crime prevention, control and punishment Flashcards
(22 cards)
what are the types of crime prevention strategy?
- situational crime prevention (at the point crime occurs)
- environmental crime prevention (making an area less attractive for criminals and clamping down on it quickly
- social and community crime prevention (intervening with individuals at risk of becoming criminal and alternatives to crime
Situational explanation
- most crime is opportunistic- people happen to see opportunities
- CCTV, street lights, barricades, barbed wire, spiky fences, no climb paint etc
- less opportunity for crime (risk/reward) which increases chances of getting caught
- however, they are displaced to an easier target
- example: NYC bus port authority bus terminal- Marcus Felson 1998
pros and cons of situational crime prevention
PROS
- low cost depending on sich
- simple solution
- easy and quick fix
- reduce opportunisitc crime
- protects a whole area
- cost effective
- visible and people feel safe
CONS
- displacement
- ignores root causes (Garland 2001)
- not long term
- crime might get more severe
- Crawford and Evans (2013): fortress society created, people feel like they’re being watched and punished when they’re not supposed to be, reduces civil liberties and harms most vulnerable
- inconvenience
environmental crime prevention explanation
- clean up grafitti and vandalism immediately- clean cars program NYC
- zero tolerance and broken windows theory
- deal with all crime no matter how petty
- dispersal order, alcohol ban, panopticon
environmental crime prevention pros and cons
PROS
- investment in local areas more effective than 0 tol
- long term cost effectice
- long term effects
CONS
- unaffordable to employ enough police (short term fix)
- different governments and reduction in budgets affect it
social and community crime prevention
- troubled families programme (2012-2015)
- create sens of community to counteract feelings of marginalisation
- left realists- cause of social crime, prevents crime by improving community
pros and cons of social and community crime prevention
PROS
- long term benefits, engaging people
- shared responsibility, we help each other
- cost effective in the long term
- wider unintentional projects
- addresses root causes and tackles LR factors
CONS
- time consuming to take effect, lots of crime happens in meantime and the programme may be stopped before taking effect
- romanticising criminality
- expensive and people demand gov results immediately
- won’t always be effective on everyone
- resource heavy and requires a lot of support
what is surveillance?
a method of exerting control over individuals by collecting data on their actions, this is commonplace now through digital technologies
Focault (the panopticon)
- physical punishment has been replaced by psychological punishment due to the advancement of civilisation which allows more effective punishments within a carceral culture
- The panopticon was a circular prison where there was a central guardtower, but prisoners were unaware whether they were being watched at any given time which led to self-regulation of behaviours
- they regulated their own behaviours since they wouldn’t be caught behaving deviantly, giving self-discipline
- we now have an electronic panopticon which uses data to monitor our behaviours and alter our opinions (eg cambridge analytica scandal!!)
Surveillance of elites/Sous surveillance- Mathiesen
- suggested that due to digital tech and mass media, this led to bottom up surveillance
- many people were able to monitor the behaviour of the few
Synoptic surveillance
- the idea that everyone monitors each other which alters our behaviour
- individuals surveill each other by recording videos of crimes happening or monitoring others’ social media for content which might cause offence
- recording equipment in vehicles exemplifies this
Integrated surveillance
- surveillance systems communicate with each other to gain data and capture movements of individuals
- this leads to internalised forms of surveillance, where people adjust their behaviour as they know they’re being watched
Actuarial justice (feely and Simon)
- the data used to predict behaviours based upon their activities
- Lyon- people are categorised according to levels of risk they present
- the state monitors individuals it believes to have potetial for committing crime
Evaluations of surveillance
- actuarial justice is often based upon racial stereotyping of individuals
- there are impacts of labelling individuals as criminal
- assume human behaviour is subject to rational thought processes
- CCTV often captures crime, but doesn’t act as deterrent
- mass media can manipulate images and bury news that is harmful to the status quo
Liquid surveillance (Bauman)
a constant flow of data and information seeping into every part of one’s life, the ways you are monitored and tracked which happen all around you all the time
Surveillance society (Lyon)
- our lives are transparent with a lack of privacy but we are also accepting of this and take it as a given that the government has information on us
- we experience external surveillance through CCTV cameras and online tracking and internalised surveillance where we monitor ourselves
Self surveillance/ internalised
when we monitor and control behaviours because we know we’re being watched
Surveillant assembleges
- masses of data assembled to create a ‘data double’ or a ‘digital self’- you can be known even if never met in person
what 4 ways does the CJS use to punish existing crime and prevent future crime?
- deterrance
- protection
- retribution
- rehabilitation
Garland 2001 (USA prison stats + theory)
- ‘penal welfarism’ has moved to ‘mass incarceration’ to ‘transcarceration’
- in the USA, 3% of the adult population is in Prison (37%= black american), higher than EU imprisonment rates
- 30-40% of US prison population is unemployed
- diversion= early intervention diverts people away from crime (LR solutions)
- culture of control has been established- care more about punishment and prevention rather than rehab
Theoretical perspectives on crime punishment
- Func- punishments are needed for boundary maintenance
- Marxism- ISA and RSA enable rich to maintain control over the poor, can prevent revolution, divert attention from structural inequality
- Rusche and Kircheimer- capitalism uses punishment depending on what type of economy- prison allows workers to be recalled. Bureaucracy of the CJS now prevents the rich from personally punishing the poor
The role of Prison through time
- pre 18thC= prison was used to hold people before they were punished
- enlightenment- prison itself became the punishment rather than torture
- mordern era- prison is punishment but isn’t inhumane, prisoners are treated well and rehab is the focus