Crack the core WHen I Say you say... Flashcards
(489 cards)
cystic mass in the liver of newborn
hepatoblastoma
elevated AFP with liver mass in newborn
hepatoblastoma
common bile duct > 10 mm
choledochal cyst
lipomatous pseudohypertrophy of pancreas
CF
unilateral renal agenesis
unicornuate uterus
neonatal renal vein thrombosis
maternal diabetes
neonatal renal artery thrombosis
misplaced umbilical artery catheter
hydro on fetal MRI
posterior urethral valve
urachus
bladder adenocarcinoma
nephroblastomatosis with necrosis
Wilms
solid renal tumor of infancy
mesoblastic nephroma
Mesoblastic nephroma
Dr Mohamed Saber and Dr Yuranga Weerakkody◉ et al.
Mesoblastic nephroma, also sometimes known as a congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN) or fetal renal hamartoma, is, in general, a benign renal tumour that typically occurs in utero or in infancy.
Epidemiology
It is the commonest neonatal renal tumour. Diagnosis is usually made in the antenatal period or immediately after birth. The tumour accounts for approximately 3-6% of all renal neoplasms in children 3,7. Approximately 50% occur during the neonatal period and most of the cases are diagnosed within the first 3 months of life 11. Overall, 90% of the cases are discovered by the age of 1 year 11.
Clinical presentation
Most common clinical presentation is a palpable abdominal mass, with haematuria occurring less frequently.
Pathology
It is a mesenchymal tumour. Macroscopically the tumour is a solid un-encapsulated mass which often occurs near the renal hilum. It tends to invade the surrounding structures and renal parenchyma. Haemorrhage and necrosis are infrequent. Histologically, it is typically composed of connective tissue growing between nephrons, usually replacing most of the renal parenchyma.
The classic cytological description of the lesion is that of cellular clusters of spindle cells, mild nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity and no blastema.
Subtypes
There are two main pathological variants:
classic mesoblastic nephroma: accounts for less than one third of cases of CMN 11
cellular mesoblastic nephroma
more heterogeneous in appearance on imaging
tends to be larger and presents later in infancy (> 3 months of life 11)
may exhibit aggressive behaviour including vascular encasement and metastasis 5
Associations
polyhydramnios
fetal hypercalcaemia
Radiographic features
Plain radiograph
Non specific and not an imaging modality of choice but if performed incidentally in a neonate, may demonstrate a soft tissue mass displacing bowel. Calcification is rare 3.
Ultrasound
Sonographic appearance can vary depending on the pathological variant 6. In general it is a well-defined mass with low-level homogeneous echoes. The presence of concentric echogenic and hypoechoic rings can be a helpful diagnostic feature in the classic subtype, but may also be seen in the cellular subtype 11. A more complex pattern due to haemorrhage, cyst formation and necrosis can also be seen and tends to favour the cellular variant. Colour Doppler interrogation may show increased vascularity. Uncommonly the tumour may appear predominantly cystic 11.
Antenatal ultrasound may also show evidence of associated polyhydramnios.
CT
Usually not performed in an antenatal situation. Solid hypoattenuating renal lesion with variable contrast enhancement. Cystic areas, necrosis, and haemorrhage are uncommon (only in cellular type) 5. Typically no calcification seen. Hyperdense foci, however, may be seen related to haemorrhage in the cellular subtype 13.
MRI
Best modality for cross sectional imaging antenatally and can better assess anatomical relationships.
Unless complicated necrosis and haemorrhage (both generally uncommon), general signal characteristics within the mass include:
T1: iso to hypointense 8, may show hyperintense foci related to haemorrhage in the cellular subtype 13
T2: variable, from markedly hypointense to hyperintense 11
DWI: shows restricted diffusion in the solid portion of the tumour, likely related to increase cellularity 12
Treatment and prognosis
The majority are benign tumours and have a favourable outcome. The cellular variant can, at times, be aggressive. As a surgical option, a nephrectomy usually suffices.
Complications
Potential complications with large tumours include:
abdominal dystocia at birth
arterio-venous shunting with subsequent development of hydrops fetalis
Differential diagnosis
Wilms tumour
renal clear cell sarcoma
rhabdoid tumour
solid renal tumor of childhood
Wilms
midline pelvic mass female
hydrometrocolpos
right-sided varicocele
abdominal pathology
blue dot sign
torsion of testicular appendage
hand or foot pain/swelling in infant
sickle cell with hand foot syndrome
extratesticular scrotal mass
embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
narrowing of interpedicular distance
achondroplasia
platyspondyly
thanatophoric
absent tonsils after 6 months
immune deficiency
enlarged tonsils well after childhood (age 12-15)
cancer… probably lymphatic
mystery liver abscess in kid
chronic granulomatous disease
narrowed B ring
Schatzki (“Schat Bki Ring”)
Schatzki ring
Dr Matt A. Morgan◉ and Dr Jeremy Jones◉ et al.
A Schatzki ring, also called Schatzki-Gary ring, is symptomatically narrow oesophageal B-ring occurring in the distal oesophagus and usually associated with a hiatus hernia.
Epidemiology
Relatively common, lower oesophageal rings are found in ~10% of oesophagrams.
Clinical presentation
Most commonly it presents as intermittent dysphagia, especially to solid food. A history of food impaction is also very common. Dysphagia is more common in patients with an associated motility disorder.
Pathology
The pathogenesis of the Schatzki ring is unclear with conflicting hypotheses that include redundant pleats of mucosa, congenital abnormalities and modified peptic strictures. Interestingly, there is a reduced incidence of Barrett oesophagus in patients with a Schatzki ring.
Depending on its luminal diameter, an oesophageal B-ring may be symptomatic or asymptomatic 4:
<13 mm: almost always symptomatic
13-20 mm: sometimes symptomatic
>20 mm: rarely symptomatic
When it is symptomatic, it is termed a “Schatzki ring”.
Location
Schatzki rings are located at the gastro-oesophageal junction, illustrated by the fact that there is squamous epithelium above and columnar epithelial below the ring. They should not be confused with
A-rings, which are found a few centimetres proximal to the B-ring
oesophageal webs, which are lined on both sides by oesophageal mucosa 6-8
Associations
More than half of patients will have an associated oesophageal condition such as 2:
hiatus hernia
reflux oesophagitis
oesophageal web
oesophageal diverticulum
Radiographic features
Fluoroscopy: barium swallow
Single-contrast solid barium swallows (especially in the RAO prone position) are more sensitive than endoscopy in detecting Schatzki rings 3. On barium swallow the following features may be seen 1:
full-column barium swallow will reveal a circumferential narrowing at the gastro-oesophageal junction, often a few centimetres above the diaphragmatic hiatus
thin smooth ring, 1-3 mm
double contrast studies are less sensitive
performing a Valsalva manoeuvre may improve sensitivity
barium-tablet or barium-coated marshmallow may also improve sensitivity
History and etymology
It is named after Richard Schatzki (1901-92), American physician (born in Germany) 1.
Differential diagnosis
On fluoroscopy consider
ringlike peptic stricture: the indentations are fixed, asymmetric, and wider than those seen in a mucosal B ring.
distal oesophageal carcinoma: usually irregular in appearance
oesophageal A-ring
oesophageal web

esophageal concentric rings

eosinophilic esophagitis
Idiopathic eosinophilic oesophagitis
Dr Henry Knipe◉◈ and Dr Marcin Czarniecki et al.
Idiopathic eosinophilic oesophagitis is an inflammatory disease of the oesophagus characterised by eosinophilia that can involve all the layers of the oesophagus.
Epidemiology
It is most commonly seen in males aged 20-40. It is an uncommon disease; however not rare.
Clinical presentation
Patients typically present with dysphagia or with food stuck in the oesophagus. Usually, a specific food or allergen triggers the presentation, and symptoms may persist for a long time afterwards.
Pathology
The exact aetiology is unknown. Exposure to food or allergen triggers the activation of eosinophils within the oesophageal wall and a consequent inflammatory cascade ensues.
Oesophageal strictures, webs and spasm cause the presentation of food impaction.
Radiographic features
Fluoroscopy
‘ringed’ oesophagus: concentric, ring-like strictures of the oesophagus on a barium swallow
these ring-like strictures may co-exist with longer strictures and may be associated with oesophageal spasm, dysmotility and foreshortening
CT
non-specific oesophageal submucosal oedema
Treatment and prognosis
It is self-limiting in some cases but responds well to oral glucocorticoid therapy. It may lead to growth retardation in some children.
Differential diagnosis
gastro-oesophageal reflux, especially if the feline oesophagus is present
oesophageal spasm
intestinal parasitic infestation
drug-induced oesophagitis
References























































































