Crim Law Flashcards
(96 cards)
When can a judge instruct the jury on a lesser included offense?
Note: D not charged with lesser included offense?
Court can instruct jury on a lesser included offense if––based on E presented at trial––a rational jury could acquit the D of the higher charged offense, but convict the D of the lesser offense
Which inchoate crimes merger?
only solicitation & attempt
*Conspiracy does not merge
Solicitation
- enticed, encouraged, commanded
- another to commit a crime
- SI that the person commit the crime
Conspiracy – Modern/Majority/MPC
Unilateral approach
- < 1 person
- specifically intends to enter
- into an K; and
- an overt act was committed
Conspiracy – CL/ Minority
Bilateral
- 2+ people
- specifically intent
- to enter into a K
*no overt act needed
Attempt – Act (2 types)
CL –Dangerous Proximity Test
Majority/MPC – Substantial Step Test
Dangerous Proximity Test
CL test for an “act” under attempt
D performs act sufficiently close to completing crime (must exceed early steps of planning)
EX:
- act necessary for crime’s success;
- act close in time or physical proximity to crime
Substantial Step Test
Maj/MPC test for “act” for attempt
D’s conduct exceeds:
1. mere prep
2. strongly corroborates D’s
3. criminal intent
EX:
- surveilling place where crime is to occur
Accessory After the Fact
- Knows principal committed a felony
- Aided/assisted the P after felony committed; and
- did so for specific purpose of
- helping P
- Avoid arrest or conviction
Only G for separate crime – “obstruction of justice” “harboring fugitive”
Accomplice v. Accessory After the Fact
Accomplice either helps or encourages Principal with the intent that P will commit the crime
Accessory After the Fact – helping after the crime is done
- includes if he was the getaway driver (didnt know abt crime), then sees crime happen, and still drive P away to safety
Exigent Circumstances
Exigent Circumstances – exception that justifies a warrantless police conduct when they have PC to believe that one of the following exists:
- Imminent threat E will be destroyed
- Hot pursuit – suspect feeling after felony occurred
- Emergency aid – immediate threat of harm to PO and/or public
SAD SPACES
Exceptions to a warrantless search:
- Search incident to valid arrest
- Admin search of highly regulated industry
- Stop and Frisk
- Plain View Doctrine
- Automobile Exception
- Consent
- Exigent Circumstances
- Special Govt purposes
Does the exigent circ exception apply when homeowner tells police not to enter [to save them].
YES – PO can still enter w/o 4A violation if the HO unequivocally invokes right to a warrant!
If the HO is in danger, PO can enter if they. have an objection reasonable belief that the person needs emergency aid
Robbery v. Armed Robbery
Robbery – threatful taking
Armed Robbery – armed threatful taking
Need SI to commit each
Murder – CL
Unlawful killing by a human committed w/ malice aforethought:
- intent to kill
- intent to cause serious bodily harm
- depraved heart murder
- Felony Murder
Voluntary Manslaughter
Intentional killing mitigated by either:
- Adequate Provocation – heat of passion
- no time to cool off - Imperfect Self-Defense
- D started altercation or unreasonably believed it necessary to use deadly force
Involuntary Manslaughter
Unintentional killing either:
- Caused by criminal negligence (or recklessness under MPC), that put person in significant risk of harm
- Unlawful Act – killing committed during commission of:
(a) malum in se MisD (assault, battery); or
(b) felony not treated as 1st or 2nd degree murder
(ie, misD manslaughter; act willfully or constituted crim neg)
Constitutionally Protected Areas
areas protected from unlawful 4A search
- body
- house
- papers
Special Govt Purpose
Exception to warrantless search/seizure
typically involves situations where the government has a compelling interest or a specific need related to public safety, law enforcement, or national security.
ie, needing to get DNA swabs from arrestees
6A Ineffective Assitance of Counsel
D can have conviction overturned by showing:
- Deficient Performance – atty’s rep fell below objective profession standard of reasonableness; and
- Prejudice – reasonable probably that outcome would be different but for deficiency
Atty Duty to Investigate – capital case
6A – IAC
If atty is repping D in capital offense –> has duty to conduct reasonable investigation to determine if there are mitigating facts for penalty phase that may lead to diff outcome
failure to do so –> deficient performance
“maybe I need a lawyer,” said D during interrogation. Does this trigger 5A R2C?
No –request for counsel was not unequivocal and explicit, so PO can continue interrogation w/o 5A violation
Use of Deadly Force – Self Defense
- actual + reasonable belief of imminent serious harm or death
- deadly force necessary to prevent harm
- not initial aggressor
MAJ* – no duty to retreat
MIN – duty to retreat, unless at home
*maj is default
Attempted Murder
D has:
1. SI to commit murder
- committed an act in furtherance of murder
- did not complete the murder
Once act occurs, D can be convicted of attempt, even if result was factually impossible