Crime Control Flashcards
(49 cards)
What are the aims of the criminal justice system?
1.) Deterrence: putting people off
2.) Public protection: maintain order, prevent further harm
3.) Retribution: punishing for wrongdoings
4.) Rehabilitation: reforming criminals
What is said about changing approaches to justice?
GARLAND:
- 20th century —> rehabilitation
- 1970s —> retributive justice + harsher penalties (Newbury calls this their just desert)
Shown by a significant increase in imprisonment in the UK between 1970-2014.
What has there been uncertainty about within the changing approaches to justice?
- Uncertainty whether deterrents such as imprisonment are working.
- Crawford and Evans, 1980s —> crime reduction focuses on preventing future crime, there has been growing recognition that the CJS should also focus on rights protection and needs of victims.
What is said about the culture of control from left realism to right realism?
- A shift from Left Realists approaches to more Right Realist approaches.
- Left realist: causes of crime
- Right realist: focuses on criminals, reduces opportunities for crime.
GARLAND: culture of control —> concerned with reducing the risks of people becoming victims rather than rehabilitation of criminals. Accompanied by growing use of private security.
What is restorative justice?
- More attempts to divert people involved in minor offending away from formal sanctions.
- Allows avoidance of minor offenders entering universities of crime.
- Victims and offenders are brought together to repair the harm caused and take responsibility.
- BRAITHWAITE: more effective involving reintegrative shaming (name and shaming, face to face with victims)
What does Foucault suggest about surveillance?
FOUCAULT:
- Surveillance: monitoring + controlling behaviour of criminals.
- Leads to self surveillance.
What does Foucault say about the growth of surveillance?
- We live in an age of panopticism
What is the concept Foucault uses to describe contemporary societies?
- Carceral archipelago (a prison consisting of a series of islands) is used by Foucault to describe contemporary societies.
- Every public location like a small panopticon in which everyone is subject to surveillance.
- E.g. school government agencies gather huge amounts of data on every individual.
Surveillance is now used to not just track criminals but to also prevent potential crime and non conformist behaviour.
What is the role of surveillance technology?
Surveillance technology:
(Technologies of power and disciplinary technologies - FOUCAULT)
- Enables the state to exercise disciplinary power over the whole population.
What does Lyon argue about surveillance in modern societies?
- Enhanced by information and communication technologies (ICTs).
- Both suspects and ordinary peoples data’s are of interest.
- Argues that everyday life has become less private.
- Surveillance is a key part of everyday life, makes sense to talk of surveillance societies where ICTs enable total social control.
What are some round the clock surveillance technologies and what do they do?
- CCTV, face recognition software, automatic number plate recognition systems
- Monitor the movements of all people, become a means of controlling all crime and disorder, by avoiding the risk of it taking place in the first place.
- And by tracking potential offenders.
How many cameras are installed across the UK?
- According to the British security industry association, an estimated 5 million CCTV cameras are installed across the UK.
- This makes Britain one of the most heavily surveilled countries in Europe, with the police routinely using video footage to identify criminals.
What else is surveillance used for, other than around crime?
- Consumer tracking
- Where a large amount of data is collected on individuals.
- For example, Tesco Club card collects information about every product a customer purchases, providing a profile of the lifestyle of that person.
What are Internet Service Providers legally required to do?
- ISPs are now legally required to hang onto their users communications and often an individuals digital footprint which provides more information than direct, physical observation.
- Everything is visible to the state or large corporations such as Apple, Google and Amazon.
Who is monitoring us according to Foucault?
- FOUCAULT suggests we are now living in a carceral (prison-like) culture, in which the panopticon model of surveillance has been spread throughout society.
- Society itself has become a gigantic panopticon, where everyone is being watched by those with power (the judges of normality) in order to impose conformist behaviour through self discipline.
How can you evaluate Foucault with synoptic surveillance?
MATHIESEN:
- In a contemporary society, it is not just the few who monitor the many.
- The media enables the many to monitor the few, e.g. by media stories on corrupt or immoral behaviour by politicians —> we live in a synopticon.
- Another example is where the public monitor each other through dashcams or helmet cams.
- The widespread ownership of cameras and camera phones means people can monitor the monitors e.g. by filming illegal behaviour by the police.
How can you use surveillance assemblages to evaluate Foucault?
HAGGERTY AND ERICSON:
- Surveillance technologies now ‘talk’ to one another, e.g. number plate recognition software and CCTV footage.
- Data doubles of individuals can be created and monitored e.g. through mobile phone communication, rather than monitoring the physical individual.
How can you use risk management to evaluate Foucault?
FEELY AND SIMON:
Surveillance is different now to Foucault:
1.) It focuses on groups rather than individuals.
2.) It uses calculations of risk
E.g. Airport screening checks, which are based on known risk factors.
The effect of this is to place entire social groups under suspicion. E.g. 2010 West Midlands police sought to introduce a counterterrorism scheme to surround two mainly Muslim suburbs of Birmingham with automatic number plate recognition cameras, thereby placing whole communities under suspicion.
—> The problem with risk management is the danger of a self fulfilling prophecy.
How can you use labelling to evaluate Foucault?
NORRIS AND ARMSTRONG:
- Research shows that CCTV operators make discriminatory judgements about who they should focus on. This results in targeting of young black males.
How can you use social media surveillance to evaluate Foucault?
LYON:
- Social media now means that we monitor each other.
- We often willingly volunteer information about ourselves which we upload to social media accounts.
- Enables us to be monitored.
- Social media companies then follow a market logic where they use this personal data to sell advertising which allows us to be targeted by companies.
What is Foucaults explanations for why punishments have changed over time?
Foucault: punishments have changed from sovereign power to disciplinary power.
- The decline in public forms of physical punishment is due to the changing structures of power in society.
- Public brutal punishments —> demonstrations of the supreme power of the sovereign over criminals. (Called this sovereign power).
- As sovereign power declined there developed a new form of state power and control over criminals. (Called this disciplinary power).
- Criminals were to be controlled and disciplined by surveillance
What does Rushe and Kirchheimer say about punishment, class domination and control?
RUSHE AND KIRCHHEIMER:
- Marxist perspective
- Punishments as apart of social control and class domination in unequal societies.
- They see the changing forms of punishment over time arising from the changing economic interests of the dominant class.
- Brutal punishments increased when there was plenty of labour and declined when there was a labour shortage.
What is the functionalist perspective to punishment?
DURKHEIM:
- Societies can only exist if they have value consensus that form moral ties binding communities together —> collective conscience. Laws are an expression of this.
What are the criticisms for the functionalist perspective to punishment?
- Assumes law reflects value consensus
- Ignores inequalities in wealth and power
- Imprisonment may not assist in social order but may threaten it as prisons often act as universities of crime