durable (first one wins)

Exception: A later assignee for consideration prevails if he does not know of the earlier assignments and is the first to get payment from or a judgment against the obligor

185
Q

Delegation of Duties to a Third Party (Generally)

A

Definition: Delegation is a transfer of contract duties, not a transfer of rights

186
Q

Delegation of Duties to a Third Party

A

General Rule: Contractual duties may be delegated to another party without the consent of the person to whom performance is owed (the “obligee”)
Note: Consent NOT requires

Exceptions:

(1) Contract language controls
(2) Person with Special Skill or Reputation

187
Q

Delegation of Duties to a Third Party: Exception - Contract Language Controls

A

Exception Rule: If contract states you cannot delegate, then you cannot delegate

Extra Exception Rule: If a contract prohibits assignment then it also prohibits delegation as well

188
Q

Delegation of Duties to a Third Party: Exception - Person with Special Skill or Reputation

A

Exception Rule: You cannot delegate a contract for person with special skill or reputation

189
Q

Delegation of Duties to a Third Party: Right of the Obligee

A

(1) Delegating Party Always Remains Liable
- Note: Compare/ contrast with novation**

(2) A Delegate Who Gets Consideration Is Liable
- Note: Creates third-party beneficiary obligations

190
Q

Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo

A

Rule: A confirmatory memo is not an offer. It is a method of satisfying the Statute of Frauds in contracts between merchants. The confirmatory memo rule states that if one party, within a reasonable time after an oral agreement has been made, sends to the other party a written confirmation of the understanding that is sufficient under the Statute of Frauds to bind the sender, it will also bind the recipient if:

(i) he has reason to know of the confirmation’s contents; and
(ii) he does not object to it in writing within 10 days of receipt

191
Q

Remedies for Impossibility

A

Rule: If there is impossibility, each party is excused from duties that are yet to be performed. If either party has partially performed prior to the existence of facts resulting in impossibility, that party has a right to recover in quasi-contract for the reasonable value of his performance. While that value is usually based on the benefit received by the defendant (unjust enrichment), it also may be measured by the detriment suffered by the plaintiff (the reasonable value of the work performed)

192
Q

Impossibility Test

A

Rule: Contractual duties are discharged where it has become impossible to perform them. The occurrence of an unanticipated or extraordinary event may make contractual duties impossible to perform.
Test
(1) If the nonoccurrence of the event was a basic assumption of the parties in making the contract, and
(2) neither party has assumed the risk of the event’s occurrence, duties under the contract may be discharged

193
Q

Contractor Liability

A

General Rule: A contractor is responsible for destruction of the premises under construction prior to completion. Once the residence is completed, risk of loss shifts to the owner

194
Q

UCC Performance for Particular Goods

A

Rule: Under the UCC, if a contract requires for its performance particular goods identified when the contract is made, and, before risk of loss passes to the buyer, the goods are destroyed without the fault of either party, the contract is avoided

195
Q

Avoiding the Preexisting Duty Rule

A

The promise to perform, or the performance of an existing legal duty is not consideration. Thus modifying the original consideration, even slightly, is generally enough to avoid the rule.

Additional Rule: An alternative method of payment can suffice as sufficient consideration for a creditor to discharge an existing, undisputed debt (paying before maturity, paying to someone other than credit, paying in stock vs cash)

196
Q

Preexisting Duty Rule: Third Parties

A

Modern Rule: Under the prevailing modern rule, the preexisting duty rule does not apply if the duty is owed to a third person

Traditional Rule: Traditionally, performance cannot be used as valid consideration for another promise, if a preexisting duty exists

197
Q

Consideration for Modification - Modern View

A

Rule: The modern view permits modification without consideration if it is fair and equitable in view of unanticipated circumstances

198
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

Rule: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds, there must be one or more writings that reflect the all essential/ material terms of the contract signed by the person sought to be held liable on the contract.

The Statute does not require both parties to sign, only the party to be charged.

199
Q

Exception to the SOF: Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo

A

Rule: One party can use its own signed writing to satisfy the SOF against the other party if:
(i) Both parties are merchants;
(ii) Writing claims agreement & has quantity;
and
(iii) There is no written objection within 10 days

200
Q

SOF - Sale of Land with no Purchase Price

A

Generally, under the Statute of Frauds, a promise creating an interest in land must be evidenced by a writing to be enforceable. A seller can enforce an oral land sale contract only if the seller conveys the property to the buyer.

201
Q

Contract Modification - Common Law

A

Rule: Under Common Law, ew consideration is required to modify a contract, performing a preexisting duty is not enough

Exception: If third-party comes in, then is enforceable

Exception: Modern View: The modern view permits modification without consideration if it is fair and equitable in view of unanticipated circumstances

202
Q

Contract Modification - Article 2

A

Rule: Under Article 2, Consideration is NOT required to modify a contract for the sale of goods, if there is good faith

ex. suffering serious and unanticipated changes

203
Q

Other K Defenses

A
  • Duress
  • Misrepresentation
  • Fraud
204
Q

Good Faith

A

Rule: Good faith means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing

205
Q

Duress

A

Rule: K can be voided for duress when a party’s assent to a contract is induced by an improper threat by another party that leaves the victim no reasonable alternative

Test: Withholding something can constitute duress if (1) the party threatens to commit a wrongful act that would seriously threaten the other contracting party’s property or finances, and (2) there are no adequate means available to prevent the threatened loss

July 2021 Bar Exam (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions