Crime and Deviance - Ethnicity, Crime and Justice Flashcards
(37 cards)
What is the issue with use of official statistics in finding out about ethnic differences in offending rates?
They don’t tell us directly about the differences in offending, only the filtered perceptions of the criminal justice system; differences in stop and search rates may be due to police strategies of racism (Macpherson (1999))
What do victim surveys tell us about ethnic differences in offending?
- Black people are significantly overrepresented in being identified as offenders of ‘mugging’ by victims
- A great deal of crime is also intra-ethnic
What is the issue with victim surveys in regard to ethnicity?
- Phillips and Bowling (2012): white victims ‘over-identify’ black people as offenders even when not sure
- Only covers personal crimes, 20% of all crime
- Tell nothing about crime by and against organisations, such as white collar and corportae crime
Graham and Bowling (1995) and ethnic differences in crime:
Using a self-report study, they find that Black and white people have a similar offending rate, ~45%, while South Asian people have a much lower offending rate (Indians having the highest at 30%)
Sharp and Budd (2005) and class A narcotics:
White people participate in class A drugs like heroin and coke 3x more than black people and 6x more than Asians.
Give three examples of oppressive policing, given by Phillips and Bowling (2012).
- Police violence
- Mass surveilance
- Failure to address racist crime
How much more likely are Black people to be stopped and searched than White people?
According to a Parliament Comittee, black people are 9.5x more likely to be stopped and searched.
What makes Asian people more likely to be stopped and searched?
Asians, specifically South Asians, have been disproportionately stopped and searched under the Terrorism Act 2000
Phillips and Bowling (2007) and the effect of stop-and-search:
Members of affected communities have limited faith in the police and feel ‘over-policed and under-protected.’
What are three possible explanations for ethnic differences in stops and searches?
- Police racism: Phillips and Bowling (2012) found that, reinforced by police ‘canteen culture’, officers deliberately targeted ethnic minorities due to negative stereotypes
- Ethnic differences in offending: it is important to note that officers only act on information in low discretion stops but discrimination is more likely in high discretion stops where they act without intelligence
- Demographic factors: Ethnic minorities are overepresented in other groups more likely to be stopped, such as the young, manual workers, or the unemployed.
How are arrests and caustions affected by ethnicity? Why?
Black people are 3x more likely to be arrested but still less likely to recieve a caution. This may be due to distrust of the police leading many deny any offence and exercise right to legal council, making a caution impossible.
What is the Crown Prosecution Service?
The government body that decides whether a case brought by the police has adequate evidence to go to court.
Bowling and Phillips (2002) and the Crown Prosecution Service:
CPS is more likely to drop cases against ethnic minorities as the evidence is seen as insufficient and often based on stereotyping.
What type of trial is preferred by ethnic minorities? What is the result?
They often opt for trial by jury in a Crown Court rather than a magistrates’ court, fearing discrimination from a magistrate. However, Crown Courts can also give harsher sentences.
How is sentencing for different ethnic groups perculiar?
Black and Asian defendants are less likely to be found guilty; however, they are also give much harsher sentences, Black and Asian men recieve 3 and 9 months more respectively than White men (Hood (1992)).
Hudson and Bramhall (2005) and pre-sentence reports:
PSRs, provided to magistrates courts to asisst in sentencing, are less comprehensive for Asian defendants and often suggest that they are unremorseful, causing harsher sentencing. This reflects post-9/11 demonisation of Muslims.
How does imprisonment reflect ethnic differences?
- Black people are 4x more likely to be in prison
- All minority ethnic groups have higher proportions of prisoners on remand (awaiting trial) as they are less likely to be granted bail
What are the 5 main explanations for ethnic differences in offending?
- Lea and Young (1993): delinquent subcultures
- Gilroy (1979): resistance against racism
- Hall et al (1978): capitalist manipulation
- FitzGerald (2003): neighbourhoods
- Sharp and Budd (2005): more likely to get caught
What is the core dispute between left realists and neo-marxists on ethnic differences in offending?
Left realists see stats as representing real differences in offending, neo-marxists see it as a social construction resulting from racial bias.
What do Lea and Young (1993) disregard as an explanation for ethnic differences in offending?
Discriminatory policing:
- Over 90% of crime known to the police is reported by the public, the police lack the adequate knowledge to cause such a drastic difference
- Black people have a significantly higher rate of criminalisation than Asians so police would need to be incredibly selective
Refute Lea and Young’s (1993) denial.
- Pre-9/11, Asians were viewed as passive (Wright (1997)) causing them to be arrested less; however, since, we have seen increasing arrests of Asians due to Islamaphobia
Why do Lea and Young (1993) see black people as more vulnerable to crime?
Black people are disproportionately affected by all the main causes of crime: societal racism causes marginalisation and inhibits them from lifting themselves out of poverty, exacerbating relative depravation. A response to this is the formation of subcultures that commit utilitarian crime to reduce relative depravation and non-utilitarian crime to vent frustrations at the system.
Give a criticism of Lea and Young (1993).
The entire theory depends on the idea that official statistics are entirly valid reflections of offending rates but these are also informed by racism: Phillips and Bowling (2012) find that white victims over-identify black people as offenders even when uncertain.
Gilroy (1982) and racial resistance:
Ethnic minority crime is a form of political resistance against a white supremacist UK, utilising the same forms of struggles that their ancestors utilised against imperialism and colonialism. This political struggle is a threat to white supremacy so is criminalised.