Critical Thinking Flashcards
Final study (40 cards)
Slippery Slope
arguing that one small action will lead to a chain of events ending in disaster, without good reason to believe that chain will actually happen.
Post Hoc
assuming that because one thing happened after another thing, the first thing must have caused the second thing.
Hasty Generalization
jumping to a conclusion about a large group based on too small or unrepresentative a sample.
Proposition
A declarative statement that can be either true or false but not both simultaneously.
Premises
statements that provide support or evidence
Conclusions
the statement that follows from or is claimed to follow from those premises.
Arguments
try to prove something using reasons
Non-arguments
simply state things without trying to prove anything.
Validity
means if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.
Strong
means if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Formal Fallacies
mistakes in the logical structure or form of an argument, regardless of the content.
Informal Fallacies
mistakes in reasoning that occur because of problems with the content or context of the argument, not its logical form.
Conformation Bias
when people search for, interpret, and remember information that supports what they already believe.
Cognitive Bias
mental shortcuts or errors in thinking that lead people to make irrational judgments and decisions.
Anchoring
people rely too heavily on the first piece of information they receive
Mental heuristics
quick mental shortcuts or rules of thumb that people use to make decisions and solve problems.
Ad hominem
attacking the person making the argument instead of addressing their actual argument.
Genetic Fallacy
dismissing an argument solely based on where it came from or its origins.
Straw Figure
when you misrepresent someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.
Red Herring
bringing up an unrelated topic to distract from the main argument.
Irrelevant Appeals
try to win an argument by playing on emotions, authority, or popularity instead of using valid reasoning.
Equivocation
using the same word in two different ways in an argument to create confusion or mislead.
Appeal to Ignorance
claiming something must be true just because it hasn’t been proven false, or false because it hasn’t been proven true.
Texas Sharpshooter
when someone cherry-picks data to find a pattern while ignoring data that doesn’t fit that pattern.