Criminal Courts and Lay People; Appeals and appellate courts Flashcards
(42 cards)
Explain the grounds/reasons the defence OR prosecution may raise to appeal in a criminal case (8 marks)
Explain the criminal appeal process and structure for appeals involving criminal trials which were originally heard in the Magistrates’ Court (8 marks)
Explain the criminal appeal process and structure for appeals involving trials which were originally heard in the Crown Court (8 marks)
Introduction
The Criminal Courts system provides appeal routes for defendants in all cases and to the prosecution in certain situations. The routes are different depending on where your trial was heard and the reasons for appealing
If your trial was at the Magistrates’ court:
Appeals against sentence or conviction
When does the defendant have a right of appeal against a conviction or sentence
- The defendant has an automatic right of appeal against conviction or sentence
- Where the defendant originally pleaded not guilty
How long must an appeal be made after the conclusion of the case
An appeal must be made within 21 days of the conclusion of the case
If appealing against conviction;
What kind of judge re-hears the case and with who else
-A Crown Court judge re-hears the case with two Magistrates.
What can these personnel decide to do
A Crown Court Judge with two Magistrates can:
- Come to the same decision
- Reverse the decision
If appealing against sentence;
What can these personnel decide to do if appealing against sentence
A Crown Court judge can:
- Impose a harsher sentence, but only to the maximum sentence available to Magistrates
Appeals from the Magistrates court to the crown court (not sure on this);
Who is this available to
Only the defence
Reason for appeal
Against sentence and or conviction
Who is the appeal heard from
Panel of a single Circuit judge and two magistrates
Is further appeal possible
Generally no, but possible to appeal to the Queens Bench Divisional court purely on a point of law
Result of appeal
Appeal quashed,
confirm appeal
or remit case back to the Magistrates court
Case Stated Appeals: appeals on the grounds that there has been an error of law or the magistrates have acted out of their jurisdiction
Where can these be made from
These can be made directly from the Magistrates Court or as an appeal from the Crown court
What is the basis for the appeal
The basis for the appeal is a claim that the Magistrates made an error or law or acted outside their jurisdiction
Who is the appeal heard from
The appeal is heard by a panel of 2-3 High Court judges from the Queens bench Division
What can this panel decide
They can;
- reverse or vary the decision
- make an alternative decision
- give the magistrates their opinion on the area of law involved
if the appeal is successful, the case will be sent back to the magistrates for reconsideration
Case Stated Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court to the Queens Bench Divisional Court
Who is this available to
The prosecution and the defence
Reason for appeals from mags court to QBD
On a point of law by way of case stated
Who is the appeal heard by
Panel of two or three High Court Judges, which might include a COA judge
Is further appeal possible
- possible appeal by the prosecution or the defence to the Supreme court on a point of general public importance
Must have leave to appeal by either supreme court or QBD
Result of appeal
Appeal quashed
confirm appeal
Or remit case back to the mags court (do not punish)
Appeals from the Magistrates’ Court;
To QBD and then the Supreme court
A further appeal can be made to the Supreme Court if what two things
- there is a point of law of general public importance
- leave to appeal is granted by the Queens Bench Division or the Supreme court (asking the court for permission to appeal) leapfrog where a case goes from the High court to the Supreme court missing out the COA
Name and explain the case study in which the QBD wanted to change the law by appealing to supreme court
C v DPP (1994)
-This case considered the issue of children having criminal responsibility
- HELD; it is not to be presumed that children aged between 10-14 know the difference between right and wrong, therefore criminal activity will not always result in prosecution
-The divisional court of the QBD wanted to change the law so it always presumed a child 10-14 knew the difference between right and wrong and the supreme court held they were bound by precedent and were not at liberty to change the law
reason for appeal
Rare, but possible - against sentence and or unsafe conviction