criminal law 2a (1st term) Flashcards
(137 cards)
lesson one
define court hierarchy
- the court hierarchy is a ranking of the courts based upon the severity & complexity of the cases in which they can adjudicate.
- each court has its own jurisdiction which can be considered an original jurisdiction or appellate
lesson one
define jurisdiction
- the legal authority of a court to decide legal cases
lesson one
define original jurisdiction
- the power of a court to hear a case for the 1st time
lesson one
define appellate jurisdiction
- the power of a court to hear a case on appeal
lesson one
what are the 2 reasons for court hierarchy?
- specialisation
- appeals
lesson one
define specialisation
- the lvl of expertise gained by the j / m which is dev. from hearing the same matters repeatedly. this allows j / m to resolve disputes in a more consistent, efficient & fair manner
lesson one
how does specialisation lead to increased efficiency?
- b/c judges are likely to have to refer to past precedents through research, helping to est a great knoweldge of law and sim case matters
lesson one
what is an example answer of linking the reason of specialisation to the existence of a hierarchy?
- a hierarchy allows for spec. b/c the ranking of courts ensures that there are clear jurisdictional boundaries for where crim. matters can be heard which reinforces judges’ ability to dev. their expertise.
- if there was X hierarchy, judges would be exposed to all varieties of cases, lim their opp to dev expertise
lesson one
what is the structure for answering reasons for court hierarchy questions?
- explain the reason e.g. spec.
- use an example of a court to reinforce your response
- link back to how a court hierarchy promotes this
lesson one
what is an example of specialisation?
- w/n CC:
- hears IO - gen X involving a homocide
- j have dev spec in those matters incl elements of each crime that needs to be proven
- j dev exp in jury matters
- j can hear appeals from MG on leniency & severity of sentencing –> consistency
lesson one
define appeals
- the application / process to have a higher court review a ruling / decision / judgement at trial
- X re-trial w/ jury
lesson one
why are appeals needed?
- appeals allow for a party (appellant) who is dissatisfied w/ a judgment at trial to take a matter to a higher court for review. the system allows for fairness so that any mistakes made at trial can be corrected
lesson one
what are the grounds for appeals?
- question of law
- appealing a conviction
- appealing a sentence
lesson one
what does question of law mean?
- the appellant can argue that th law has X been followed
- e.g. allowing inadmissible evidence or the incorrect application of a statue
lesson one
what does appealing a conviction mean?
- the offender can argue that the burden / standard from the pros. has X been met
lesson one
what does appealing a sentence mean?
- the pros. can appeal a sent. on grounds of leniency & the off can appeal a sent arguing it is too severe / excessive
lesson two
who are considered the key personnel w/n the courtroom?
- the judge (mag)
- the jury
- the parties
lesson two
what is the purpose of the judge?
- the purpose of a judge in trial is to act as a referee/ they oversee the case to ensure that court procedures are carried out in accordance w/ the rules to ensure that parties are treated fairly
- judges must = imp, X favour any sie & have X connection to the pros or acc
lesson two
what does it mean for a judge to be impartial?
- must be unbiased
- X favour one side or be vested in the outcome of the case
- should X have apprehended bias = create a situation where a reasonable person may believe that the judge hearing the case may X bring an impartial mind
lesson two
how do judges act impartial?
- managing the trial
- decide on the outcome of the case
- sentencing the offender
lesson two
how do judges manage the trial?
- ensuring that court procedures are followed; both parties have the same opp to present their case
- asking clarifying questions of wit, calling new wit
- adjourning - taking breaks in the rial to ensure that there is X disparity e.g. if a witness was hsowing signs of distress & cont. to testify may lead to inacc information
- det admissibility of evidence = evid must be relevant to issue / hearsay evid X admissible
lesson two
how do judges decide on the outcome of the case?
- giving direct. to jury to ensure a fair trial - informing the jury that acc is X req to give evid –> reinforcing that jury needs to apply the elements of the law
- expl. leg def to the jury
lesson two
how does the judge complete the sentencing of the offender?
- if acc found g. by jury / pleads g –> parties will make submis. for sentencing
- judge must follow the Sentencing Act 1991 (vic) & comply w/ leg.
- judge must factor in agg / miti / VIS should there be one to ensure procedural fairness in sentencing
lesson two
what is the purpose of the jury?
- the purpose of the jury in an indict trial is to det. the g of the acc through being a ‘decider of the facts’
- must be imp & base their decision on the evidence presented whilst applying the law in an indep manner